Truth is a useful tool, and has the benefit of usually being easier to remember than a lie, but like all tools it's not necessarily useful in all situations.
Truth is a useful tool, and has the benefit of usually being easier to remember than a lie, but like all tools it's not necessarily useful in all situations.
If he does find a normal person to have a romantic relationship with, I expect that they won't stay normal long. At the very least I'd expect them to be Dannered; and if they are compatible with it, he does have a spare orange power ring.Of course being a super hero story it also adds a LOT of stress, but that's why I support dating divine beings who can handle themselves.
Like a certain someone who resides in Hades court.![]()
I'm assuming you're joking, but in case you're not. What would make you say that he doesn't have actual friends? If he didn't like his peers he wouldn't be able to use his ring as effectively to help them, in a lot of the choices he has made stem from the fact that he likes his peers.As I understand it, Paul has realised that he has no actual friends, and he doesn't really like any of his peers (At the very least, he looks down on them). He doesn't have any family. Desperate for companionship, he's decided to get a significant other, because by conventional standards that's considered a high level of intimacy.
What he doesn't realise, I think, is that typically long lasting romantic relationships start as platonic ones, and like all fulfilling relationships take time to develop. Years, I'd say. So he's chasing after the end result instead of planting the seeds of true friendship.
Yet another example of asexual superiority.![]()
I'm trying hard to stay civil, but I'm hardly polite enough to not let some of my annoyance leak through.While I generally agree with your points, if not always how you convey them, this is unecessary.
Don't be absurd. If Paul wants to go unnoticed, he'll wear stylish orange and black framed glasses.Hmm. Paul going to the wedding has got me thinking. Obviously he's a reasonably well known public face, so him getting an invitation isn't completely outside the realm of possibility. But I wonder about the rest of the team. If Paul's going to give Dick moral support, then he's also going to want to bring Wally. But how do you sneak a midwestern high school student nobody into the the biggest celebrity wedding in recent Gotham history. Perhaps some sort of disguise will be in order?
Also, why do I foresee it ending with Paul having to subdue a drunk Dick and Wally before they cause a scene?
@Mr Zoat, will any of the other Team members be going to the wedding? And if they are, how?
As I understand it, Paul has realised that he has no actual friends, and he doesn't really like any of his peers (At the very least, he looks down on them). He doesn't have any family. Desperate for companionship, he's decided to get a significant other, because by conventional standards that's considered a high level of intimacy.
What he doesn't realise, I think, is that typically long lasting romantic relationships start as platonic ones, and like all fulfilling relationships take time to develop. Years, I'd say. So he's chasing after the end result instead of planting the seeds of true friendship.
Yet another example of asexual superiority.![]()
It's really not a hard concept to grasp. He lied, then he dug deeper because people don't like admitting they've made a mistake. This is a thing that happens all the time, and for all his weirdness, Paul is still only human.
Peak human, sure, but still human.
You would be more persuasive here if you explained your fundamental philosophical axioms first instead of skipping right to the absolutes.
It was made extreme so that it'd be obvious. It doesn't have to have anything to do with Paul, the goal was to show that such statements as "lies are always bad" are foolish. If there's no heaven then she won't get to be disapointed since she won't exist after dying, if there's a heaven she's disapointed until she does get to heaven (or hell depending on how the belief system would work in that scenario). As you can see in either case telling the truth has just made things worse. Oh no he's definitely being an asshole no doubt there. Sometimes lies are acceptable to tell for someone good or tell me would you tell a small child that Santa doesn't exist because it's the truth?
Fact is it's only his opinion that he convinced her with, but it is what she asked of him. And are you really gonna try to debate about heaven existence, really? No one knows and that's all there is to say on the matter.
Look at you telling your opinions as if they were reality... You talk of manipulation and being patronizing as if they're inherently bad things (hint: they're not). There's a lot of situations where doing either or both is perfectly acceptable and even the right thing to do, in fact it's often the case when dealing with children and some other groups of people. Lies are generally condemned because lies are generally used to to serve nefarious causes, but they're not inherently a bad thing like you seem to believe. Ok here's a classic for you, if you were in Nazi Germany and hiding jews in your home, would you tell the officer that they're there when he asks you if you're hiding jews in your home?
