Honestly that's an incredible idea.

There could be a whole sequel to the Odyssey premised around their adventures together in the West, as brothers. Also maybe more prominent roles for Penelope and Circe, which would both emphasize Eretria's focus on marriage, and also mythical MILFs apparently.

The ideal Eretrian woman is stately in her disposition, a mother of fine sons, a steward of the household, and can be known by her frequent blushing and distinctive expression "Ara, ara."
 
I like how there is this very impassioned moral and legal argument here going on about whether our strategos dishonored his position, what is justified in war time, etc., whilst me and @Droman are instead planning The Real Housewives of Aeaea.

In fairness, the Greeks were way too into divine incest, which unfortunately makes any pantheon plays slightly difficult to plot.

At least the Romans had the good mind to not write any stories about their gods, leaving them free of such creepy entanglements as the Greeks promoted.
 
Last edited:
@Cetashwayo Not sure if it was answered yet, but how much of the 50 talents are we giving the Enetoi? Or are the 50 already the remaining money after giving them their part?

After giving them their part.

It will be easier to convince them to give us a place for a trading outpost that can grow over time and put the Kymaians(?) on the southern liburnian island which we won in war and can protect (or press into submission) more easily. Also, that will quick start our presence there and deny the liburnians the chance of infiltrate back. @Cetashwayo , are the islands even capable to house that many people?

I mean, they might be, but it's a bit of a waste to double down on this small group of islands when there are much better locations in the region. One of the advantages of the Venetian lagoon is that the estuarine islands are very fertile and can sustain the population of a new colony for a long time before the mainland is necessary.
 
Last edited:
The ideal Eretrian woman is stately in her disposition, a mother of fine sons, a steward of the household, and can be known by her frequent blushing and distinctive expression "Ara, ara."


o7

@Cetashwayo can we choose to name one of the Adriatic colonies Kymai Eskhata or Kymai the Furthest?
I had thought about it but I'm not a huge fan of how the name sounds. Doesn't have enough syllables in "Kymai" to roll off the tongue as nicely as Eretria Eskhata.
just call it new city "neapolis", done

This is doubly amusing because it will annoy the fuck out of the already-extant Neapolis just south of Kymai, which serves them right for making a deal with the Oscans.
 
I want to be even more clear. Exiling Ireanos would risk fucking shattering the Eretria social contract into pieces

@Erandil you argue we follow the example of Herodion and the Exoria. And I want to be perfectly clear on this. Herodion qnd the founding exorians started the tradition by voluntarily going away. While the rest were exiled for threatening our Democracy by bringing weapons into the assembly. Which looking back with the Kerkyra piece was a dangerous situation that could have endes in purges.

And what Ireanos did wasn't nearly so grave. So exiling him would cheapen the bonds of citizenship.

And of course. There is also the fact that it shits on the spirit of the tradition of Herodion. Has Cetash pointed out. One of the reasons our democracy is so stable is because our politicians can lose horribly. Get outplayed and utterly humiliated by their opponents and still be allowed to walk away and withdraw themselves to better themselves and wait for an opportunity. We don't punish them, we don't exile them, we just let them be.

As a result our politicians are willing to step back and suffer humiliating defeats rather than fight to the bitter end. Including with force.

But if we exile Ireanos who lost in politics and has already done what is expected, ie: resigned. We are fucking that system. Because now suddenly humiliating political defeats are existential threats now. The Antipatrids and Exorians won't stand for it. And I bet you that they definitely inherited Antipater and Herodion's fears of a Drako based oligarchy.

Not to mention risk turning Ireanos into potentially our Alcibiades since Syracuse is right there
 
Last edited:
In fairness, the Greeks were way too into divine incest, which unfortunately makes any pantheon plays slightly difficult to plot.

At least the Romans had the good mind to not write any stories about their gods, leaving them free of such creepy entanglements as the Greeks promoted.

