- Location
- USA
Maybe go like Persona 4 with Japanese figuresWhich mythology would you rather see?
I am a fan of Norse, but that's getting oversaturated as well. Maybe Celtic perhaps. Haven't seen that done.
Maybe go like Persona 4 with Japanese figuresWhich mythology would you rather see?
I am a fan of Norse, but that's getting oversaturated as well. Maybe Celtic perhaps. Haven't seen that done.
Ishtar is active in the world (if we use Sandman material), and works as a stripper, following her divine mandate. And we all should probably be grateful that she likes her "love" domain more than her "war" domain. She could probably reveal her divine nature relatively easily, maybe issue an invitation for J'aarkin to get a visa? Or she could give Zatarra lessons in using love power.Now, while Zoat has said that worship doesn't matter in power terms. I can't help but wonder how many gods might be inspired to clean up their act a little, if only for the added attention and glory.
This is a classic No True Scotsman fallacy. Christians, broadly, claim that the Bible is the word of God. The Bible endorses a variety of things, including the position that having gay sex is an abomination. Modern acceptance of non-lesbian gay relations is in contradiction to what the Bible states. You may or may not agree with people's specific reaction to the meaning of this, but they are basing their opinion on their most reliable source of knowledge for God's will.Anyone who has the temerity to walk around calling people "fags" and then call themselves "Christians" should do the rest of us a favour and stop lying to both themselves and everyone else around them. Doesn't matter what they say, it's not showing up at church that makes you a Christian its following Gods will.
The thing is, although DC Christianity is a weird mashup of different bits of various Christian sects, it is all based on what actual people believe. Aside from embellishing on what goes on in Hell, eternal torture for bad deeds is something that actual people believe. I have first-hand experience with people who believe in an afterlife system that would be mostly indistinguishable from DC Christianity. You may not like this portrayal, but it is in no sense a parody, because of the number of people who believe in virtually identical things.Funnily enough, none of the Christians I know believes that hell takes the form of a literal lake of fire. We also believe that the only way you can end up there is by your own actions. That you can't condemn the soul of an innocent child to the aforementioned lake of fire by screwing up a ritual and neither do demons use souls as raw materials to form extra pitchforks to use on the next group to get sent down.
The fact that you are using DC Christianity as something to compare other religion too is exactly why i have a problem with it. It's easy to go "its just fiction it doesn't matter" but it still affects your opinion of it, even if you don't notice. subliminal propaganda if you will. You're not associating Christianity with the faith I believe in, but rather whatever the media or movies or stories shout the loudest and we all know how great they are at accuracy.
The fact that you consider this a form of persectution is about as funny as it is tone deaf. Yes, people are not banned from making an occasional joke at Christianity's expense, and so some people make the occasional joke that is still based on actual real world things that actual Christians do. It would actually make for a funny joke if I were to make up a Christian saying that they consider the occasional mild joke at Christianity's expense to be a form of persecution worth mentioning within the same thread where a gay man details how he was continually abused both mentally and physically due to his being gay. I'm just gonna repeat that this is fucking tone deaf.No in the western world Christians are generally not subjected to violence (the rest of the world isn't relevant to the discussion). There is however, a degree of constant low level social denigration of the Christian faith. Its an accepted part of society that there is nothing wrong with the occasional joke at Christianity's expense
Think about what Christian character type is most common in books/films. It's not the nice neighbourly person who offers to help you and keep you in your prayers. Its the angry firebrand who's off their head, shouting about blasphemy or preaching on the streets about how God will.
Mrs Sheldon is a loving mother who cares for her family and her faith, a faith which is constantly ridiculed to public applause. The Catholic sign of the cross is used more often as a joke to say "help i'm screwed" than it is as a religious symbol. The Book of Morman, created by the same guys as south park, is a musical that actively mocks the Morman faith.
Mormons believe basically no one goes to hell (that's one of the reasons the keep baptising dead people and getting in trouble at Jewish graveyards).
EDIT: So, anyone know if the JLU belong to this universe, or what number earth they belong to?
Which mythology would you rather see?
I am a fan of Norse, but that's getting oversaturated as well. Maybe Celtic perhaps. Haven't seen that done.
EDIT: So, anyone know if the JLU belong to this universe, or what number earth they belong to?
Well that honestly depends cause that could just be blind faith in something. Like faith doesn't have to be blind belief in something merely because of what you think. I mean I may not have blind faith in something but with respect i believe i can have faith in someone or something.Is it even faith anymore? Like, when you're god is literally right next to you sharing a drink? I've always been under the impression that the very definition of faith is "trusting something to be true without any evidence."
Faith is in some ways an emotion, so that makes sense.Well that honestly depends cause that could just be blind faith in something. Like faith doesn't have to be blind belief in something merely because of what you think. I mean I may not have blind faith in something but with respect i believe i can have faith in someone or something.
I don't believe that I've made specific reference to bestiality.The British Government and Royal Family are literally baby killing and fornicating with animals.
What makes you think they would have helped? A lot of pagan gods are dicks.Even the Germanic adaptation or Christianity away from pacifism, into a demi-symcratic warrior faith, doesn't make any sense, if they were already getting legitimate help from the Germanic pantheon.
