"The fact that he ate them is both execution, which was his due, and desecration of the bodies, which was ill done of him," Elia replies, not willing to give up her side of the argument.
@DragonParadox, this part felt more than a little weird. Elia should be aware of the various ways we desecrate the corpses of our enemies. She's part of the royal family (and an adult), so it's not like this would be hidden from her.

Relath eating a traitor is fairly minor in the face of that.
 
@DragonParadox, this part felt more than a little weird. Elia should be aware of the various ways we desecrate the corpses of our enemies. She's part of the royal family (and an adult), so it's not like this would be hidden from her.

Relath eating a traitor is fairly minor in the face of that.
It's possible to be fully aware of some of the foibles, perceived or otherwise, of your family, still love them, but disagree with them.
 
[X] Azel

Technically speaking we are doing some kinda weird version of constitutional monarchy all over the place and we aren't against democracy in general, we just like having the option to actively intervene in stuff without hoops to jump through if needed while most of the time letting others govern themselves.
The thing is, all the democracy was always meant as another layer of societal control, but the narrative keeps treating is as a genuine attempt at democracy.

Which irks me something fierce.
 
It's possible to be fully aware of some of the foibles, perceived or otherwise, of your family, still love them, but disagree with them.
It felt more than a little silly and hypocritical to get hung up on a vassal doing this when the king himself is engaging in far worse. I'd have more respect for the argument if she acknowledged the elephant in the room.

Either way, moot point. We're definitely not going to stop.
The thing is, all the democracy was always meant as another layer of societal control, but the narrative keeps treating is as a genuine attempt at democracy.

Which irks me something fierce.
This. The lower elected councils were just to give the citizens minor power to fight over. It was never actual democracy.
 
The thing is, all the democracy was always meant as another layer of societal control, but the narrative keeps treating is as a genuine attempt at democracy.

Which irks me something fierce.
Wait... are you saying democracy naturally isn't a layer of societal control? That's news to me. :p
 
@DragonParadox, this part felt more than a little weird. Elia should be aware of the various ways we desecrate the corpses of our enemies. She's part of the royal family (and an adult), so it's not like this would be hidden from her.

Relath eating a traitor is fairly minor in the face of that.

She is aware of it, she just objects to desecrating the dead on charges of mere treason. Elia does not have to be perfectly comfortable with everything Viserys does to be on his side.
 
Wait... are you saying democracy naturally isn't a layer of societal control? That's news to me. :p
We're all aware it makes it difficult for single people to gather massive amounts of power since the levers and mechanisms of government are too unwieldy to direct in a top-down fashion like they were in the early 20th century.
 
[X] Azel

Well, at least this way we can take care of dissidence out in the open, and not let it fester unseen.
Yep. Unregulated protests are a great way for our various enemies to incite riot after riot. I feel like DP was baiting us into a trap with this.
She is aware of it, she just objects to desecrating the dead on charges of mere treason. Elia does not have to be perfectly comfortable with everything Viserys does to be on his side.
She must not be comfortable with quite a lot in that case if that's really a line for her. But eh. Relath did good in eating the traitors. I'm jealous he was able to get away with it. If we did that we'd be tarnished as a monster forever.
 
@Azel @Goldfish While it's good that we don't really have to develop riot gear, since most medieval armor already kinda counts, perhaps we should have one of those Non-Violence field items ready and accessible by Law Enforcement for protests? So that no one CAN even take violent action within the boundary.

It's honestly a lot more effective than tear gas and cudgels, since then can you can kind of separate and herd the rowdy ones away from the peaceful people in the crowd, then just quietly arrest them after that.
I know what you're talking about, but I can't remember the name of the spell. If you can remind me, I can see about adding something to the crafting schedule or commission list.

We also have 8,420 doses of Sleep-Smoke, which would be great for safely de-escalating violent crowds without resorting to potentially lethal force.

Sleep-Smoke [One dose affects a globe 10 feet in diameter on the first round, expanding outward to a globe 20 feet in diameter on the second round, and being harmless thereafter. A strong wind can move the globe of sleep-smoke. Type: Inhaled DC 15; Initial damage unconsciousness for 1 minute; Secondary damage unconsciousness for 1d3 minutes]

[X] Crake
 
Wait... are you saying democracy naturally isn't a layer of societal control? That's news to me. :p
Well, Viserys repeatedly sounded as if he has great hopes and expectations of positive results from involving the citizenry in politics, while the behind the scene design process always had the goal to channel political dissent into a system that ensures it dies in committee. All while the state controls all mass media and can manipulate public opinion as necessary.
 
