Voting is open
No OPEN Russian soldiers. Deniable Russian soldiers are fair game. Look at the east of Ukraine, and all the little green men on leave from the Russian army wielding totally not-Russian gear and not-Russian tanks under not-Russian orders to aid the rebels. They even gave them fucking SAMs, like the Buk that shot down Malaysian Airlines Flight 370.
I mean. I am ukrainian.
I know.

Thing is, due to loads of local separatists having gone through conscription which used similar hardware, need to retrain is often minimal.
In theory, applies even to Buk, although in practice local morons fucked it up cause lol separatists.


Notably, there are no, like, Russian armored divisions rolling in, you know? The russian forces do exist, sure, but they are uhh....not playing deciding role. Recall said Buk being operated by incompetent locals. If they could send their operators along with such fairly pricey thing? They would.

And this is fucking direct Russian border, not East Coast of USA.
 
Last edited:
shouldn't this be threadmarked to make sure everyone reads it? It seems quite a lot of important information.

It gives a lot more context on which to base the siege/no siege decision.
Hm, fair point.
See, I was thinking about this -

and then I remembered the Victorians got absolutely dominated in the Pacific War in pretty much every single way right up until the Pacific Republic collapsed. Moreover, there'd be basically no way of hiding it from the players; they would at least know that they've been being bodied left and right when even Lindtopia reports that "yes in fact our aircraft are fucking swept from the sky lol and the artillery's been pounding us nonstop and we're losing like ten men for every one of theirs".

So. This may actually be not an unfamiliar feeling for them, and moreover, there might be precedent for the QM to show them screwed over like this.

Perhaps with a warning of "You just tried to solo the last great bastion of American might across the fucking continent without nuclear weapons or a plan to neutralize their armed forces other than YOLO. You fucking lucky dipshits, you're so goddamn lucky the Tsar hasn't rolled beneath a ninety this whole campaign."
Nah, lean into it. Remember, the actual forces the Vicks were using were mercenary forces. The actual Victorian troops — CMC, one and all — were raping and pillaging the unthreatened occupation zones like murdering cowards undertaking the noble work of deprogramming the depraved Azanian regime's victims and punishing the true believers.

And those mercenaries could obviously never be relied upon to execute the true glory and vision of Rumford's doctrine!
 
Another problem is what happens if Russia decides to deploy special forces and other specialist assets. As an under the table option comitting them isn't a declaration of war but having professional soldiers rattling around behind our lines could be a serious issue. Likewise any intelligence agents we caught would be declared 'civilians acting on delusions of grandeur'. How should we treat Russian 'civilians' caught in acts of espionage, arson and terrorism?
 
What I think the infopost tells us is that at worst the Russians might try to send supplies, but won't actually send forces against us. So a siege is still a good strategy, if we blocade any supplies. We can deny airdrops with our anti-air, and block anything from sea if we keep our ships there instead of on bombardment. Russians flying Russia-marked planes directly into the besieged area is a no-go because it'd run into far too many diplomatic tripwires, and anything less than that we can fully prevent. So, with all that, I think I'm going to fully switch my vote for Maneuver + Blockade.

[X] Plan: Maneuver Out of This! (BUT WITH BLOCKADE)
-[X] Defend with all committable forces. Bring up all of your troops and all of the Detroit Militia. You don't just want to win this one; you want to utterly smash this assault and enjoy numerical superiority for a change. Afterwards, you can wipe them out easily. With this force, you won't even hypothetically need the Big Red One. Estimated two days to total force destruction. The BRO will not in any case be needed.
-[X] Siege. Victorians do not get glorious last stands against you. They get run down like foxes before your tanks. They get picked apart from extreme range, useless prayers on their lips. This force will die the slow death of starvation and dwindling supplies. Only once they have lost any ability to present a threat to your forces will you close the noose on them. Does not use a charge of OWE. Possibility of light casualties. Possibility that the Victorians' nerve breaks and they resume their offensive. One week to prepare and begin offensive operations. Resolution will likely take a long time, possibly multiple months.
-[X] Capture them. Hey, if Victoria doesn't want the tonnage, you can see some use in them.
-[X] Blockade. All of this could be undone if Victoria manages to slip transport ships to its cut-off forces. Ensure that that cannot happen.
 