Yes, exactly! And if you're born Kryptonian you can fire lasers out of your eyes.It's like the ultimate expression of power disparity. If your powerful or rich enough you can have your sister brought back.
I didn't know you were married. Congratulations!How nice that my marriage should have to depend on your opinion. Yeah, I'll show you all the respect we've been shown.
Well... No, you can, but it does come across as a bit 'no-true-Scotsman'.You can't claim that something isn't part of a faith when the majority of its adherents say it is.
I know you're just trying to lighten the mood and possibly move onto other subjects, but this comes across as flippant and dismissive.
Not... Any more.
As Sir Terrence Pratchett wrote: "Remember the atrocity committed against us which excuses the atrocity we are about to commit!"If "as much strength as can be mustered" means throwing out the possibility of a real discussion, then no. That righteous indignation, "my cause justifies my harsh treatment of others," is, ironically enough, the very attitude that fuels hate crimes. "You are despicable, so I am free to attack you," said every crusader, every Inquisitor, every gay-basher, every Jihadist suicide bomber.
Well... No, you can, but it does come across as a bit 'no-true-Scotsman'.
12EDIT: So, anyone know if the JLU belong to this universe, or what number earth they belong to?
A really really hardcore atheist could become a sentient ghost, but usually they discover that souls exist and default to their culture's norm.Though, now that begs the question of what happens to atheists when they die in DC (unless it's already been asked and answered). They don't follow a religion so they've got no set destination once they kick the bucket but they do still have souls. Do the various gods just do a lottery for them when they die?
Not being Christian, gay or American, there's very little of substance I could say about that part of his life experience.I know you're just trying to lighten the mood and possibly move onto other subjects, but this comes across as flippant and dismissive.
Not quite. It's not "without any evidence." The Babel fish doesn't destroy faith. It's "without seeing the result beforehand." You can and should have some reason to put your trust in principle X instead of principle Y, otherwise you're just acting randomly. But you don't know or understand everything, and you still act.I've always been under the impression that the very definition of faith is "trusting something to be true without any evidence."
Um...no. We tried but...well, lovely land of the free. Anyway, that was the end of something very happy for me. Which is why I got pissed off enough that I didn't word it better.
Having read the new power rangers comic I cant stop laughing when ever I hear the word sheeple.There are no True Scotsmen. Scotland itself is an elaborate ruse by the Roman illuminati. Wake up sheeple!
Which lord would that be? Greek? Norse?Oh lord I knew when we hit the religion arc things might get a bit heated.
Eh, not so much.
I doubt we can stop Mr Zoat's update schedule
Yes, and that reason should be based on evidence or reasoning. Insufficient evidence to be certain in your beliefs is not sufficient reason to never act at all. If someone gave me a thousand to one odds betting on the outcome of a fair coin flip, I would still put money in despite lacking certainty in the favorable outcome. If you wait to be absolutely certain before taking any action, you would never do anything, but that isn't license to assign absolute certainty to your preferred outcome.You can and should have some reason to put your trust in principle X instead of principle Y, otherwise you're just acting randomly. But you don't know or understand everything, and you still act.
Generalizing from fictional evidence is in general not a good idea. Authors write events to make a good story, not to accurately reflect reality.Indiana Jones didn't know exactly what would happen when he took the Leap of Faith, but he had instructions that had previously proved to be accurate, and which implied that he should step out. He acted based on his trust in those instructions - not with no reason, but with insufficient knowledge to have acted based on knowledge alone. Then, after acting, he learned why, which is also a normal part of faith.
While I'm 100% behind the intent of this post, the crusades weren't anything like as bad as how people talk about them, taken in context.
I don't think they believe homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to marry people of the opposite sex, though.A vile opinion should be attacked with as much strength as can be mustered. As much as I would strenuously disagree with someone saying that black people or Jews are subhuman, so too will I say that believing that gay people do not deserve the same rights as straight people is despicable and evil.
Leviticus covers three things:This is a classic No True Scotsman fallacy. Christians, broadly, claim that the Bible is the word of God. The Bible endorses a variety of things, including the position that having gay sex is an abomination. Modern acceptance of non-lesbian gay relations is in contradiction to what the Bible states.
Of course, it's really weird trying to fit religions onto a template of being all about the afterlife.
For understandable reasons, modern real world religions are all about how people should treat each other and conduct themselves while they are alive. The afterlife is at best a dim carrot/stick/explanation for comfort.
That's the actual real problem Themis is going to have with conversion. What does Hades have to say about how people should act, should treat each other, should make ethical decisions? Not a whole lot. He's just there to clean up the garbage.
Kinda, yeah. As far as I'm aware, there isn't a clause in the Bible saying that all these laws hold only up until you understand germ theory and sanitation, after which time you can do whatever. That there are survival related reasons for these laws doesn't change that they are codified as the word of the creator of the universe as rules that everyone should follow on pain of death or similar punishment. So while I did find your post interesting, it's not particularly relevant to what I was talking about.
Because the situation seems ripe for a Crusade. A united Abrahamic Crusade, with superhero support, summoned angels, magical monks and all that fun stuff.