The question is will ensou have Taylor yell out the attack name when she launch those blackhole bombs even though yelling out the name does nothing extra?
For the record, "base of the tail" is fanon. In canon, Leviathan's core was in the chest, about where the heart would be for a humanoid figure.
Actually I was making a reference to when Naruto attacked Gaara at the base of his tail by shoving a kunai with a explosive note there.
Would most people even get that? I don't see horse racing fans or commentators as the sort to really catch decades old references.
Last time I heard a number quoted, it was approximately the mass of our moon. ....currently realizing that that technically isn't a number.
Nope, not really. Assuming the center of mass didn't move, the gravitic forces would be identical. As long as you are further from the center of the gravity-generating mass in question's center of mass than the surface of said mass, it doesn't matter to you what shape, size, or density the mass takes on. You will experience identical forces due to it.
Not quite. If you are close to (but still outside) the sphere you are going to get some side vectors, granted given a sphere of even density those side vectors would cancel themselvs out, but that still results in a gravitational pull of slightly less than you'd get from a point source of the same total mass.
Consider the non-point-source gravitational attractor as a sphere of point sources evenly distributed. The sources further away are mitigated more by the inverse square law. The sources that are not directly down are mitigated by the cosine of their angle away from directly down, with the sine portion of the vector being cancelled or balanced by the source at the the same distance and angle on the other side of the sphere (think of it like the L1 Lagrange point)... and that's how gravity works when we consider a planet-sized planetary mass and not a planetary- or stellar-mass black hole. A black hole certainly reduces the inverse square law and cosine vector differences, but it doesn't truly eliminate them.
Right up until you get peeps talking about RL physics and maths that lead to such things like Anti-Gravity.
It's nice to know that the beginning of Farscape is actually possible by modern physics (dice I loved that show...)
You've worded this poorly and it could be interpreted in several different ways. While it's entirely possible you intended the correct meaning, I'm still going to correct you. Wormholes remain a purely theoretical phenomenon and have never been observed in nature or produced in a lab.
I see, thank you for the heads up and info-blast.
Yah, you could even say TheUnicorn is hilariously wrong, as became obvious when I sat down to calculate the numbers.
I know your pain, there; I make similar silly mistakes for much the same reason, and then kick myself when I go back and re-research them. I just had the Gauss's Law thing come up a few months ago and was reminded of it. Though I'd still forgotten the name. My brain remembers it as an image of concentric hollow shells and the notion that what's actually inside them is irrelevant to the surrounding forces...which isn't a good CATEGORIZATION term. >_<