She must not be comfortable with quite a lot in that case if that's really a line for her. But eh. Relath did good in eating the traitors. I'm jealous he was able to get away with it. If we did that we'd be tarnished as a monster forever.
The reason he can get away with it is because he has us in his corner. So long as someone can look at the Imperium and say, "At least a human is in charge" (even if it's only a monkey suit) then they'll forgive the dragon subordinate acting like a dragon, to a point at least.

Lucky bastard.
 
I know what you're talking about, but I can't remember the name of the spell. If you can remind me, I can see about adding something to the crafting schedule or commission list.

We also have 8,420 doses of Sleep-Smoke, which would be great for safely de-escalating violent crowds without resorting to potentially lethal force.

Sleep-Smoke [One dose affects a globe 10 feet in diameter on the first round, expanding outward to a globe 20 feet in diameter on the second round, and being harmless thereafter. A strong wind can move the globe of sleep-smoke. Type: Inhaled DC 15; Initial damage unconsciousness for 1 minute; Secondary damage unconsciousness for 1d3 minutes]

[X] Crake
The current stockpile sounds good for our needs. Crowds will largely disperse after a short salvo of those fired from Launchers.
 
She must not be comfortable with quite a lot in that case if that's really a line for her. But eh. Relath did good in eating the traitors. I'm jealous he was able to get away with it. If we did that we'd be tarnished as a monster forever.
He did not "get away with it" in the PR sense.
See his neighbours here still misstrusting him years later.
 
He did not "get away with it" in the PR sense.
See his neighbours here still misstrusting him years later.
He also doesn't care about what monkeys think about him. He's a dragon and above such nonsense. So long as they pay their tribute he probably doesn't even register it.

EDIT: Viserys on the other hand has his hands tied with the appearance of humanity, and having to play along with various societal norms. We can't discard them even if we wanted to for fear of public backlash and annoying cleanup time. Relath, however, never gave a shit to begin with. That's why I said he gets away with it. Even the most obvious drawback for what he did isn't an actual punishment for him.
 
Last edited:
She must not be comfortable with quite a lot in that case if that's really a line for her. But eh. Relath did good in eating the traitors. I'm jealous he was able to get away with it. If we did that we'd be tarnished as a monster forever.

She has her daughter back, she is respected and safe, her House looks like it will be doing great great under the next regime and even Oberyn came out with land and hopefully responsibility out of it. She can bear the discomfort easily enough.
 
Cool to see the companions having opinions on things.

The thing is, all the democracy was always meant as another layer of societal control, but the narrative keeps treating is as a genuine attempt at democracy.
I noticed nobody seems to have gotten the memo there. Is that going to be... a problem?

I figured Relath for example would ignore them and Yrael would treat them like something worth listening to. Basically doing it case by case.

Viserys repeatedly sounded as if he has great hopes and expectations of positive results from involving the citizenry in politics,
The way I see it. And this is an opinion.

Hes met a lot of whores and street urchins with more good sense than lords and rich nobles.

Not everyone can be great, but greatness can come from anywhere.
 
Cool to see the companions having opinions on things.


I noticed nobody seems to have gotten the memo there. Is that going to be... a problem?

I figured Relath for example would ignore them and Yrael would treat them like something worth listening to. Basically doing it case by case.


The way I see it. And this is an opinion.

Hes met a lot of whores and street urchins with more good sense than lords and rich nobles.

Not everyone can be great, but greatness can come from anywhere.
Viserys has a very weird take on it. He's still nobility born and raised in ASOIAF, but bitter experience has taught him that commoners can sometimes outstrip nobility in talent and reliability. However, for the regular commoner who isn't all that educated or just doesn't have much innate talent, he doesn't actually value their opinions at all, and certainly not on politics and rulership. They're valued as citizens and are thus under his protection, but he's not about to listen to their opinions on topics of state purely because he doesn't trust them to be informed and smart about it.

DP covered this a while back when he clarified Viserys' views on commoners and how he can value some for being useful while being utterly dismissive of those he deems useless. The whole mindset crystallized back in Braavos when Viserys was in the Thieve's Guild and had to rationalize why a commoner so obviously had power over him.
 
Last edited:
I noticed nobody seems to have gotten the memo there. Is that going to be... a problem?

I figured Relath for example would ignore them and Yrael would treat them like something worth listening to. Basically doing it case by case.
What the local lords do with it is largely their cup of tea. As long as there is no dissent or sedition brewing under their watch, I don't see reason to interfere there.
The way I see it. And this is an opinion.

Hes met a lot of whores and street urchins with more good sense than lords and rich nobles.

Not everyone can be great, but greatness can come from anywhere.
True, bot those can always make a career for themselves in the bureaucracy. Democracy doesn't favor sensible people, but demagogues.
 
Back
Top