Threads Of Destiny(Eastern Fantasy, Sequel to Forge of Destiny)

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)

Four Polar Theocracy rep is quite high - even a loss of 2 influence would be reasonably acceptable here. I would be still sympathetic to the Wang Lian option if it didn't promise long-term problems for the foreign quarter, but it does.
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
Looking like a landslide for 4.

[X] Support Wang Lian's proposal. It was the most strictly neutral option and perhaps a chance to claw back lost support. Even if it would upset the White Sky. It might make foreign quarter negotiations more difficult though. (+1 MoI Favorability, -1 WS and PT favorability. Complicates Foreign Quarter options)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)

Go for the big one.
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)

GREAT DEEDS BABY WOO! HELL YEAH!

SHOW US THE GODS, COME ALL YE SPIRITS, IT'S TIME! IT'S TIME FOR NAMES BABY!

COME ON DOWN AND ENJOY THESE PRECOCIOUS MORTALS! WE GOT SPUNK! WE GOT MOXY! WE GOT A BEAUTIFUL TURTLE CHILD! HELL YEAH BABY! WOO! YEAH! LOOK AT OUR LITTLE SISTER! SHE'S AMAZING ISN'T SHE?!

WE'LL SHOW YOU THE WONDERS AND HORRORS OF A WORLD ADMINISTRATED BY ASCENDING GODS! BE CONFOUNDED BY THE SURVIVAL OF A CULTURE THAT WILL NOT STOP BREEDING WITH VIOLENTLY DEADLY BEINGS BEYOND HUMAN COMPREHENSION! EXPERIENCE THE DAWNING HORROR OF REALIZING THAT WE'RE THE ONES THAT BLEW UP THE GOLDEN FIELDS! WOOO YEAHHHH! GREAT DEEDS BABY, YEAH!
 
[X] Support Inzha's proposal. It will require more administrative infrastructure, but it pairs well with your own thoughts. It is also limited enough that it should not hurt your position more. It holds more potential for conflicts down the row though. (+1 WS favorability, -1 PT Favorability. Does not hamper foreign Quarter goals. Theological border clashes more likely in the future.)

[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)

We also have a chance to establish Ling Qi as a major player and innovator, not just as an officiant. We need some legislation under our own name
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Support Wang Lian's proposal. It was the most strictly neutral option and perhaps a chance to claw back lost support. Even if it would upset the White Sky. It might make foreign quarter negotiations more difficult though. (+1 MoI Favorability, -1 WS and PT favorability. Complicates Foreign Quarter options)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
Adhoc vote count started by barty on Oct 7, 2023 at 4:05 AM, finished with 97 posts and 60 votes.
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)

[X] Let there be no limits on temples and ritual sites at all, the gods and great spirits should not be hampered by mortal affairs. (+1 PT Favorability, Theological Clashes likely to begin almost immediately post summit.)
 
Last edited:
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)
 
[X] Attempt your own proposal, let both parties discuss and petition their patrons for which spirits or gods would be most suitable to divine diplomacy, and let only these select few receive major dedications within shared spaces. (+1 ES and WS Favorability, -2 PT favorability. Ensures short term turbulence and theological debate, may allow greater stability. Supports foreign Quarter goals.)

If we succeed in this, we succeed, if not, we still succeed!
Gotta balance the scales! :V

Also, is it just me or will the greater PT will hear about this, in the gossip context of "A land full of man who will fight" ? :V
 
Last edited:
Back
Top