A Hellfish flys again! ( a Simpsons X DVV CK2 Quest)

By the by, is it safe to assume Homer is going to be the millstone around our neck for this quest?
 
[x] Professor Frink
[x] Apu Nahasapeemapetilon

I really don't trust having Fat Tony anywhere near our operations and I'm sure we'll have options for keeping him or any other criminals in check.
 
Last edited:
Yeah Probably.
But, before teying to reach them, we should try to contact Mona (ex-wife, may still be alive) and Homer (our son, who may or may not have kept their job at the Nuclear Power Plant)

I mean, if we consider Season 18/19 as the break-off point for this quest, Mona should still be alive - but maybe not for long, since "canonically" she died in her sleep during Season 19


So yeah, that achievement might be on a pretty unforgiving deadline...maybe get to trying to patch up things with her ASAP?
 
Voting is closed
I know that crime is hard work
Doesn´t change the fact that I do not thrust Fat Tony any further that I could throw him.
Smelling another "Lovemuffin debacle" in the making, you know?
Unlike lovemuffin however Fat Tony is pretty competent alas the whole glass dome thing isn't something anyone would ever expect.
 
While true, FT being explicitly more competent is a bit of a double-edged sword.
Yes, but it kind of neutralizes the first argument you presented.

The problem with LOVEMUFFIN was that they were so incompetent that they couldn't do anything important, and they resented that they weren't being assigned to do anything important, and there was no feasible way to remedy their incompetence or at least secure them in a quietly loyal position where they wouldn't break anything important. That's a very specific type of problem.

You don't expect Fat Tony to present a LOVEMUFFIN problem. You expect Fat Tony to present a new, distinctive kind of problem. And it's probably a good idea to explain on its own merits why this is a problem, rather than just saying "it's like LOVEMUFFIN" when it clearly isn't the same thing.
 
Yes, but it kind of neutralizes the first argument you presented.

The problem with LOVEMUFFIN was that they were so incompetent that they couldn't do anything important, and they resented that they weren't being assigned to do anything important, and there was no feasible way to remedy their incompetence or at least secure them in a quietly loyal position where they wouldn't break anything important. That's a very specific type of problem.

You don't expect Fat Tony to present a LOVEMUFFIN problem. You expect Fat Tony to present a new, distinctive kind of problem. And it's probably a good idea to explain on its own merits why this is a problem, rather than just saying "it's like LOVEMUFFIN" when it clearly isn't the same thing.
A Better Example may be Janna if we never hunted for her friends.
 
A Better Example may be Janna if we never hunted for her friends.
I don't think people opposed to the Fat Tony pick are going to want to compare him to Janna.

Unless, of course, the argument is that the thread will inevitably not want to do the things that are part of Fat Tony's "upgrade path," while absolutely wanting to do the things in Janna's path.
 
Back
Top