you know for a fact that its soul is simpler than most beasts and some insects.
Er, other way around- the Rider in Red is simpler than most beasts and some insects.The fascinating implication of this phrasing is that insects, by and large, have more complex souls than beasts- because most beasts (a larger fraction) but only some insects (a smaller fraction) are simpler, meaning that in turn a smaller fraction of beasts and a larger fraction of insects are the same or more complex.
I think you have it the wrong way around, it's saying they the Apparition's soul is simpler than most beasts and some insects, i.e. most beasts and some insects have a soul more complex than the Rider in Red's.[X] Knightbringer
[X] Dämmerlichtreiter
The fascinating implication of this phrasing is that insects, by and large, have more complex souls than beasts- because most beasts (a larger fraction) but only some insects (a smaller fraction) are simpler, meaning that in turn a smaller fraction of beasts and a larger fraction of insects are the same or more complex.
Yup. Wow, that's embarrassing. Sorry about that, folks. Apparently I had a blonde moment.
And some real stupid beasts-Box Turtles and Averlanders probablyStill, it does sound like there's some interesting insect souls out there.
If a Rider in Red is a manifestation of a Wizard's fear of being accosted on the battlefield, then surely it would be possible to tap into that origin to allow it to identify when that is about to happen, right?
It's on the sword-harder pile, so probably not as soon as I'd like.So when are we going to capture a Rotwyrm and use it in a Sword spell that can be used with Branarhune?
It's on the sword-harder pile, so probably not as soon as I'd like.
But, forging a legally-not-daemon into a blade of indestructible Orochimaru-style nightmare fuel would absolutely be super cool, so I think it'll stick in the thread's mind.
I think this got brought up before and the general consensus that at that point we wouldn't be using the Apparition itself, and that it'd be more practical to just research a sword spell the old-fashioned way, which is very viable for Mathilde because she has two sword-related traits already to base things on.So when are we going to capture a Rotwyrm and use it in a Sword spell that can be used with Branarhune?
Unless you're referring to several dozens of them, I think we can afford a bit more variety.I feel like there's probably a point at which you should stop trying to stick legally-not-daemons into your soul, to avoid having less soul than apparition-stuffed-in-soul.
Whispering Darkness is probably going to have dibs on that remaining space.
Well there was the option for the Rider spell to summon a band of 10 knights so at the very least Mathilde can bind 9 more apparitions to her soul.I feel like there's probably a point at which you should stop trying to stick legally-not-daemons into your soul, to avoid having less soul than apparition-stuffed-in-soul.
Whispering Darkness is probably going to have dibs on that remaining space.
@Boney From what we know how do apparition spell enchantments work? Does the wizard making it have to bind the apparition to their soul long enough to train it, and then move their end of the leash to an object, or does the apparition need to be immediately bound to an object after capture?
So that means the wizard has to decide if they want the apparition bound to their soul or an object immediately after capture, and an apparition that's already bound cannot be changed (ie putting a soul-bound apparition into an object to make room) without setting the apparition free, right?They go straight into the object, and the enchantment on the object alters the apparition's perceptions so that they act in the desired way when unleashed.
Being able to throw around cataclysm magic like regular battle magic would be such a flex. I want it.I remain sold on cataclysm tier whispering darkness murder fog spell.
So that means the wizard has to decide if they want the apparition bound to their soul or an object immediately after capture, and an apparition that's already bound cannot be changed (ie putting a soul-bound apparition into an object to make room) without setting the apparition free, right?