That'd imply that logic is being used rather than a call to feelings.
I'm assuming you're joking, but in case you're not. What would make you say that he doesn't have actual friends? If he didn't like his peers he wouldn't be able to use his ring as effectively to help them, in a lot of the choices he has made stem from the fact that he likes his peers.
As far as I know lots (if not most) relationships start quickly (0-2 weeks), after meeting the person, it coming originating from a deep friendship or years of knowing one another is something you're more likely to see in rom coms.
What is there to explain? Lying is bad, and truth is good. Such is is the way of the universe. There are absolutes in the universe that you do not question.
I think you're having a fundamental error in picking up the context of the story. If that's the case, I'll try and help break it down for you:You misunderstand. It is not the fact that he lied; it is what he lied about. He lied about his age, something that is really stupid. For some dumb reason, he thought that lying about being eighteen was a good idea. Why? We will never know, and that is what is so dumb.
Please don't double post. Secondly, please don't be silly. We've a direct viewpoint into the characters motivations. His stated desire to have a girlfriend is because he's feeling horny.You know, I just thought of something: what if Paul wants a girlfriend because he is tired of giving off the impression that he is romantically attracted to girls that are way too young for him.
Zatanna had to be let down, but at least Grayven's not trying to lead her on like Paul is.
I'm assuming you're joking, but in case you're not. What would make you say that he doesn't have actual friends?
If he didn't like his peers he wouldn't be able to use his ring as effectively to help them, in a lot of the choices he has made stem from the fact that he likes his peers.
As far as I know lots (if not most) relationships start quickly (0-2 weeks), after meeting the person, it coming originating from a deep friendship or years of knowing one another is something you're more likely to see in rom coms.
He's got John!
From a narrative standpoint he initially omitted his age because this had to be a young justice story. After that he lied because he was afraid he would be removed from the team and implying he was 18 was what he went with to not be removed from said team.You misunderstand. It is not the fact that he lied; it is what he lied about. He lied about his age, something that is really stupid. For some dumb reason, he thought that lying about being eighteen was a good idea. Why? We will never know, and that is what is so dumb.
What makes it even worse is that Grayven, for all of his assholishness and manipulativeness and infuriating arrogance, is still more honest than Paul about this. And nothing happened to him at all. I mean, Zatanna had to be let down, but at least Grayven's not trying to lead her on like Paul is.
What is there to explain? Lying is bad, and truth is good. Such is is the way of the universe. There are absolutes in the universe that you do not question.
Being dishonest is always a harmful thing. If you want to lie, you have to accept that you will be hurting yourself (for committing a sin) and the other person (for manipulating them). If you can live with that, then by all means, hide those Jews. Nobody cares if you hurt Nazis.
Patronizing, on the other hand, is a form of insulting someone, where you pretend to be nice when in reality, you are just asserting your superiority over them. Not fun.
And yes, I would totally tell a little girl that Santa Claus wasn't real. Because I am not a asshole that lies to little girls.
What Rem was saying is that, yeah, he is friends with his other teammates, but he has nobody his age he can talk to.
Don't double post, use the edit button.You know, I just thought of something: what if Paul wants a girlfriend because he is tired of giving off the impression that he is romantically attracted to girls that are way too young for him.
I'm half-joking.
What friends does he have? The team? They're a bunch of kids, and he's barely interacted with them lately. When he does, it's mostly business or mentoring. He's certainly not keeping up with what they're doing with their lives; Wally caught him off guard with his progress in alchemy IIRC.
At the very least, he doesn't trust them with his problems. Part of this is that he has too many secrets, but he's also on an entirely different level in terms of maturity.
I was mostly referring to the other Leaguers and myriad adult heroes, who he never really interacts with. When he does, either they view him as a teenager or he looks down on them.
