I was also trying to depict the SI as having trouble relating to regular people, but I think I may have overshot the mark a little.
Contrary to most of the other comments, I don't think you overshot the mark at all. If anything, from my perspective you fell a little bit short of it because this chapter could have easily been a chapter in my own life. The SI's thought processes don't seem alien at all, and this kind of relationship trouble doesn't come across to me as being the result of having trouble relating to regular people.
You did. It's almost like reading xenofiction at this point.
This is really offputting. Real people DO, in fact, act like this. Real people DO, in fact, occasionally make blunders in pursuit of well-meaning ends. Real people DO, in fact, sometimes overanalyze things. It doesn't even require a psychiatric disorder, contrary to what some comments have suggested.
I suspect part of the reason this seems so jarring is that we as readers are CONDITIONED to expect fictional worlds to be unrealistically perfect, since everything is scripted in advance and the power of narrative controls the outcomes of events. And when things do go wrong, there's still a sense of control and direction.
Given the luxury of sitting here reading a work of fiction, it's easy to say "yeah, that's not what he should have done." But in another situation, where you're already in the middle of the discussion, mistakes can happen. Lapses in judgment aren't unrealistic. They aren't alien. They're just not what we usually expect when we're reading a story.
True in terms of 'how things should be,' but quite a lot of people (regardless of sex, race, or most other considerations), no matter how old, are not really mature enough for that to work.
On the one hand, you're right. Maturity is something dreadfully lacking in most people. On the other hand, second-guessing someone's stated preference, ESPECIALLY if it's on the basis of something as bloody shallow as their gender, is a really awful thing to do, and assertions that you SHOULD do it only perpetuate the problem in the first place.
Because what happens if you second-guess it, and they actually WERE telling the truth? Then you may have concealed something that was actually important to them. In the end, you may end up causing more damage than if you had actually LISTENED to them the first time.
Paul apparently doesn't desire sex or romance
He DOES desire them, but he also understands the complications that can arise from intimate relationships. More strongly than he wants to experience sex or romance, he wants to protect people. He very strongly doesn't want to hurt people he cares about, which is why he's -- I won't say "slow"... "deliberate" is a better word -- why he's deliberate about his actions when these things arise.
This kind of attitude is exactly what's annoying Eris.
Do you have empathic vision too?
Why yes, actually. It's called "not being a sociopath." I can see how other people feel on the surface, and given time to understand the person I can get a feeling for how they feel deep down. And the older I get, and the more experience I get seeing how other people think and act, the better I am at it.