Can we...
First: A lot the non military things that we can take are things that will help us in the long run that will work better the earlier we run with them. And having more time before attention is drawn to us is also good because we can work to make people's lives better as well as expand. If we want to diplomatically and economically we need to start now when we have the chance to start with these options in place from the go.
And...
We're running the risk of becoming that fabled army with a state, because it might end up being a feedback loop where we keep having to feeding lives and taxes into the grinder from moment one. There's not going to be a chance to step back and focus on the essential base of a successful state. We're not going to have the chance to establish the peace before we give way to an endless military emergency.
I'm not saying that this will happen. By no means. But we run the risk of entering into too risky a situation too early on moving from starving military situation to starving military situation where we are forced to burn everything in the furnace of war. And we will not have the time, attention, or resources to spare to building the foundation for a prosperous and secure democracy. We will be a lean wolf of a people that devours its own for survival. And it will have to be that way so the reactionaries do not slaughter us. We will have to vote that way.
With Old Guard and Last Echo we are going to have to commit much more fully to the military to survive the initial and inevitable confrontation. And once we start down that path forever will it dominate our destiny.
Do you think the Victorians are going to stop once they've started?
They're fascists, the endless conflict is desired because they believe that it will make them strong. They already send their best overseas to die to achieve that. Even if we win. Once they start, they will not stop, and we will not be able to divert resources away from the military, we will not be able to build up a knowledge or economic base that allows us to contest them from deep pockets and a secure position. We will not start from a stable democracy. It will be war and war, and fighting after fighting.
Again, this is not 100% likely, maybe not even over a coin flip in chance. But I bet you can follow me along this line of reasoning and see how easy it is for the military realities of the situation to require "hard choice" after "hard choice" until we've starved our way to victory. And, It Will, Be, The, Military at the head of that victory, not the culture, not the people, not the civilian government. And the army will want it's say and we will give it to them because it has always been that way, a beloved military dictatorship wrapped in red, white, and blue. A more inclusive Victoria.
People were worried about the chance of the communists taking over and morphing into Stalin. (And even then the CPSU emerged out of an endless desperate war for survival!) How many military dictatorships have their been in history? How many times have successful generals shot their way onto thrones and into crowns? We risk popular Sullas, Cromwells, Napoleons, and Stalins. If we're lucky we'll get a Bolivar!
If you are voting for a military strategy or to put the Accords government into military conflict right away, you need to bear in mind the risk, that we be endlessly feeding the military for necessary reasons of national security until it is all that is left. If you make that vote, make it with the knowledge that you may be committing us to avoiding building peace, prosperity, and democracy, and instead plunging the new America into a perilous war where we can't see or control what comes out the other side.