Many state will probably heavily doubt our strength afterwards and think that our milion army is barely holding and we are in a terrible state.
Base Influence: 5 Influence, 2 Authority
Naval Status (Yllython Mor): 8 (Poor)
Naval Status (Saffron Sea): 2 (Anemic)
Naval Status (Salt Sea): 4 (Weak)
Naval Status (Monsoon Sea): 6 (Poor)
(Combined Yllython+Saffron Naval: 10 [Average])
Total Naval Score: 20
Professional Army Formations:
Iron Flower Banner Company (Pike & Shot [crossbow]) - Deployed to Western Wall Front
Heaven's Hawk Banner Company (Heavy Cavalry) - Deployed to Western Wall Front
Thunder Plateau Front: 670,000 men & Dragon General Dafydd.
Western Wall Front: 270,000 men & Both Banner Companies
Highlander Front: 30,000 Men
Reserve: 30,000 Men
Treasury Status: 5.5/10
Income: +.3
Expensive Actions subtract 1 from treasury status, Profitable actions add 1 to it. Very is x2, Extremely is x3, Ruinously/Insanely is x4.
Income adds itself to the Treasury Status every 5 years.
Provinces and Loyalty
Core: Rock Solid
Memory of Spirits: Rock Solid
Txolla: Unshakable
Hathytta: Decently Loyal
Western Wall: In Rebellion
Greenshore: Solid
Tinshore: Rock Solid
Thunder Plateau: Under Foreign Occupation
Client States:
Tin Tribes
-
Opinions of you:
Khemetri: 4/10 [C] R
Magyar: 7/10
Ealam: 7/10
Vynta: 6/10
Ruma: 5/10
Pamplona: 8/10
Abyss: 5/10
Hung: 8/10 [C]
Rexum Germanum: 5/10
-Hasum 4/10
-Behryvar 4/10
-Ochrur ?/10
Tarta: 5/10
Styrmyr: 5/10
Amber Road: 8/10 [C], 2/5 [A]
Norsca: 4/10
Berba: 5/10
Hellas: 3/10 [C] R
Pulska: 3/5
Prestige Rankings:
<30 = Minor Power
30-59 = Major Power
60-99 = Great Power
100+ = Super Power
Melkut Ymaryn: 65
International relations aren't about "who started it first" (especially while the rivalry is mild enough not to have--yet--descended into enmity), but about keeping strategically important nations as happy as is possible. Treat them like they don't exist, and they break away and rival you when you go too far against their interests--but on the other hand, make continued considerations, and they'll be confident in your long-term goodwill and drop the rivalry. It's our choice, and we are choosing poorly.
And, I mean, what's the alternative. We conquer all the way to the not!Suez? Either that leaves us even more exposed, or we conquer the peninsula (which Aranfan's already warned us about).
This is so true. We should do the traditional thing and pay the tribute in nothing but salt.In days of yore, when the Melkut Ymaryn was mighty but not yet foolish, it would occasionally happen that a warlord would arise on the steppes. They would unite a few tribes, use that to force more nomads to their banner, until they had a horde that could threaten more settled lands. And so the barbarians would swagger down from the north making demands.
The wise Ymaryn would send a most splendid embassy to meet them. They would present gifts both rich and kingly, they would call them Emperor or Khan howsoever they wished to be styled, they would smile and they would bow. The warlord would ride away boasting of the tribute and submission he had extracted, the Ymaryn would shrug and go back to more important business.
It is unusual that the king of our most ancient peer in civilisation should demand to be treated like an upstart horse lord but these things sometimes happen with new dynasties. They'll probably get over it in a couple of generations.
[X] Submit (20 Prestige transferred to KMT, -.2 Treasury, -4 Influence, -1 Authority, Revaunchists gravely weakened, personal action unavailable next turn)
You misunderstand the point here.
The point is THEY want to be rivals to US. From their perspective, us being powerful is in and of itself bad for their set-up. You want to make friends with a power that does not see friendship as being in their interest.
Trying to be friends with people who don't want friendship is a good way to waste alot of energy.
