I mean... I wouldn't trust the Victorians to know Communism when actually faced with it. Let alone understand why an ideologically committed Marxist might be able to deal with them if they had to or why an ideologically committed Marxist might have ended up being a dictator by following the path of good intentions to the hot place.
Ehh. If the MSR is
conspicuous enough that we've noticed, the Vicks probably at least noticed the red flags and things.
Again, Grand Rapids is too large and important a place to entrust to someone the Victorians consider a threat. The bare fact that the MSR
exists is strong evidence that for one reason or another, the Victorians didn't see them as threatening.
Since the very existence of communist ideology pushes some of the Vicks' buttons, there must have been something else, some even
bigger force, pushing the Victorians to feel that the MSR was not a threat. The most likely explanations are:
1) That the MSR is strong and longlasting (by post-Collapse warlord government standards), but also brutish, ineffective, and unpopular. So much so that in effect they are constantly unstable, and unlikely to be able to expand or consolidate a regional power bloc. Certainly not one capable of
actually threatening Victoria. If they were around in 2070 but not a threat to Victoria, because they spent (and still spend!) 90% of their energy quashing revolts and dissent in their own territory, that explains their continued survival. Alternatively...
2) They were a lot smaller three or four years ago, but
grew rapidly in the power vacuum created by Hellfire Burns devastating Victorian spy networks and by the Victorians not sending any punitive expeditions into Lake Michigan in 2072-75. They survived by being too weak to attract attention until now, and have been taking advantage of the conditions we created to prosper.
...
In case (2) they've made a lot of enemies by conquest, I suspect, but on the other hand they owe a lot of good fortune to us and may be on some level grateful.
In case (1) they are likely to be very unpopular with their own population, something we need to be
very careful about because of the thread's known bias (myself included) to look for potential political left-wing allies. We should not assume that just because they are avowed socialists, that they are popular or loved by the masses. Certainly a lot of avowed socialists of the 20th century were not.