Darik29
Verified Delicious
I would love to write an author omake of it but it's too expensive to purchase ;v
What, the game? Isn't it on sale like every other month or so though?
I would love to write an author omake of it but it's too expensive to purchase ;v
Also, @Publicola @Simon_Jester @Telamon @Strypgia If you folks wanted to participate but hadn't seen the quest go up! I know there's some people who were past regulars (or who had likebombed the originals) still streaming in.
Yeah. This is actually a big reason in my voting for the Exoria guy for the, uh... speaker-to-foreigners. It's not necessarily that I consider his foreign policy to be best, though it's not bad, but... Well.The key to voting here is not to try to pick out which proposal is "best" or "most efficient" or whatever. It's a question of what Eretria needs right now. And it's also a question of figuring out if a particular candidate can actually deliver on promises, as handing over power to an incompetent with the best proposal is still handing over power to an incompetent and there will be attendant consequences.
Speaking for myself, I genuinely like the Exoria domestic policy platform and I was genuinely torn between him and Kyros. I consider both sewers and actually engaging with the metics to be important.I can't say I like the idea of this type of strategic voting where you're not really voting for the candidate you want but rather the balance of power but I guess it might be necessary. I'm not entirely clear on what the consequences are for lesser or greater majorities for the different parties in a single election are. It's not like anyone here is saying we never want to expand the Byssos Port or that we want to give the Antipatrids all the various offices of the state. Could you perhaps be bothered to clarify this issue, @Cetashwayo?
Aside from some myths floating around about a Captain Hellas who likes to chuck his round bronze shield at things, probably not.A question @Cetashwayo.
Has the discus ever been used as a weapon of war? That thing you throw is a few kilos of stone in flight.
Same for me, honestly. As is, without the augury, I would really much rather have the sewers than the temple, especially before the Antipatri set up their immigration program and bring to the city a sample of Italia's finest plagues. As I noted, it does increase the risk of the spy mission being a disaster to not go with the Antipatri, but I'd accept that increased risk for the decreased plague risk.Speaking for myself, I genuinely like the Exoria domestic policy platform and I was genuinely torn between him and Kyros. I consider both sewers and actually engaging with the metics to be important.
The cost. Fixing the temple gives us 5 years with a net income of 13 talents with our current income.Look. Is there some reason that cleaning up the city won't also be considered as preparation for or part of a beautification program that includes temple upgrading?
It would probably be a bad idea to elect a guy with Friendliness 2 to be our arch-diplomat. That is almost certainly not going to end well.
Really, a surprisingly number of ancient cultures more or less went with "If you can do a traditionally male job, you are perfectly fine if you dress up and do it as a man, and you will be considered a man for all intents and purposes, though nobody expects you to successfully sire a child and you don't get to drop that role ever." And somewhat less common(not sure if the historians aren't looking for it, or if the very common macho warrior cultures reject it) is the reverse.Given a lot of the obvious thematic connotations of that given the virginity element, I'm not sure I'd call it a massive leap forward for women's rights in general.
It's not generally that uncommon throughout many extremely patriarchal cultures that households where all the male heads of the family are out of the picture will end up with one of the surviving women taking charge. That can be seen from as diverse contexts as Tajik tribes in Afghanistan, to dynasties in the medieval, to the modern Mafia.
Yeah. This is actually a big reason in my voting for the Exoria guy for the, uh... speaker-to-foreigners. It's not necessarily that I consider his foreign policy to be best, though it's not bad, but... Well.
It would probably be a bad idea to elect a guy with Friendliness 2 to be our arch-diplomat. That is almost certainly not going to end well.
I'm sure that a low-Friendliness person can nonetheless be effective as a diplomat, sometimes, but it's not the way I'd want to bet.
"This dude is honorable and will keep his promises and holds great sway with his people" is probably the best diplomatic impression in the period. Being a stern fountain of rectitude who displays the virtues of austerity and manliness is quite possibly the best characteristic for a diplomat in most cases.
