I'd stall any actual intervention in Europe for a year, using the time to build up the more professional part of the army and letting the war exhaustion and debt build up among the combatants.
It's not going to turn out to be an addictive drug, right?Asking for a bit more detail, it had come out that in the region in question there was a plant considered sacred to primitive tribes for it's medicinal properties, and the latest settlers had been disturbing these plants somehow
Maybe ten or twenty years, but that's hardly any time. Wars can be quite profitable, and more than that, the prestige of victory is quite important.Because wars are expensive and deadly. Sometimes they're necessary, but we could easily lose more in a war than we'd make from the ports for decades.
Why would we do that? We're already close to everything important.
So, something nobody has talked about, what is the plant that's causing trouble in Siberia?
It's not going to turn out to be an addictive drug, right?
It... You know, given the shape of the nation it could easily be opium poppies.So, something nobody has talked about, what is the plant that's causing trouble in Siberia?
It's not going to turn out to be an addictive drug, right?
Good points.Maybe ten or twenty years, but that's hardly any time. Wars can be quite profitable, and more than that, the prestige of victory is quite important.
This is not an age where you should just sit around peacefully because you don't want to spend money going to war, this is a time where you need to hammer down the borders of your nation - and seizing access to the Pacific is a treasure worth going to war for all by itself.
Why did the British - a thallasocratic empire - claim every island they could?
Why did the USA - a thallasocratic empire - steal every island it could and claim the rest?
Reach. Basing. The ability to project power and tell other nations that you can, in fact, reach out and touch them if you have to.
...crown forests cleared for immediately sellable wood and more land
I say it's marijuana. It originated in Central Asia, with entire fields of hemp growing in places. Our colonists likely tried to clear them for farmland or something.So, something nobody has talked about, what is the plant that's causing trouble in Siberia?
It's not going to turn out to be an addictive drug, right?
We can also have access to that ocean via that little purple strip on the map between Khem and Black Sheep, which I think corresponds to a large river.Straight up, why?
Getting locked out of the pacific would be right dreadful for trade (money, delicious, delicious money), winning a war is good for national prestige, and we have thallasocratic ambitions which most assuredly means we want as many ports in as many places as we can physically get.
In fact, I would very much suggest we Colonialize some of the pacific islands and spots of the American west coast (or, say, take over Hawaii) and Madagascar and then put fleet bases there, everywhere, to extend our reach.
It... You know, given the shape of the nation it could easily be opium poppies.
Say, @Academia Nut, does Diego Garcia have an equivalent in this world?
I'm hearing is "we should take these for our own Thallasocratic Ambitions", then. Good good.There is probably a small chain of islands in the Monsoon Sea that the Hespranxer have used as a resupply post that the Sketch might like.
So, with the knowledge that DI costs nothing but PW, why exactly do we vote for temp IC instead of PW to get the real deal or, perhaps more wisely if it's needed, SoL to keep happiness high? @Academia Nut, do we lose current temp Cons at the beginning of the next turn? And is current temp SoL from nobility bonus? I can't quite parse the last sentence.
Can we use diplomacy to ask our neighbours for help in modernizing our economy? Like the Kielmyr?
Because every turn we delay gives the Nohon a bigger stranglehold on the eastern coast of Kyberia. And Frankly, that is unacceptable.Still don't get why people value +1 temp IC more than +1 permanent IC (not usable for 1 turn, via +1 PW -> Develop Industry)
Are we really that desperate that we need to take all the Kyberi land next turn? Doing so over the next 2-3 turns seems safer and smarter and gives us more permanent stats.
Straight up, why?
Getting locked out of the pacific would be right dreadful for trade (money, delicious, delicious money), winning a war is good for national prestige, and we have thallasocratic ambitions which most assuredly means we want as many ports in as many places as we can physically get.
In fact, I would very much suggest we Colonialize some of the pacific islands and spots of the American west coast (or, say, take over Hawaii) and Madagascar and then put fleet bases there, everywhere, to extend our reach.
Unless you think it's all going to be claimed by the end of next turn, that's irrelevant.Because every turn we delay gives the Nohon a bigger stranglehold on the eastern coast of Kyberia. And Frankly, that is unacceptable.
I'm hearing is "we should take these for our own Thallasocratic Ambitions", then. Good good.
This is not an age where you should just sit around peacefully because you don't want to spend money going to war, this is a time where you need to hammer down the borders of your nation - and seizing access to the Pacific is a treasure worth going to war for all by itself.
Isolationism is what fucked the old Ymaryn empire and you want to go straight back to that?