The problem I foresee with the Temple of Artemis, given previous Eretrian religious developments, is the difficulties inherent in sourcing a "unicorn" without all our priests getting trampled by an irritated pachyderm.
I'm not seeing the problem here. We can just replace them with Pythagoreans.
 
Wow! The vote for Proboulos is neck and neck with Antipatria only leading by 1 vote!

Edit: sorry, by 2 votes
Edit2: sorry, its a tie now...
Adhoc vote count started by racnor on Jun 3, 2019 at 1:31 AM, finished with 425 posts and 90 votes.
 
Last edited:
So if the Pythagoreans are against beans and meat, wouldn't that mean they would be a direct threat to Eretria's rock lifting abilities?
 
No, because I think the beans and meat thing was from the Pythagorean sect that lost out in their internal slapfight over which group was the most Pythagorean. The one that won, and that we'd be importing, was the one more focused on practical applications of maths and scientific observation to get at the numbers that underlie everything than on maintaining odd habits and taboos.

So they're still weirdos, but useful ones instead of vegan stereotypes.
 
I'm not seeing the problem here. We can just replace them with Pythagoreans.
An excellent incentive structure to develop being able to calculate the closing speed of an enraged "unicorn" rapidly!
No, because I think the beans and meat thing was from the Pythagorean sect that lost out in their internal slapfight over which group was the most Pythagorean. The one that won, and that we'd be importing, was the one more focused on practical applications of maths and scientific observation to get at the numbers that underlie everything than on maintaining odd habits and taboos.

So they're still weirdos, but useful ones instead of vegan stereotypes.
So we are quite literally getting the lot that are bean counters?:lol
 
"Friends, citizens, men of Eretria! I am truly proud of what the Demos Galê has achieved this election," Theophilos casts his stones for Kyros Gennadios and Mnemnon Keylonos, "Behold! The only deme with not a single stone cast in its favor! Today we are all weasels, and every day that we do not act to reform the Demes."

[X] Proboulos: Kyros Gennadios (Demos Antipatria)
[X] Xenoparakletor: Mnemnon Keylonos (Demos Exoria)

Adhoc vote count started by Godwinson on Jun 3, 2019 at 2:54 AM, finished with 429 posts and 90 votes.

Adhoc vote count started by Godwinson on Jun 3, 2019 at 2:56 AM, finished with 430 posts and 91 votes.
 
Last edited:
[X] Proboulos: Theron Archippos (Demos Exoria)
[X] Xenoparakletor: Obander Eupraxis (Demos Antipatria)
 
[X] Proboulos: Theron Archippos (Demos Exoria)
[X] Xenoparakletor: Obander Eupraxis (Demos Antipatria)
(Damn, I was hoping that completely absurd speech would've been the tie-breaker to seal the vote, because that'd have been hilarious)
Adhoc vote count started by Godwinson on Jun 3, 2019 at 3:31 AM, finished with 435 posts and 91 votes.
 
So we are looking at a likely pluarlity goverment with both Antipatrids and Exorians hovering around 40%. I just hope the narrative isn't too divisive, since the two platforms are actually quite compatible. The big differences are Immigration policy (Loyality vs. Labor) and the temple extension (Make DM dominant throughout the Epulian League vs. Enhance Barbaroi Hellenization).
However, their religious policies have the potential for synthesis and then we are left with a military policy for the Antipatrids and a commercial one for the Exorians. If money is the key issue to be able to undertake both during this boule, then I personally don't see that as a big problem. Our treasury is full and we will have only 3 out of 4 years of planned construction, which should give us even more funds to allocate.


I have decided to make the rolls for lower offices dependent on a combined vote for the Xenoparakletor and Proboulos.
Since the result of the proboulos election influences but does not determine whether a deme will win one of the minor offices,
Which of the two is it now? Only the ratio of the proboulos election, or the combined ratio of both elections?
 
Last edited:
So we are looking at a likely pluarlity goverment with both Antipatrids and Exorians hovering around 40%. I just hope the narrative isn't too divisive, since the two platforms are actually quite compatible. The big differences are Immigration policy (Loyality vs. Labor) and the temple extension (Make DM dominant throughout the Epulian League vs. Enhance Barbaroi Hellenization).
However, their religious policies have the potential for synthesis and then we are left with a military policy for the Antipatrids and a commercial one for the Exorians. If money is the key issue to be able to undertake both during this boule, then I personally don't see that as a big problem. Our treasury is full and we will have only 3 out of 4 years of planned construction, which should give us even more funds to allocate.




Which of the two is it now? Only the ratio of the proboulos election, or the combined ratio of both elections?

