Now, I know Ternasta isn't going to be replying to this immediately, but it's a reasonable accusation and I want to respond to it.Why not admit you are basing this decision entirely on OOC knowledge, @Simon_Jester? It's silly to pretend otherwise.
Your worries about unknown risks associated with banishing strike me as a bit overblown because most of them rely on the idea that one of our enemies would succeed in tracking down Kintoleski, subduing him, and using him as a weapon, and importantly that this would be more effective than just using whatever they had on hand against us more directly.I think there are strong arguments for both positions, but what it really comes down to is that I'm willing to accept a higher known risk than the uncertainty that comes with Banishing.
That's really the issue. Banishing has a lot more uncertainty about it, it means the the enemy could do something that we haven't thought of, and that worries me.
Those supporting Banish are basically assuming that the worst case can't be worse than Purifying him right now. (Some have even explicitly said this). I'm not nearly as certain of this as the other voters are, so I feel that Purify is the safer choice. It has risk but the risk is known, no unc-uncs to worry about.
I feel genuine sympathy that I would normally express as a hug-vote, but wasn't sure it would be right to hug-vote this, so I'm saying this instead.1. Funny ratings on serious posts are, discouraged, to say the least.
2. Claiming people are lying is generally poor form in a debate without actual evidence.
edit-
I am not sure if this was intended.
But hug ratings in a post calling out rating abuse kinda feels condescending, especially from the person being called out.
So please cut it out.
I'm going to slightly disagree with this.And, of course... while Kintoleski is strong, he's not THAT strong. Not so strong that we can't defeat him if we have to. He's a buff boy, not a superweapon.
What I mean is that he's not a superweapon when used against us. Our own continued existence is a working assumption we kind of have to make in our own future plans.I'm going to slightly disagree with this.
Kintoleski kinda is a super weapon, but then so are the Pretty Cures, and Senshi are even more so.
Well, super soldiers, more accurately, but close enough.
He is still someone the Senshi can expect to defeat with pretty reasonable confidence though, and that confidence approaches certainty as we keep growing.
Which is why i disagree slightly, instead of completely.What I mean is that he's not a superweapon when used against us. Our own continued existence is a working assumption we kind of have to make in our own future plans.
Again, what I'm getting at here is that the argument "Kintoleski is too powerful to be left alive and free as a loose cannon" is fundamentally rather flawed. You could make a similar argument about the strongest yokai, for instance, and I imagine the IMO does, and that it's a big part of the fundamental public-facing justification they give for enslaving and oppressing yokai. We have no trouble seeing the hole in the argument when it's the IMO making it, either.
[X][Runoff] Purify him
And because it's suddenly relevant again, here's an observation. I'm pretty sure we're still being recorded by the news crews. They've caught most of the fight, and if they are here, people are absolutely going to see what we do with/to Kintoleski.
Also, the police (and by extension the government) may be annoyed by us letting a member of a terrorist organization go free.The risk cuts both ways. We let someone go, and then later they show up again and get people injured or killed and people will be upset.
I know it's not an option in the vote, but in-character the most sensible thing to do would be to hand him over to MCAT or the police (it would also allow a chance for the Pretty Cures to meet Samui and the superintendent).sounds like he's going to go off on his own, and we aren't going to supervise him or anything, not that we really have the resources to do so either.
I'd argue that it's more like that Gumiho who's allegedly a mass murderer and was used to murder other yokai. Sure, at least some of what she did was under duress, but you still wouldn't want to just let her go around unsupervised, since she's a possible mass murderer, definitely has a body count, and other yokai are terrified of her.You could make a similar argument about the strongest yokai, for instance, and I imagine the IMO does, and that it's a big part of the fundamental public-facing justification they give for enslaving and oppressing yokai.
The police are still figuring out how to restrain supervillains, so a candid answer would be something like "I'm pretty sure that would just have ended with a comical Kintoleski-shaped hole in the side of your jail cell."Also, the police (and by extension the government) may be annoyed by us letting a member of a terrorist organization go free.
I mean, from the point of view of the police, they're going to want to know why we didn't just arrest him and turn him over to them.
Significant differences:I'd argue that it's more like that Gumiho who's allegedly a mass murderer and was used to murder other yokai. Sure, at least some of what she did was under duress, but you still wouldn't want to just let her go around unsupervised, since she's a possible mass murderer, definitely has a body count, and other yokai are terrified of her.
Yes, handing Kinto to the police is not an option being voted on, and i find it very unlikely it will happen if we purify him without killing him in the process.Also, the police (and by extension the government) may be annoyed by us letting a member of a terrorist organization go free.
I mean, from the point of view of the police, they're going to want to know why we didn't just arrest him and turn him over to them.
I know it's not an option in the vote, but in-character the most sensible thing to do would be to hand him over to MCAT or the police (it would also allow a chance for the Pretty Cures to meet Samui and the superintendent).
I'd argue that it's more like that Gumiho who's allegedly a mass murderer and was used to murder other yokai. Sure, at least some of what she did was under duress, but you still wouldn't want to just let her go around unsupervised, since she's a possible mass murderer, definitely has a body count, and other yokai are terrified of her.
I think that we could make a reasonable argument that we prioritize de-escalation and reducing civilian casualties over arresting or elimination.Also, the police (and by extension the government) may be annoyed by us letting a member of a terrorist organization go free.
I mean, from the point of view of the police, they're going to want to know why we didn't just arrest him and turn him over to them.
If Kinto isn't willing to voluntarily accept being supervised by MCAT, then I wouldn't trust him with an unsupervised banishment.We also don't know if MCAt or the police can hold Kinto against his will.
And if he can be trusted to stay in place purely out of honor, there's no need for police custody.If Kinto isn't willing to voluntarily accept being supervised by MCAT, then I wouldn't trust him with an unsupervised banishment.
Either he's trustworthy - in which case he can accept some kind of supervision to monitor his behavior - or he isn't.
Sure.Parole is derived from the French word, parol, and means word of honor. The word recalls prisoners of war who promised not to fight in a current conflict if the captor released them. It's unclear how the original idea now applies to an early release of offenders.
While that is interesting, I was talking about how Teiresias says he should be supervised and you say he shouldn't go to jail.
I'm not saying he should not go to jail (well, i am, kinda, technically, but that was not my point).While that is interesting, I was talking about how Teiresias says he should be supervised and you say he shouldn't go to jail.
Still, all we can really do at this point is wait and see if the TMPD shows up before he leaves.
It's pretty common in parole for the person to be required to have a supervising officer. And I'm pretty sure the Japanese government won't be happy about an ex-soldier of a terrorist organisation running around Japan unsupervised. It doesn't matter how honourable Kinto may act, or how trustworthy we may think he is - they won't like it (and they won't consider it a decision that we're empowered to make anyway), and they'll want an eye kept on him to make sure he really is sticking to the terms.I'm not saying he should not go to jail (well, i am, kinda, technically, but that was not my point).
What i am saying is that we may be in a situation where jail is either useless, or unnecessary.
Either we can trust him, in which case we don't need jail, or we can't, in which case he just walks out of jail (assuming MCAT does not have the means to contain him, which they might, but i would not bet on that).
That's why I suggested outsourcing to MCAT or the police.And unless we start using somekind of tracking or loyalty magic, parole is just banish with extra work for us.