@Cetashwayo When would the tax break take effect? Next year or in three years with the next census? If it is the former, could we offer the latter as a compromise via a write-in?
It also makes sense from a narrative perspective. By then our grain shipments to Kymai would be done with and the Messapii tribute should hopefully be in place.
I think it's reasonable to have the tax break take effect at the end of the census period. The Metics would surely allow this without a motion, but they expect you to own up to it. This is an advantage of granting them their demands previously; they're more willing to trust you on your word.
Huh, you know after some further research it seems you were right and aristocrats were notably weakened in the aftermath of the war though I would be a bit more careful about ascribing that to the sortition and not other factors like loss of the war and thus influence and revenue. I certainly still feel comfortable describing even the mid republic as a oligarchy even if you say populist support was an important factor in gaining and keeping power. Still I feel it is important to point out here that the poor/lower classes we are talking about in both cases is largely limited to the urban poor while the poor of the countryside remained largely without influence (though exceptions of course happen with some Roman politicians managing some surprising feats due to it). Still I admit that while I feel comfortable in my education in regards to the period from the archaic age to the war the period after the war till Phillip/Alexander is something I seem to have inadvertently skipped mostly over (the only exception there that I can remember is the famous story about the ten thousand mercenaries stranded in Persia). Which is I guess why I am so often surprised by your stringent interpretation of stuff like citizens rights, mixing with local population etc. since in a lot of those issues greece was far more flexible both before and after this period.
(Though I still think you draw a bit too much inspiration from Athens itself which makes sense in regards to available sources and general narrative but in my opinion undervalues the uniqueness and often rather radical nature of Athens and its laws - for example the stringent law of limiting marriages to citizens was only implemented by Perikles himself which is why I find it a bit strange that we have it and that it seems to have already gained such universal standing/respect. I am to saying you should change it and it isn't liked you haven't allowed us to experiment with our social structure but as I said I sometimes feel like we are bound by traditions that are only becoming such during this period and which are often closely associated with Athens which for me personally isn't your standard greek city).
I would agree that it wasn't just sortition. I think that the political reforms were enabled by the post-war situation and the end of the tyrants. And yeah, the period between the end of the war and Alexander is
fascinating. It has a lot of real political experimentation; at one point Argos and Korinthos briefly form a
sympoliteia that is then broken up by Sparta at the end of the Korinthian War.
As for drawing on Athenai, I agree that early on this was a big issue and I'll take responsibility for it; even stuff like the existence of Metics is mostly an Athenian thing. To my defense, when I started writing in 2015 I didn't have the knowledge or source I do now. As for two-parent citizenship, I think that's a fair objection, but I would also be mindful of the fact that this is a very Eretrian thing. I don't believe I've stated that other Italiote cities have two-parent citizenship though if you found something to that effect let me know and I'll retcon it. The point is specifically how citizenship is sanctified in Eretria; in my mind the two-parent citizenship is an explicit decision to draw lines between classes and a relatively new development, but also one that is imbued with powerful symbolic energy in a city that treasures its history so much.
I also feel that people sometimes take my answers of "no" in the moment as answers of no in the long-term, which is less certain. I don't think that "universal citizenship" for metics and citizens is too far-fetched, it's just completely out of bounds right now. I also like to create interesting social challenges, and right now the Metics have taken the place of the (imo more hamfisted) class conflict of previous games.
@Cetashwayo what in particular will annoy Krotone about a war between Rhegion and Lokri? Haven't Krotone and Lokri drifted apart over time, and couldn't Krotone take a bite from Lokri while they're occupied?
Rhegion will considerably grow in power and become the new bigshot in the region, over and above even Thurii. It's a big shift and threatens their own remnant hopes of hegemony and pride.
I am honestly starting to wonder wheter some user-motion might be possible here. For example, could we refuse their actual demands but, say, give something like 20-30 talents to deal with the debt crisis as a way to make them swallow the pill more easily and therefore limit the numbers of those who will leave?
@Cetashwayo
I don't know where this idea that all the metics will leave is coming from. As fewer metics come to the city, the cost of the labor of the remaining metics will go up, thus preventing more from leaving because staying at home remains a better deal. Further, populations aren't that mobile, and these colonies are still getting established, and so you're seeing a few hundred metic men leave at a time, not thousands. There's also a far bigger group of people who are landing in Eretria, staying a fortnight, and then sailing off to the colonies once they become aware of the deal there.
Certainly there will be no mass exodus. Labor isn't that mobile.