How exactly does that leave us "exposed"? Exposed to who and what? So far Arabia has been so insignificant it hasn't even come up in PoC and even in the real world, the great empires of the region had nothing to gain by controlling Arabia and nothing to fear from leaving the locals mostly to their own devices. Except for that one time when the Romans and Persians beat the stuffing out of each-other so bad that a new Arabian polity was able to conquer most of both in a couple generations...
And yes, conquering all the way to not!Suez is the path of least resistance here. The geography of the world has shifted and in this new world we are missing one of the most important areas for an Anatolian or Mesopotamian empire to control, and we are both.
Now, it would be nice to complete our economic and strategic geography by creating a pre-modern customs union an alliance system, but those are very modern ideas and the Ymaryn empire is still working in a late iron age context.
fasquardon
Short to middle term I actually really want us to settle Cyprus - it is neutral on the map, so we should be able to get it per diplomacy, and is ideally positioned for a naval base.
Not Cyprus is presently a client of KMT. They are technically independent, but they know who their masters are.
Short to middle term I actually really want us to settle Cyprus - it is neutral on the map, so we should be able to get it per diplomacy, and is ideally positioned for a naval base.
While technically independent, it is a de facto client state of the Khem.
Cyprus is a petty kingdom currently sphered by KMT. It passes back and forth between the suzerainty of them and Hellas.
The point is THEY want to be rivals to US. From their perspective, us being powerful is in and of itself bad for their set-up. You want to make friends with a power that does not see friendship as being in their interest.
Trying to be friends with people who don't want friendship is a good way to waste alot of energy.
The fewer the natural boundaries (and the more stretched out our territory), the more exposed we are. We can conquer not!Arabia to get those boundaries, but the QM has already warned us of that.How exactly does that leave us "exposed"? Exposed to who and what?
In days of yore, when the Melkut Ymaryn was mighty but not yet foolish, it would occasionally happen that a warlord would arise on the steppes. They would unite a few tribes, use that to force more nomads to their banner, until they had a horde that could threaten more settled lands. And so the barbarians would swagger down from the north making demands.
The wise Ymaryn would send a most splendid embassy to meet them. They would present gifts both rich and kingly, they would call them Emperor or Khan howsoever they wished to be styled, they would smile and they would bow. The warlord would ride away boasting of the tribute and submission he had extracted, the Ymaryn would shrug and go back to more important business.
It is unusual that the king of our most ancient peer in civilisation should demand to be treated like an upstart horse lord but these things sometimes happen with new dynasties. They'll probably get over it in a couple of generations.
[X] Submit (20 Prestige transferred to KMT, -.2 Treasury, -4 Influence, -1 Authority, Revaunchists gravely weakened, personal action unavailable next turn)
In days of yore, when the Melkut Ymaryn was mighty but not yet foolish, it would occasionally happen that a warlord would arise on the steppes. They would unite a few tribes, use that to force more nomads to their banner, until they had a horde that could threaten more settled lands. And so the barbarians would swagger down from the north making demands.
The wise Ymaryn would send a most splendid embassy to meet them. They would present gifts both rich and kingly, they would call them Emperor or Khan howsoever they wished to be styled, they would smile and they would bow. The warlord would ride away boasting of the tribute and submission he had extracted, the Ymaryn would shrug and go back to more important business.
It is unusual that the king of our most ancient peer in civilisation should demand to be treated like an upstart horse lord but these things sometimes happen with new dynasties. They'll probably get over it in a couple of generations.
On the other hand, the fact they view us as a rival WILL color their actions, along with perspective, and honestly I don't know how to change that status.Rivalry isn't a thing one wants (maybe with rare exceptions). The Khem didn't start off as rivals--in fact they had positive opinion--despite our conflicting trade interests. It's only when they took serious damage from those interests that they actually considered us a rival.
A rival is one who is a serious threat to you. They may have significant advantages over you, and that is frightening. But they can also make a peace offering (as with the 1608 trade deal). Show enough goodwill over a long period of time, and their strength ceases to be a threat, and becomes an asset: the former rival is firmly in your corner.
The Ymaryn caused them damage during the Kus famine without any consideration, without so much as throwing them a bone. This will make a resolution harder, but we have a 500 year timeline. Befriending them is inevitable as long as we don't give up at the start, or worse, intentionally piss them off at the start for no good reason.
Remember the Ymaryn issues with pride? This is part of that equation.