@Azel,
@Crake has it. "
Because of all the transparent OOC motivations pasted all over the situation". Rereading that part is just as bad as rereading the "Viserys must now make a decision to become coherent again" updates that happened after you argued with DP. Sure it had to happen, but it honestly feels forced into the narrative, and therefore rereading that passage just reminds me of thread discussions that were very unpleasant to read.
It definitely had to happen, but waiting a few weeks for it to come up instead of suddenly engineering a situation as an explicit morality lesson would have been nice.
Oh, and let's be honest : the Conclave was also a moment of great stupidity on our part, and I dislike feeling stupid. Normally I reread things where I feel stupid because I know they'll have a payoff later, but the Conclave
didn't have a payoff (OOC concerns and in-thread drama influenced that, again, which sours the reread). It didn't lead to a new arc, to new interesting characters, or anything like that. It didn't even have a clever twist or a great fight scene.
He certainly never mentioned it. No "let's compromise", no "let's work together", no "yeah, we did wrong, we should set this right".
Of course he wasn't going to mention it, we were in social combat and such an admission would have been inconvenient.
Look, can we
please not have another Lucan argument?
In any case, his history and motivations probably aren't essential. All we need to know is what he's up to, and his main modus operandi. Oh, and checking if we have a good idea of his end goal could be useful (although I think we do).
I personally am in favor of interacting with some members of the Chosen more, of course, but ideally I'd like to do it in a way that doesn't involve trying to figure out what their backstories and motivations during the Conclave were.