Beyond high risk, the cost of declining has to be measured as well.
What is the worst case scenario of accepting?
If the worst case scenario for accepting outways the cost of declining then there is no reason to decline
So, best case scenario? We get an entire clan of Salamanders to bend the knee, which is huge. Typically they bow to no one, and only follow the Efreeti because of a knife at their throats. This then paves the way for other Salamander clans to follow suit. And, of course, a major beachhead into the Plane of Fire.
Worst case scenario? Our forces are stretched dangerously thin, and the Efreeti show up to support their salamander minions, forcing us to retreat with losses. We should make this move prepared for rival incursions.
Woah fealty means we got new area to build stuff on? And it's ok the plane of fire?
Yeah. The Plane of Fire has islands of non-flammable volcanic rocks that various races build strongholds and citadels on. We were actually gonna make our own colonization attempts in the future, via Amrelath and Yrten building their own dukedoms. This is just an unexpected first step, but not an unwelcome one.
Alrighty then. Referencing the following info post:
I think we should go with around three capital ships. I'd love to go with more, but we simply don't have the forces to spread around like that.
So, from the looks of it, one ship can be pulled from Harrenhal, specifically the IAF Makhaira which is a Gladius-class Destroyer, and two can be pulled from Sorcerer's Deep -- the aptly named IAF Gladius which is also a Gladius-class destroyer, and the IAF Moonchaser led by Moonsong.
Obviously this is just the beginnings of a plan, but I think we can make this work without dangerously stretching our forces thin. Thoughts?