INB4 Eretria ends up furthering Greek mathematics to include topology and the extension of Euclidean geometry into n-dimensional spaces, just so that we can make accurate diagrams to try and track all of the shipping going on.
 
I had thought about it but I'm not a huge fan of how the name sounds. Doesn't have enough syllables in "Kymai" to roll off the tongue as nicely as Eretria Eskhata.
Kymai the Northern? Or perhaps Kymai the Eastern?

This is doubly amusing because it will annoy the fuck out of the already-extant Neapolis just south of Kymai, which serves them right for making a deal with the Oscans.

I point you to the Phoenicians of Africa, so lazy that they name a New City twice.
 
I point you to the Phoenicians of Africa, so lazy that they name a New City twice.

Article:
Neapoli or Neapolis (Greek: Νεάπολη; Ancient Greek: Νεάπολις; 'new town') may refer to:

GeographyEdit

In India:

  • New Town, Kolkata, a planned city on the north-eastern fringes of Kolkata, the capital of West Bengal
In Greece:

In Italy:

  • The original Greek name of Naples, Italy
  • Neapolis (Apulia), an ancient city in Apulia, Italy
  • Neapolis (Sardinia), an ancient city the ruins of which are found in the comune of Guspini, Province of Medio Campidano, Sardinia, Italy
In Turkey:

In other countries:

 
I'd let the Kymians select the name of their city.

Meanwhile my previous remarks about the ideal Eretrian woman neglected the minority but strongly expressed opinion in favor of lithe, athletic young women; short of hair, exceedingly modest of bosom, and sharp of tongue who bear a completely coincidental but uncanny resemblance to their brothers.
 
Last edited:
I'd let the Kymians select the name of their city.

Meanwhile my previous remarks about the ideal Eretrian woman neglected the minority but strongly expressed opinion in favor of lithe, athletic, young women, short of hair, exceedingly modest of bosom, and sharp of tongue who bear a completely coincidental but uncanny resemblance to their brothers.

"Alkibiades rated your post 'Like' in the thread Magna Graecia Titanomachia (A City State Quest)"
 
Lets be clear here. While what Ireanos was wrong. By the standards of the time he isnt off his rocks loose cannon.

As Cetash has made a point to inform us, ancient warfare amongst the Greeks was a bloody thing. Where it was less about winning and more about massacring your enemies, depriving them of their manpower and thus insure that they cant never harm you again. This is exactly what we and Tara's did to the Peuketti and the Messapii, depleting their manpower to such an extend that they were forced to kneel or die.

Linos's position is a very just one. One that we inherently sympathize with. He is also very obviously being a manipulative politician. His dialogue was clearly designed to tap into Drako's words at the end of the Iapyian war. But where Drako was moved by sincere empathy. Linos was moved by both military reality and political acumen. Because while what Ireanos did was wrong, the propganda Campaign by Linos that forced him out hurts Eretria for the sake of his own glory. As it lost us the service of a proven general and all but assured Linos the complete control of the navy at a time period of titans clashing.

But the point is that Drakonid ads aside. There is a reason we were told the dialogue is going to be important. Not because of right or wrong but because it touches upon the deeply divisive founding of Eretria and the hypocrisy of our beliefs. Where Ireanos represents Herodion, Eusebios and Antipater in their adherence to the rule of blood. While Linos is the heir to Drako.

Exiling Ireanos is not only pointless and loses us a commander perhaps permanently it also misses the point. Exiling him won't make the seeds of philosophy grow. It will just exasperate the situation and create a divide.
I'd say Ireanos stepped out the established Eretrian tradition, that we are brutal and implacable opponents in war, particularly when provoked, but equitable and fair in peace.
The only occasions where we have conducted executions of the helpless were in cases of outright treachery and murder by our slaves, that I can recall.
 
I want to be even more clear. Exiling Ireanos would risk fucking shattering the Eretria social contract into pieces

@Erandil you argue we follow the example of Herodion and the Exoria. And I want to be perfectly clear on this. Herodion qnd the founding exorians started the tradition by voluntarily going away. While the rest were exiled for threatening our Democracy by bringing weapons into the assembly. Which looking back with the Kerkyra piece was a dangerous situation that could have endes in purges.

