Threads Of Destiny(Eastern Fantasy, Sequel to Forge of Destiny)

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
[X] Focus the speech on how disputes, though inevitable, can be solved to everyone's satisfaction through words.
 
[X] Focus the speech on how disputes, though inevitable, can be solved to everyone's satisfaction through words.
 
[X] Focus the speech on what can be built together leaning toward the promise of the future over the rough start
[X] Focus the speech on how disputes, though inevitable, can be solved to everyone's satisfaction through words.

A vote for either. Not swayed yet either way.

 
So, the "failed" meeting place project isn't catastrophic, but it does put us in the back foot. If it had succeeded, we would likely had gotten a +1 bonus instead of a -1 malus.
Then we would have had the Emerald Seas Nobility at 6. That would have made any roll regarding them almost certain, as well as given us a good buffer in case we had to spend an allied faction's favorability to increase the more problematic faction's (MoI). We can still do it, but much more sparsely.
The Polar Theocracy would have been at 3, which would have given a good margin to negotiate with them. As it is now, we have to tread carefully with them least we lose further favorability and they fall to the negative.

This just proves that taking on the challange of the shared meeting hall construction was the right choice though, despite the unlucky result. All those benefits with a 80% chance was a sound risk, and the situation is still manageable.
Really, the worst part wil be that everyone we talk to will comment on how barebones the place is, many with a mocking attitude as well. That will be annoying.

I agree that gettig the MoI to +1 has to be the first priority. Not only for the summit final outcome, but because we are going to need their collaboration when we are investigating the sabotage. So we have to increase their favorability at the very start.

Trying to brush off the meeting place being incomplete will end badly. We overreached and paid the price, so we have to own the consequences.
Furthermore, creating a mutually recognized dispute settling system/institution is also one of our objectives for the summit, as adviced by Xuan Shi and requested by the Seared Lands. This approach puts the discussion in that direction.

[X] Focus the speech on how disputes, though inevitable, can be solved to everyone's satisfaction through words.
 
[X] Focus the speech on how disputes, though inevitable, can be solved to everyone's satisfaction through words.
 
[X] Focus the speech on how disputes, though inevitable, can be solved to everyone's satisfaction through words.
 
[X] Focus the speech on how disputes, though inevitable, can be solved to everyone's satisfaction through words.
 
With that -1 ... yeah, I'm definitely still salty we resisted giving the MoI a sop earlier. Someone should review the pre-summit votes into a table; I'll do it eventually if no one else does.

[X] Focus the speech on what can be built together leaning toward the promise of the future over the rough start
 
[X] Focus the speech on what can be built together leaning toward the promise of the future over the rough start
[X] Focus the speech on how disputes, though inevitable, can be solved to everyone's satisfaction through words.
 
[X] Focus the speech on how disputes, though inevitable, can be solved to everyone's satisfaction through words.

Eh, don't care either way which one wins
 
[X] Focus the speech on what can be built together leaning toward the promise of the future over the rough start

I feel like a little gamble, let's double down on losing face baby!
 
One tally coming up
Adhoc vote count started by Neshuakadal on Jul 13, 2023 at 9:06 AM, finished with 69 posts and 40 votes.
 
[X] Focus the speech on what can be built together leaning toward the promise of the future over the rough start

wow, too late. just my luck today, huh.
 
Back
Top