What I think the infopost tells us is that at worst the Russians might try to send supplies, but won't actually send forces against us. So a siege is still a good strategy, if we blocade any supplies. We can deny airdrops with our anti-air, and block anything from sea if we keep our ships there instead of on bombardment. Russians flying Russia-marked planes directly into the besieged area is a no-go because it'd run into far too many diplomatic tripwires, and anything less than that we can fully prevent. So, with all that, I think I'm going to fully switch my vote for Maneuver + Blockade.

[X] Plan: Maneuver Out of This! (BUT WITH BLOCKADE)
-[X] Defend with all committable forces. Bring up all of your troops and all of the Detroit Militia. You don't just want to win this one; you want to utterly smash this assault and enjoy numerical superiority for a change. Afterwards, you can wipe them out easily. With this force, you won't even hypothetically need the Big Red One. Estimated two days to total force destruction. The BRO will not in any case be needed.
-[X] Siege. Victorians do not get glorious last stands against you. They get run down like foxes before your tanks. They get picked apart from extreme range, useless prayers on their lips. This force will die the slow death of starvation and dwindling supplies. Only once they have lost any ability to present a threat to your forces will you close the noose on them. Does not use a charge of OWE. Possibility of light casualties. Possibility that the Victorians' nerve breaks and they resume their offensive. One week to prepare and begin offensive operations. Resolution will likely take a long time, possibly multiple months.
-[X] Capture them. Hey, if Victoria doesn't want the tonnage, you can see some use in them.
-[X] Blockade. All of this could be undone if Victoria manages to slip transport ships to its cut-off forces. Ensure that that cannot happen.
At this point i agree. A siege makes sense only if we actually do our best to stop any supplies from reaching the Victorian troops.

Otherwise it's simply not worth it, and we should proceed with a limited assault, or even a full assault with owe.

[X] Plan: Maneuver Out of This! (BUT WITH BLOCKADE)
-[X] Defend with all committable forces. Bring up all of your troops and all of the Detroit Militia. You don't just want to win this one; you want to utterly smashthis assault and enjoy numerical superiority for a change. Afterwards, you can wipe them out easily. With this force, you won't even hypothetically need the Big Red One. Estimated two days to total force destruction. The BRO will not in any case be needed.
-[X] Siege. Victorians do not get glorious last stands against you. They get run down like foxes before your tanks. They get picked apart from extreme range, useless prayers on their lips. This force will die the slow death of starvation and dwindling supplies. Only once they have lost any ability to present a threat to your forces will you close the noose on them. Does not use a charge of OWE. Possibility of light casualties. Possibility that the Victorians' nerve breaks and they resume their offensive. One week to prepare and begin offensive operations. Resolution will likely take a long time, possibly multiple months.
-[X] Capture them. Hey, if Victoria doesn't want the tonnage, you can see some use in them.
-[X] Blockade. All of this could be undone if Victoria manages to slip transport ships to its cut-off forces. Ensure that that cannot happen.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, limited is....better for politics. We can show other neighbours that "here vicks are dead" as fiat accompli, which is useful.
 
And those mercenaries could obviously never be relied upon to execute the true glory and vision of Rumford's doctrine
Speaking of which, what was the quality and/or origin of these mercenary forces? Were they official PMCs, former military personnel, or otherwise taught-by-Collapse-experience Americans who had a solid grasp of fighting?

Or were they pretty much anyone who had a gun and (mostly) knew how to use it, and had a desperate enough need for money with the Collapse that even fighting for Victoria was better than the alternative of starving?
 
I mean. I am ukrainian.I know.

Thing is, due to loads of local separatists having gone through conscription which used similar hardware, need to retrain is often minimal.In theory, applies even to Buk, although in practice local morons fucked it up cause lol separatists.


Notably, there are no, like, Russian armored divisions rolling in, you know? The russian forces do exist, sure, but they are uhh....not playing deciding role. Recall said Buk being operated by incompetent locals. If they could send their operators along with such fairly pricey thing? They would.

And this is fucking direct Russian border, not East Coast of USA.
-My sympathies

-You had actual Russian tanks on the ground in 2014, according to the NYT. And there were captured Russian paratroopers with IFVs and Russian attack helicopters crossing the border
www.thedailybeast.com

Russian Tanks Roll Into Ukraine

Ukrainian troops in full retreat.