And what Ireanos did wasn't nearly so grave. So exiling him would cheapen the bonds of citizenship.

And of course. There is also the fact that it shits on the spirit of the tradition of Herodion. Has Cetash pointed out. One of the reasons our democracy is so stable is because our politicians can lose horribly. Get outplayed and utterly humiliated by their opponents and still be allowed to walk away and withdraw themselves to better themselves and wait for an opportunity. We don't punish them, we don't exile them, we just let them be.

As a result our politicians are willing to step back and suffer humiliating defeats rather than fight to the bitter end. Including with force.

But if we exile Ireanos who lost in politics and has already done what is expected, ie: resigned. We are fucking that system. Because now suddenly humiliating political defeats are existential threats now. The Antipatrids and Exorians won't stand for it. And I bet you that they definitely inherited Antipater and Herodion's fears of a Drako based oligarchy.

Not to mention risk turning Ireanos into potentially our Alcibiades since Syracuse is right there

Me: I want to exile the guy because he went against tradition, laws and basic rules of behaviour and encouraging others to follow him.

You: You can't exile a guy for being the loser in a political debate and/or military/campaign.

Please explain to me how you go from my point to yours...

And I am willing to bet good money that the political crisis you so desperately want to avoid will happen precisely because we will let viewpoints such as his germinate in our military and political elite.
 
I'd say Ireanos stepped out the established Eretrian tradition, that we are brutal and implacable opponents in war, particularly when provoked, but equitable and fair in peace.
The only occasions where we have conducted executions of the helpless were in cases of outright treachery and murder by our slaves, that I can recall.
And that's why he got owned by Linos yes. What he did was wrong even if its stepped in our bloody past. But he still went too far just as Eusebios went too far with the sacking of Brenton.

But it doesn't change the fact that the roots do exist. This is an opportunity to examine said roots.
 
Me: I want to exile the guy because he went against tradition, laws and basic rules of behaviour and encouraging others to follow him.

You: You can't exile a guy for being the loser in a political debate and/or military/campaign.

Please explain to me how you go from my point to yours...

And I am willing to bet good money that the political crisis you so desperately want to avoid will happen precisely because we will let viewpoints such as his germinate in our military and political elite.
Maybe you didn't notice the fact that what he did explicitly isn't against "tradition, laws and basic rules of behaviour" because otherwise the whole damn thing wouldn't have--
confronted for the first time in Eretria the subject of a just war, and the tension between the twin traditions of mercy in peace and grave destruction in war that the city carried since its founding.
Shit, I'm all in favor of the "Linean Ideal", as it were, but you're talking about burning down one of our best mechanisms for ensuring social stability all to do nothing, because the thing you're scaremongering against isn't "growing" in Eretria, it's been there from the start.
 
Last edited:
Woo! Finally back from vacation!

[X] [Colony] Pharos. The excellent natural harbor at Pharos would make it a fine place for a central Adriatic port, even if it has a larger indigenous population. [-40 talents of grain and construction costs, 600 colonists found Pharos, -100 pop from Eretria, 400 colonists found Issa, -50 pop from Eretria].
[X] [Lykai] Settle them in the new Illyrian colonies [+600 settlers in primary Illyrian colony, +200 in second Illyrian colony].
[X] [Kymai] We must save the city! [Begins the Kymai Rescue Quest Chain. -1 foreign mission for each Demos in the next election. Demes will put aside any complicated or military expeditions until the next election cycle].

I always thought that those islands in Croatia might have made for a nice urban center. I'm glad that, in this timeline, such a thing may come to pass. Of course, if we're picking Pharos, we should settle the Lykai there to counteract Pharos's larger indigenous population. I also think we have our hands full with the Enetoi and Sicily, so we can't really afford to rescue Kymai.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top