Hmm, amazing how Usagi trusting an enemy after one just proved utterly untrustworthy is somehow supposed to be in character. Why not admit you are basing this decision entirely on OOC knowledge, @Simon_Jester? It's silly to pretend otherwise.
...Hmm, amazing how Usagi trusting an enemy after one just proved utterly untrustworthy is somehow supposed to be in character. Why not admit you are basing this decision entirely on OOC knowledge, @Simon_Jester? It's silly to pretend otherwise.
That is such a false equivalency. Even just based on their observed behavior in the quest, comparing Poisony to Kintoleski is laughable. One was a backstabbing, sadistic bitch who tried to get a bunch of people killed, while the other just had open, peaceful talks with everyone present (including the Youma who attacked him), and didn't initiate violence against anyone when he wasn't being possessed by the former's minions.Hmm, amazing how Usagi trusting an enemy after one just proved utterly untrustworthy is somehow supposed to be in character. Why not admit you are basing this decision entirely on OOC knowledge, @Simon_Jester? It's silly to pretend otherwise.
I don't particularly get annoyed at votes, but I'd prefer people to be honest about their reasons. Basically, people think he's cool and want to grab him risk free as a prize. That's the only reason people are advocating for Banish, let's be precise.
I don't think that's true. I think several people are worried about killing him because they don't think he deserves death. My response though is that Banish does not guarantee he will survive, because it means the enemy has plenty of time to try something to change the situation. It's an unknown risk.I don't particularly get annoyed at votes, but I'd prefer people to be honest about their reasons. Basically, people think he's cool and want to grab him risk free as a prize. That's the only reason people are advocating for Banish, let's be precise.
And how about we don't pretend to be mind readers.I don't particularly get annoyed at votes, but I'd prefer people to be honest about their reasons. Basically, people think he's cool and want to grab him risk free as a prize. That's the only reason people are advocating for Banish, let's be precise.
And now you accuse people of lying because they disagree with you. That's a fantastic way to foster healthy discussion.I don't particularly get annoyed at votes, but I'd prefer people to be honest about their reasons.
If I am understanding you correctly, the main appeal to you of the Purify vote is that, one way or another, the matter is settled. Kintoleski may survive, or he may not, but either way the Fountain is claimed and Kintoleski is no longer a "free radical" that can come back to bite us before we are ready to try extracting the Fountain again. Even if Kintoleski is no longer bound to his lord and has no intention of doing any further harm, Dark Fall or any of the other 5 evil alien organizations may end up trying to brainwash him or harvest the Fountain for themselves or who knows what, which may leave us in a position where we have to fight him again when he ISN'T brainwashed and we don't get ANY of the things we wanted.I don't think that's true. I think several people are worried about killing him because they don't think he deserves death. My response though is that Banish does not guarantee he will survive, because it means the enemy has plenty of time to try something to change the situation. It's an unknown risk.
And what is happening here is that some of us discount unknowns, and feel that we just shouldn't consider them because they are unknowns. That's why people keep claiming that Banish is a sure thing when it is not. While others like me, instinctively want to avoid unknown risk, to the point of favoring a known risk over the unknown one.
But it does guarantee we do not kill a surrendered enemy on TV.I don't think that's true. I think several people are worried about killing him because they don't think he deserves death. My response though is that Banish does not guarantee he will survive, because it means the enemy has plenty of time to try something to change the situation. It's an unknown risk.
And what is happening here is that some of us discount unknowns, and feel that we just shouldn't consider them because they are unknowns. That's why people keep claiming that Banish is a sure thing when it is not. While others like me, instinctively want to avoid unknown risk, to the point of favoring a known risk over the unknown one.
Hmm, I got accused of advocating murder because I disagreed with you. But I suppose there's no point in continuing this conversation, hopefully people will choose the right choice rather than what you advocate so dishonestly and hypocritically.And now you accuse people of lying because they disagree with you. That's a fantastic way to foster healthy discussion.
1. Funny ratings on serious posts are, discouraged, to say the least.Hmm, I got accused of advocating murder because I disagreed with you. But I suppose there's no point in continuing this conversation, hopefully people will choose the right choice rather than what you advocate so dishonestly.
If I am understanding you correctly, the main appeal to you of the Purify vote is that, one way or another, the matter is settled. Kintoleski may survive, or he may not, but either way the Fountain is claimed and Kintoleski is no longer a "free radical" that can come back to bite us before we are ready to try extracting the Fountain again. Even if Kintoleski is no longer bound to his lord and has no intention of doing any further harm, Dark Fall or any of the other 5 evil alien organizations may end up trying to brainwash him or harvest the Fountain for themselves or who knows what, which may leave us in a position where we have to fight him again when he ISN'T brainwashed and we don't get ANY of the things we wanted.
I think there are strong arguments for both positions, but what it really comes down to is that I'm willing to accept a higher known risk than the uncertainty that comes with Banishing.
That's really the issue. Banishing has a lot more uncertainty about it, it means the the enemy could do something that we haven't thought of, and that worries me.
Those supporting Banish are basically assuming that the worst case can't be worse than Purifying him right now. (Some have even explicitly said this). I'm not nearly as certain of this as the other voters are, so I feel that Purify is the safer choice. It has risk but the risk is known, no unc-uncs to worry about.
I'm sorry if the manner in which I personally disagreed with you hurt your feelings, and it's equally unfortunate if other people have made you feel similarly. But in that case, it's your responsibility to respond to that insult in a mature way, instead of lobbing petty insults like you have been—calling people idiotic, accusing someone of being duplicitous by comparing them to politicians and lawyers, accusing half the discussion of lying about why they support the option they do. Because that's what those are, petty insults.Hmm, I got accused of advocating murder because I disagreed with you.
And so is that.hopefully people will choose the right choice rather than what you advocate so dishonestly and hypocritically.
Just want to be clear, I voted for Purify, but that post wasn't primarily about convincing people to vote that way. I just took exception to Modus_Tollens saying the concern that Kintoleski might come back to fight us later, willingly or not, was 'Out of character knowledge.' It's one of many valid concerns for the characters in the scene to be considering and suggesting otherwise is an annoying and dishonest debate tactic.Again, we could say the same of powerful yokai.
If Kintoleski isn't bound specifically to obey his overlord, we have no reason to expect him to cause any more trouble than an equally powerful yokai. And we wouldn't be questioning an equally powerful yokai's right to exist.
We don't really have an assurance that Jadeite won't come back and make trouble later either; I don't recall many votes for summarily executing him.
Oh, no need to worry. My feelings aren't hurt at all. You've given me a lot of amusement over the past couple days, so I thank you for your help in boosting my mood once more.I'm sorry if the manner in which I personally disagreed with you hurt your feelings, and it's equally unfortunate if other people have made you feel similarly. But in that case, it's your responsibility to respond to that insult in a mature way, instead of lobbing petty insults like you have been—calling people idiotic, accusing someone of being duplicitous by comparing them to politicians and lawyers, accusing half the discussion of lying about why they support the option they do. Because that's what those are, petty insults.
...You really enjoy being condescending, don't you?Oh, no need to worry. My feelings aren't hurt at all. You've given me a lot of amusement over the past couple days, so I thank you for your help in boosting my mood once more.Please feel free to continue to feel the wounded party, I hope that gives you as much entertainment as I gain from reading your absurd accusations.
I don't particularly get annoyed at votes, but I'd prefer people to be honest about their reasons. Basically, people think he's cool and want to grab him risk free as a prize. That's the only reason people are advocating for Banish, let's be precise.