Bear in mind that this was one single failure, it didn't render all our attack useless. Viserys lost an action, the God did too.
There would have been way more salt if the god had targetted squishy Lya, for example.
I still would have accepted it, so really that all just comes down to differing perspectives. I think mechanical choices have a similar importance to narrative ones, especially when Mythic related choices are kind of one-and-the-same kind of choices.
If those choices become meaningless, why make any choices?
Yes, accepting death or harm to someone you care about is a narrative conflict, or at least a flash point.
On the other hand, throughout most of the story after we started bargaining with Gods on a regular basis, DP repeatedly hammered home "guys, Gods can't solve everything", "Guys, Gods are not vending machines", "Guys, Gods don't work that way".
If these are things we "take as given" and have to accept, then why does it always seem like none of those things ever actually fucking matter when the enemy tries to use them against us?
I don't think my perspective here is all that warped. I am trying to come from a rational place here. I did not speak a peep at all about Zathir basically being irrelevant because it makes sense. I spoke up about Viserys' big moment in the last update being a big dud, because
it doesn't make sense.
I don't think I'm in the wrong here.