-This is a much bigger Russia in a world where it's only enemies are still recovering from the Collapse.
Much freer hand, and more resources to do as it likes
What I think the infopost tells us is that at worst the Russians might try to send supplies, but won't actually send forces against us. So a siege is still a good strategy, if we blocade any supplies. We can deny airdrops with our anti-air, and block anything from sea if we keep our ships there instead of on bombardment. Russians flying Russia-marked planes directly into the besieged area is a no-go because it'd run into far too many diplomatic tripwires, and anything less than that we can fully prevent. So, with all that, I think I'm going to fully switch my vote for Maneuver + Blockade.
Like I just pointed out, a fighter escort with HARMs would considerably degrade any interception ability.

Or even better, how do you stop them landing at Toledo Airport and moving any supplies by land?
Or just converting a section of the highway twenty kilometers away from the lake into a rough landing strip? The Candid was explicitly designed to use rough landing strips, and I doubt whatever the RuAF is using now would abandon the capability.

Not to mention all the possible joys of not-Russian special forces.
And the Russians passing the Victorians near realtime satellite and drone reconaissance of the disposition of our forces.
 
Another problem is what happens if Russia decides to deploy special forces and other specialist assets. As an under the table option comitting them isn't a declaration of war but having professional soldiers rattling around behind our lines could be a serious issue. Likewise any intelligence agents we caught would be declared 'civilians acting on delusions of grandeur'. How should we treat Russian 'civilians' caught in acts of espionage, arson and terrorism?
Trial to ascertain that their actions were in fact acts of espionage or war. Then if we determine such, execution.

This isnt a guerilla force resisting occupation here. These are foreign citizens coming to our country to do things that if they were in uniform and claimed by Russia, would be acts of war.

If Russia does claim them as agents then we treat them as prisoners of foreign powers and use them as bargaining chips whenever they have our guys we want back alive. When this is all over and we have reunited the country, we release them on time served never to return.

Then we rip russia a new one.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of which, what was the quality and/or origin of these mercenary forces? Were they official PMCs, former military personnel, or otherwise taught-by-Collapse-experience Americans who had a solid grasp of fighting?

Or were they pretty much anyone who had a gun and (mostly) knew how to use it, and had a desperate enough need for money with the Collapse that even fighting for Victoria was better than the alternative of starving?
Hugely variable. Some were professional groups brought in by Russia, some were randos living in the area who scraped together what weapons they could for a paycheck.
 
Trial to ascertain that their actions were in fact acts of espionage or war. Then if we determine such, execution.
This isnt a guerilla force resisting occupation here. These are foreign citizens coming to our country to do things that if they were in uniform and claimed by Russia, would be acts of war.
Russian trained and origin. Victorian-flagged, with dual citizenship.
Victoria claims them as special forces teams. Perfectly legal.
We treat them like any other POW as long as they have committed no warcrimes.
 
I do not think Tsar will pull actual cold war planes into hands of vicks all of a sudden, not on a short notice. They lack doctrine and skills to operate them anyway. And using his own forces - well, poptart has addressed that already. No Russian soldiers and thus not a single vicky who knows how to use cold war equipment, not in this war.
Thus not a single piece of cold war era equipment in hands of vickies, cause they lack skills to utilize it.
Again, go back to thinking about the Korean War.

There were, it is pretty well established by now, Russian pilots. In jets painted to look North Korean. Fighting the US Air Force, in what was theoretically a UN operation to push the North Koreans out of South Korea.

It would be entirely precedented for Russian totally not Russian Russian-speaking Victorians with citizenship papers dated to the middle of last week to show up piloting fighters considerably more dangerous than anything we've dealt with, IF our air defense missiles start doing a good job shooting down Russian totally not Russian Victorian transport planes carrying ammo humanitarian relief supplies for the Victorian army the people of Toledo.

And that's assuming our SAMs even have the range to hit the Russian totally not Russian Victorian transport planes, when our army is on the north bank of the Raisin and the transport planes are likely flying into Toledo.

It sounds like we need to actively court foreign sponsors.
Oh hell yes do we ever.

But that's a project for the coming years.

I mean. I am ukrainian.
I know.

