I was going to say "we have the excuse of being Literally Sixteen" but our whole being heir thing happened in the first place because we could not possibly be as bad as Daemon... at fourteenIt really does smack of demanding attention the same way Daemon does, why do we even want to be demanding our own celebration except to deliberately try and upstage him? What purpose does this serve other than to look as immature as he is?
Also, what is with this demand for a celebration? Are we like Daemon and can't let other people have a thing without demanding our own immediately?
I don't care that much about the Celebration or the Peake issue TBH, and I am voting the [] Plan A Few Other Details because I prefer how it deals with Qooren visiting here, because as Somnic said "While Rhaenyra is heir, she has significant freedom of movement and a need to build up her support base with that freedom, so she can afford to fly back and forth, while Qoren is already the ruler of Dorne and will need to devote much of his effort to smoothing out the ruffled feathers and ensuring a peaceful integration."It really does smack of demanding attention the same way Daemon does, why do we even want to be demanding our own celebration except to deliberately try and upstage him? What purpose does this serve other than to look as immature as he is?
I should clarify that the Stepstones would be part of the Seven Kingdoms. And Daemon's hold will basically just be it's own little thing, sworn only to the crown.
Also, what is with this demand for a celebration? Are we like Daemon and can't let other people have a thing without demanding our own immediately?
- The Iron Throne will cede minor lands currently held by the Stormlander lords that rightfully belong to Dorne. In exchange, Dorne will do the same for those lands that belong to a number of Reacher houses.
OK, fair enough...Daemon's celebration is transparently an attempt to appease him. Insisting on having our own is entirely trying to upstage his and completely defeats the point of giving him one.
You have been ninjad xD
I hadn't seen your edit...
Otto saw some chance to sow a little instability for Crown and a little enrichment for his Reach friend and took it I guess.Oh god. Land swaps? That sounds like a recipe for disaster and destabilization. Who decides what is "righftfully" owned by whom? That leaves so much room for arguments, and for arguments to turn heated.
I'll vote for those. The celebration is too risky against Daemon's ego.
Yeah. That's called "our wedding".I think it is very fair we get our own feast. We are the heir of the realm and are getting betrothed. But not only that, our Betrothal is finally bringing Dorne into the fold. Aegon conquest of Westeros finally completed !
It is well worth reason for having a feast for it.
First of all, I agree that letting Daemon have his ego trip without anything that may upstage him and damage his massive but fragile ego is wise...
I mean, adding reverse visits so that Qooren regularly visits us (and his kids) in King's Landing, was always the point that was discussed here, even if it is via an informal agreement...Honestly, the other visitation formulation is kind of pointless? It's not seeking to alter the agreement, just trying to add reverse visits on the side.
I'd rather drop the clause entirely and replace it with an informal agreement than that.
Having 3 major celebrations in the same winter isn't reasonable though. That's going to be hellishly expensive and deplete stocks.First of all, I agree that letting Daemon have his ego trip without anything that may upstage him and damage his massive but fragile ego is wise...
But honestly, considering that IRL "regular" bethrothals in royal and noble households were already lavishly celebrated in medieval Europe... To have a huge and extravagant celebration for a bethrothal that will unify the 7 Kingdoms and that marks Viserys and Nyra's biggest political win is totally reasonable...
Yeah... Honestly this is one of the reasons why in the previous vote we should have pushed so that the wedding would have waited 24 months instead of 18... The chances of the wedding taking place in spring if we pick the higher end of the average winter duration instead of the lower end increases significantly...Having 3 major celebrations in the same winter isn't reasonable though. That's going to be hellishly expensive and deplete stocks.
And make people travel in pretty unpleasant weather, or stay for a very long while.Having 3 major celebrations in the same winter isn't reasonable though. That's going to be hellishly expensive and deplete stocks.
Having 3 major celebrations in the same winter isn't reasonable though. That's going to be hellishly expensive and deplete stocks.
Yeah... Honestly this is one of the reasons why in the previous vote we should have pushed so that the wedding would have waited 24 months instead of 18... The chances of the wedding taking place in spring if we pick the higher end of the average winter duration instead of the lower end increases significantly...
Would the geography make sense? I don't know if the Peake and Tarly lands are adjacent or not.Pssst, can we give all the lands that would have gone to the Peakes to the Tarly's instead? I'm asking for a friend...
Just to answer the question-I have changed the subject of the sentence for you. Though I wanted to know why nitpick this minor ambiguity? It is just a supporting argument, not a full plan and not even a term. No one for vote it or even reply to it and you also not use it in your plan. It is mainly there because supporting argument was said to affect the dice roll as bolded below.
Edit* Sorry for being unnecessarily hostile here @Simon_Jester Just have a rough few week. I left the original for posterity.
In fairness, to me this is basically just Rhaenyra being willing to distinguish between matters where she has to get her own way no matter what because you can't just let someone steal a whole-ass island from you without a fight, and matters where she wants something but not badly enough to threaten to spoil the whole deal.Rhaenyra when facing an erratically violent man backed by a large and vicious dragon: 😤
Rhaenyra when facing a pretty guy her age: 👉👈
I know it's her trying to be diplomatic with someone she'll need to build a good relationship with, but the deliberate misinterpretation is still funny to me
Yeah, well, Rhaenyra's different and hopes some day to rehabilitate her image.TBH I'd think that would be a pretty bad idea regardless. After Maegor no one likes Visenya, neither in Dorne nor the rest of Westeros.
My honest opinion on the Visenya thing is that, even if we eventually dig up conclusive evidence that she was Cool, Actually, and shout it from the rooftops loudly enough for most people of note in Westeros to hear, we still shouldn't name a daughter that. The point in the treaty wasn't about the sorcery, or the alleged kinslaying, or anything that could be proven wrong; it was about her committing indiscriminate, salt-the-earth, kingdom-wide slaughter against the Dornish. This has undeniably happened. It's just bad manners to marry a Martell and name a child after someone who did that to Dorne.If she didn't threaten to spoil the whole deal over not getting to name a daughter Visenya, she's not going to threaten it over this.
(Who knows, maybe if the next ten years of marriage go well, Qoren will relent on that point, maybe)