Remove ads

Warhammer Fantasy: Divided Loyalties - an Advisor's Quest

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
Reader mode
Boney did post an Everchosen tourney graph (I think it had Archeon in it), right? Because taking that into account it'd be an extremely good time (as in, more than ever) to be able to distinguish blessings from a legitimate God from a Chaos God.
 
Wiadi said:
Hm. @Boney I understand if you're disinclined to clarify such details in advance of the vote concluding, but if you're willing, I'd like to know at least the broad strokes of how Truth would be implemented if it won. In specific, I'm worried that if there's a "do nothing" option for it (e.g. by adding "go divine-signature-hunting" to our turn-planning action list) then we'll just end up relitigating this vote constantly as those opposed to Truth attempt to prevent any actual followthrough, & unlike with the Liber Mortis the existence of future decision points like "which god(s) do we go after" would prevent just having the followup happen automatically.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I don't think this is a problem because there are several voters(myself included) who are happy with either option, but lean towards faith. That said I do think it will take a while because it is competing for AP slots.
 
@Boney, does Mathilde believe that a diety would be able to manipulate a copied fragment of their power if they noticed she had it? Because it occurs to me that having a bunch of divine power around could very well make it easier for the deities it belongs to to act (either by manipulating the power directly, or using it as a channel to feed more into the world).
 
NSMS said:
@Boney, does Mathilde believe that a diety would be able to manipulate a copied fragment of their power if they noticed she had it? Because it occurs to me that having a bunch of divine power around could very well make it easier for the deities it belongs to to act (either by manipulating the power directly, or using it as a channel to feed more into the world).
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Try It And Find Out. :V
 
I just had the dumbest realisation.

One of the oldest and most persistent tags on this thread has been "Ranald is real", right?

Well, we just scientifically proved he is in-universe.
 
I got a weird feeling that Ranald did not notice. Don't have a good argument for it. But just a feeling.
 
[X] Truth

If Mathilde, who objectively has the best understanding of Ranald accessible to us [the readers] can't tell how he'd react, I feel there's limited usefulness on speculating on the emotional reaction.

I'd rather just flip that coin, grab what might be the biggest break in our life and go for it.
 
Last edited:
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Voting is open
Remove ads
Back
Top