Chlof
Her Ladyship
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Those seem to be actual votes against purchases in those categories, they're just showing up as [] dwarf for some reasonSo is the dwarf no purchase also blocking the other purchase vote?
Those seem to be actual votes against purchases in those categories, they're just showing up as [] dwarf for some reasonSo is the dwarf no purchase also blocking the other purchase vote?
I covered this in my effortpost from before the purchase round:I'm concerned that the back-fill in particular is a waste of a turn'e acquisition. The Druuchi at least might come up in the next few turns, before we finish copying the books on them. Overall not as efficient, though.
I really don't think this is something we should worry about.Furthermore, one of the major libraries people have been talking about copying next turn is the University of Nuln's library: "The school specialises in mathematics, philosophy, theology, literature, and some sciences, disdaining the fringe sciences of newer programs. It's generally considered to have superior faculties of mathematics, science, philosophy, theology, and literature than Altdorf University." Notably, social sciences and history are not mentioned; as such, a Back-fill on Social Sciences is likely to not have significant overlap with a possible University copying action, and would be complementary rather than redundant (though obviously there would be some redundancy).
A known bug of the tally is that if there are multiple task votes with the same body, all of them will show up as the task of the first one to receive that vote (so, because it first registered No purchase as a vote in the dwarf category, they all show up as dwarf). It's a purely visual bug, the actual counts under the tasks are correct. This comes up every purchase round, but the last one was really short and the last one before that a long time ago, so it's reasonable to be confused.So is the dwarf no purchase also blocking the other purchase vote? Because it's showing up weird in the tally.
We have another 4 libraries to go though, and I'd expect it to show up in at least one of them. The many minor colleges, maybe.I covered this in my effortpost from before the purchase round:
I really don't think this is something we should worry about.
[X] [LIBRARY] Back-fill: Social sciences
I'd prefer to do this over the Druchii/Asur/Nehekara vote which wastes a good chunk of book value from redundancy.
The backfill, which has a pretty good chance of covering those things anyway.Wastes in comparison to what? Even in those books exist we do not know in which library or how long them might take to copy. Books today and books in three years are not the same thing after all since they impact when actions are taken and the success chance of said actions.
How would backfill cover druchii and Asur?. especially with it being social science focused...The backfill, which has a pretty good chance of covering those things anyway.
You do realize the Druchii and Asur books are, in fact, counted in the social sciences section, right? And that backfills specifically prioritize incomplete topics.How would backfill cover druchii and Asur?. especially with it being social science focused...
Oh snap, I certainly didn't.You do realize the Druchii and Asur books are, in fact, counted in the social sciences section, right?
To add to what everyone else has said, keep in mind that chaos is much nastier on individual basis. Chaos warriors are comparable to human hero units and are at an advantage against elven and dwarven elites. And they are basic troops in the army of the everchosen. Actual elites, like chosen are nastier still, and Chaos Lords are flat out scariest individuals in setting that are neither named character nor giant monsters. Speaking of, guess what an everchosen's army would bring a lot of? Yup, giant monsters.And the Empire far larger, and actually properly settled. How are Everchosen invasions ever a threat when the Empire's united?
The backfill, which has a pretty good chance of covering those things anyway.
And we can't really use that as a reference because Boney is changing how the system works. There was no "pick a specific section to focus on" thing back then. Besides, I remember us specifically getting out-of-pocket Bretonnian books on Druchii rather than choosing it as a Barak Varr topic because there were no Dwarven books, and to set things up for a future backfill.
And we can't really use that as a reference because Boney is changing how the system works. There was no "pick a specific section to focus on" thing back then.
And we can't really use that as a reference because Boney is changing how the system works. There was no "pick a specific section to focus on" thing back then. Besides, I remember us specifically getting out-of-pocket Bretonnian books on Druchii rather than choosing it as a Barak Varr topic because there were no Dwarven books, and to set things up for a future backfill.
What system? We do not know how those rolls worked/if there were rolls, much less if anything changed. We get to pick from a narrower selection yes but it is still 'whatever they can find at a good price'. I think it is reasonable to assume that will not include the full quantity of the three things we want, or else back-fill would always be best choice.
The above is the only example we have for back-fill which out of the twenty-one categories to which it added books did a +4 on precisely one of them. The Barak Var choice on the other hand will get +5 +6 and +10 respectively
Of course Boney changing the back-fill is relevant, what are you even talking about? A narrower amount of topics means more books for each topic, unless you think that Boney just made back-fill worse. Last turn got us +47 book bonus total over 21 topics, so each topic got not that many books. As pickle pointed out in this post it'll take +47 to fill out our social science section, which is exactly the amount our last back-fill gave!Eh, sort of? I doubt he's massively changing how it works—narratively speaking, last time we were just cleaning out our suppliers unsold stock, so it was truly random. This time, we're asking them to acquire any book they can within a certain cross section of topics, so I imagine that the numbers of books generated may be similar, even if Boney takes a different approach to generate those numbers.
Either way, it's still very luck dependent as to what we can get hold of, and I think it might be better to focus on a smaller number of guaranteed topics, especially with the copying actions happening next turn. Honestly, backfill might be a stronger action after we do the copying, because we'll have more categories to backfill.
Of course Boney changing the back-fill is relevant, what are you even talking about? A narrower amount of topics means more books for each topic, unless you think that Boney just made back-fill worse. Last turn got us +47 book bonus total over 21 topics, so each topic got not that many books. As pickle pointed out in this post it'll take +47 to fill out our social science section, which is exactly the amount our last back-fill gave!
You are assuming that the thing which is going to scale is the bonus each individual topic got last time, rather than the total number of books. Why would that be a resonable assumption? No section in our library has 23 incomplete topics, which is as much as our last back-fill covered; do you think Boney just made back-fill unambiguously much worse in all circumstances?We do not know if it scales perfectly, even if it does that single +4 would proportional become +5.3, we have no guarantee that it will fall on something we care about and more to the point we do not know how lucky we got last time in and endeavor that probably was at least partly luck based.
You are assuming that the thing which is going to scale is the bonus each individual topic got last time, rather than the total number of books. Why would that be a resonable assumption? No section in our library has 23 incomplete topics, which is as much as our last back-fill covered; do you think Boney just made back-fill unambiguously much worse in all circumstances?
Obviously the Barak-Varr purchase will get us all books on these specific topics (and on Nehekhara which as you correctly point out is not an incomplete topic) and a back-fill might only get some, but the logic you're using to imply that it will probably only get us a +3 or so is extremely questionable.