It's not just trade, that's the thing; it's also binding closer our barbaroi vassals. Especially good in case of Messapii - trade will likely give them a bit of an economic boost they need.

Can be nifty if we manage to combine it with festivals in some way, to keep hellenizing them.
 
A blend of the two platforms would be fine to be honest. A Temple to Artemis but in her aspect as part of one of the distinctively Eretrian Divine Marriages with Orion, for example.
 
More indecision
[X] Proboulos: Theron Archippos (Demos Exoria)
[X] Xenoparakletor: Obander Eupraxis (Demos Antipatria)


Also, a moment to comment the atmosphere of the thread. In a normal quest an argument this close would have already generated at least a staff warning's worth of salt.
 
If we get a plurality regarding the temple, it may cost us an additional 2-3 years to build both the Divine Wedding and the Artemis Temple.
 
If we get a plurality regarding the temple, it may cost us an additional 2-3 years to build both the Divine Wedding and the Artemis Temple.

Suppose we want to build a temple.
It will take 5 years. However, by the 3rd year we expand the project and now it will take 7 years. By 6th year it expands again and will now take 8 years. By 7th it will take half a year more, and so on and so forth.

Thus, whatever point of time are we in, there is still some building to be done before the temple is complete
.


Hey, by the way, Zeno has already been born, right? he was born in 495BC after all.
 
Also, a moment to comment the atmosphere of the thread. In a normal quest an argument this close would have already generated at least a staff warning's worth of salt.

I believe that the rp nature provided a bit of a cushion, making it less personal than it could have been.
 
No, because I think the beans and meat thing was from the Pythagorean sect that lost out in their internal slapfight over which group was the most Pythagorean. The one that won, and that we'd be importing, was the one more focused on practical applications of maths and scientific observation to get at the numbers that underlie everything than on maintaining odd habits and taboos.

So they're still weirdos, but useful ones instead of vegan stereotypes.

Also, so far as I know we've got nothing better than hearsay about the diet things. They may have loved beans and ate meat, and the stories to the contrary are just false rumours meant to make them seem like a bunch of weirdos you didn't want in your city.

fasquardon
 
@Spacegnom Combined ratio. The part you quoted is not exclusive with the xenoparakletor influencing it as well, but I have edited it to clarify.

Vote closes in a few hours.
 
@Spacegnom Combined ratio. The part you quoted is not exclusive with the xenoparakletor influencing it as well, but I have edited it to clarify.

Vote closes in a few hours.
Would this be possible, given near parity between Exodia and Antipatrid?
A blend of the two platforms would be fine to be honest. A Temple to Artemis but in her aspect as part of one of the distinctively Eretrian Divine Marriages with Orion, for example.
 
The Exoria domestic slate is very appealing for the cultural paths it could lead us down, but I think the Antipatrid importation of the Pythagoreans could lead to fascinating results in terms of blending their unusual stance on gender with our urge to pair off the gods into equal sets, and our tendency to pragmatism and prizing of direct work even by the aristocracy with the potential of applied mathematics.

So, I totally respect where you're coming from here, and I don't disagree. I would like to see the Pythagoreans come to Eretria as well, I love mathematics and I think it could lead to some very interesting things. Feminist philosopher-mathematicians especially!

My motivation for voting the way I am here is because I am confident that in the worst case, the Pythagoreans will still be around in five or ten years. The synergies we can grab this turn with the Exorian slate, however - striking whilst the iron is hot in forging bonds with our new barbaroi allies, taking the chance to effectively bless our union and turn the war into a retroactive act of piety with the Temple of Artemis- seem time-limited to this turn. So as @Cavalier says, it's sort of a question of timing. There is a golden moment to begin trade and joint festivals this turn and woo our new friends, and reform our religious calendar whilst showing our renewed piety.

That being said, your suggestion here of a merger on certain key points is also interesting, and not something I'm necessarily opposed to. Certainly just going by the regular mechanics, with the vote having been the way it is, I suspect there will be many Antipatrid officers, so we may end up seeing the Pythagoreans turn up sooner, rather than later.
 
This is amazing. When I wrote my vote for Exoria, that internal policy had 0 votes and I thought I was basically wasting my vote.
Now, thanks to Skippy tirelessly advocating for it, it's actually winning.

Even convinced me of the Antipatria foreign policy (especially now with the change in the mechanic). But seeing as they are comfortably winning, I will keep my previous vote for balance.

I didn't think a good argument would be able to sway a vote like that. Great thread community.

Also thanks to Cetashwayo for a great Quest.
 
Back
Top