Thing is, due to loads of local separatists having gone through conscription which used similar hardware, need to retrain is often minimal.
In theory, applies even to Buk, although in practice local morons fucked it up cause lol separatists.


Notably, there are no, like, Russian armored divisions rolling in, you know? The russian forces do exist, sure, but they are uhh....not playing deciding role. Recall said Buk being operated by incompetent locals. If they could send their operators along with such fairly pricey thing? They would.

And this is fucking direct Russian border, not East Coast of USA.
Put this way.

Imagine if Putin were coming off of a fifty-year high of having reduced all rivals to his power, shattered all other great powers until only desperate coalitions of lesser nations dared to stand against him. Imagine Putin with literally the world at his feet.

Now imagine the shit that Putin would be doing, in a Ukraine-like situation, with having Russian totally not Russian local Donbass separatist locals who just happen to have moved there from Russia last week and resigned from the Russian armed forces the week before that to be come patriotic Donbass separatist locals do you sense the sarcasm here, because I hope you do.

Alexander is very much like Putin, if Putin didn't think anyone could possibly stop him and wasn't even worried about the possibility and hadn't needed to worry about it for thirty or forty years after succeeding in almost every undertaking he'd ever attempted throughout his life.

He's gonna try shit.

What I think the infopost tells us is that at worst the Russians might try to send supplies, but won't actually send forces against us. So a siege is still a good strategy, if we blocade any supplies. We can deny airdrops with our anti-air, and block anything from sea if we keep our ships there instead of on bombardment. Russians flying Russia-marked planes directly into the besieged area is a no-go because it'd run into far too many diplomatic tripwires, and anything less than that we can fully prevent. So, with all that, I think I'm going to fully switch my vote for Maneuver + Blockade.
I'm not as optimistic about our ability to stop supplies from being flown in as you are.

Remember that when the Victorians launched their big air attack on us when we were holding the Raisin Line, we had to wait and sucker them in. This suggests that we couldn't simply pot their planes with missiles while we were on the Raisin Line and they were flying low over Toledo. Presumably we didn't have the range to do that. If we didn't have it then, then we won't have it a week or three from now when we're occupying the same positions.

And sure, supplies dropped off at Toledo Airport will have a difficult, unpleasant journey to get to frontline troops on the south bank of the Raisin, but it's not impossibly far, just difficult. We can throttle back the rate at which those supplies reach the front, but we can't stop it.

Or just converting a section of the highway twenty kilometers away from the lake into a rough landing strip? The Candid was explicitly designed to use rough landing strips, and I doubt whatever the RuAF is using now would abandon the capability.
I will note that sizeable chunks of the interstate highway system were originally designed with that in mind, because the Strategic Air Command wanted the option of using them as emergency runways. With no maintenance for a long time it might take some preparation, but the Victorians could (and probably have before) turn(ed) stretches of highway into such airstrips.

Especially since we now know the Russians DO pull this trick of supplying Victorian expeditionary forces that run into trouble in the field. This isn't unprecedented. It may not even be the first time someone beat a Victorian field army, it's just that we're beating them harder, and the Russians can't interfere quite as blatantly to bail Victoria's ass out of the fire. So previously, people might win a battle against Victoria (probably against a smaller force too) but they'd still lose the war due to Russian supplies and airstrikes- and now the Victorians would be pissed.
 
To add onto the concerns with a seige, there exists the possibility that since we are gridlocked with the Vics, the states that are around us may decide to maintain the embargo. As remember, they kind of do not like us, and loosing 4 AP in order to maybe save some troops is.... a much harsher proposition. Plus, small actions would let us build up more of an NCO core that we can later turn into instructors and commanders to improve our military later on/start a small academy.
 
Remember that when the Victorians launched their big air attack on us when we were holding the Raisin Line, we had to wait and sucker them in. This suggests that we couldn't simply pot their planes with missiles while we were on the Raisin Line and they were flying low over Toledo. Presumably we didn't have the range to do that. If we didn't have it then, then we won't have it a week or three from now when we're occupying the same positions.
You did not have to sucker them in, it's just that Franks was feeling vengeful and bloodthirsty and wanted them at point-blank range before they realized that they really needed to run. And she managed to convince Burns that doing so was worthwhile.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top