Damn. He's striking out left and right.
I'm not sure if you're just messing up with us of if it's really what you are like. But there's no such things as absolutes you actually have to explain why you believe something is X.
See I'm confused to deal with one such as you, either you're fucking with me or it's way of thinking that's fucked up. How in the world do you translate telling little girls that Santa isn't real as not being a shit bag.
Prove it.There is an absolute good and evil in the universe. No matter what religion you believe in, what is good and what is evil remain the same.
Them beings teenagers hasn't stopped him from considering them as friends in the first place, even if we'd have issues with doing that in his place, it doesn't seem to be a problem for him. I have to assume that a lot of the time we don't see is spent with them or with dealing with Nabu.What friends does he have? The team? They're a bunch of kids, and he's barely interacted with them lately. When he does, it's mostly business or mentoring. He's certainly not keeping up with what they're doing with their lives; Wally caught him off guard with his progress in alchemy IIRC.
At the very least, he doesn't trust them with his problems. Part of this is that he has too many secrets, but he's also on an entirely different level in terms of maturity.
I was mostly referring to the other Leaguers and myriad adult heroes, who he never really interacts with. When he does, either they view him as a teenager or he looks down on them (The other Lanterns, J'onn, Supes).
I'd love to know what rom coms you're watching. I'm not even being sarcastic; usually those shows are really shallow.
But I'll concede that you might be right. I based my assumption on the people I know, which in hindsight is a logical fallacy. My apologies.
Firstly: I made no claims as to what love is. Secondly: You're using self referential to prove itself. Try again.Well, once you can prove that love isn't just sex + close friendship. Oh wait...
Well, I know that God exists because the Catholic church He founded exists and is still going around spreading the Good News. Since God is basically goodness and light and love in the form of an omnipotent being, He would have a pretty good idea of knowing right from wrong. But that's not the answer you would accept is it?
Well, I also know that moral relativism - the belief that all beliefs are valid and equal to each other - is complete rubbish. And if that fact is true, then that means there are some morals all human beings have in common. Could it be that those values - the freedom to worship, the right to live happily and in peace, the right to have something to call your own, the right to be treated with respect and dignity as all human beings should be - are related to an absolute good and evil?
Good point. Topic dropped.OK I'm pretty sure we've gone heavily into de-rail territory by now.
Seems to be less about Paul's age lie and more about truth and lies in general now.
Which isn't the point of this thread.
Ah well that explains that. I think we can all agree to safely ignore the ravings of the extremely religious.
No need to be rude.Ah well that explains that. I think we can all agree to safely ignore the ravings of the extremely religious.
Well, once you can prove that love isn't just sex + close friendship. Oh wait...
Well, I know that God exists because the Catholic church He founded exists and is still going around spreading the Good News. Since God is basically goodness and light and love in the form of an omnipotent being, He would have a pretty good idea of knowing right from wrong. But that's not the answer you would accept is it?
Well, I also know that moral relativism - the belief that all beliefs are valid and equal to each other - is complete rubbish. And if that fact is true, then that means there are some morals all human beings have in common. Could it be that those values - the freedom to worship, the right to live happily and in peace, the right to have something to call your own, the right to be treated with respect and dignity as all human beings should be - are related to an absolute good and evil?
Calling relationship enthusiasts 'vocal' is misleading, especially as it implies others providing comparatively more subdued input are 'not vocal'. It's more accurate to say they are 'overly vocal' and positively inclined, while the 'average' audience members undoubtedly have more varied and overall less positive opinions. Though of course that's only to be expected. The shipping demographic tends to be extremely passionate, expressive, and outspoken.Beyond the fact that he seems to enjoy writing it and the vast majority of his vocal audience enjoys reading it, right? Because as far as excuses go, that one is pretty good.
Nothing in the post was advocating a decrease in character interactions. Rather, it was proposing that less time be spent on creating and detailing (occasionally notably unlikely) scenarios where women almost become engaged with Zoat's SI in romance.