And there isn't an Ares/Aphrodite match up yet?Are we just shipping all the gods now? Or is that just grammar and I'm looking too much into it.
Sparta is developing into memetic Sparta as we speak, yes. On cultural output, although we have a lot of archaic material, I can't recall a lot of, if any material from Sparta in the period of the Peloponnesian War, though it may have just been a matter of it being transmitted through oral tradition rather than being written down.
I don't think we can describe any ancient society as totalitarian.
Whilst it's definitely true that we should be mindful of the men we send to represent us to others, I'm not sure that the Golden Ram will be a liability in leading a trade mission. Athenagoras Symmachos has managed to become the leader of a Demos in his own right, which suggests to me he is a persuasive and forceful personality, capable of making his case to others. Perhaps he can be blunt, but that is not necessarily a bad quality when haggling a trade deal.
I think it would be a mistake to assume that friendliness is a catch-all stat for diplomacy. Never did I actually say that, nor is friendliness the most important attribute for a diplomat in antiquity. The primary requirement of any diplomatic mission in the ancient world is that it inspires respect among those it is dealing with, which can be gained in any number of ways. Strength, honesty, and steadfastness are all more attractive qualities than mere gregariousness by itself. Respect is necessary to establish a common ground of negotiation.
"This dude is honorable and will keep his promises and holds great sway with his people" is probably the best diplomatic impression in the period. Being a stern fountain of rectitude who displays the virtues of austerity and manliness is quite possibly the best characteristic for a diplomat in most cases.
Given the absence of existing diplomatic institutions and persistent contact, as well as the primitive nature of diplomatic norms... yeah pretty much.
For the campaign proposals, user motions still exist. The ideas that the Drakonids campaigned with are already discussed in the assembly, it's new trade based proposals that we are losing out on by shoving them into a corner votes wise (well, that and city officials who support those proposals/ were picked to implement them, i'd imagine the Exoria really want the Chief of Public Lands onboard for their pet project, while Drakonia want the agoromonos to be on board with their plan for a calendar tracking team and exoria would likely prefer them to focus on the office of barbarian commerce).To be clear, I don't hate the idea of the Exoria getting the Xenoparakletor seat either; an alliance with the Messapii and isolating the Dauni aren't bad, although I would quite like the amber trade route and a punitive expedition against the pirates.
It's probably better though that it's a reasonably split vote between them and the Demos Drakonia for Xenoparakletor, as it appears to be heading, so that one faction doesn't end up getting totally marginalized with potentially Exciting effects on our politics. On a pragmatic level I also like a lot of the Drakonid proposals, so I'd prefer if they stayed part of the discourse, so to speak.
I also don't like the idea of letting the pirates hang around for another couple of years, but ultimately considered securing our home front ASAP so we can fight overseas without a major threat at the very least seriously distracting us in a place we really can't ignore. Making sure our borders are secure, we're ready to snap up the Messapii when they collapse, the Duani or our vassals aren't up to some shit, and laying the stones for a campaign against Taras all just seemed more important and time critical.To be clear, I don't hate the idea of the Exoria getting the Xenoparakletor seat either; an alliance with the Messapii and isolating the Dauni aren't bad, although I would quite like the amber trade route and a punitive expedition against the pirates. Especially the pirates, honestly; it sends a bad signal if we don't respond to something like that.
It's probably better though that it's a reasonably split vote between them and the Demos Drakonia for Xenoparakletor, as it appears to be heading, so that one faction doesn't end up getting totally marginalized with potentially Exciting effects on our politics. On a pragmatic level I also like a lot of the Drakonid proposals, so I'd prefer if they stayed part of the discourse, so to speak.
For the campaign proposals, user motions still exist. The ideas that the Drakonids campaigned with are already discussed in the assembly, it's new trade based proposals that we are losing out on by shoving them into a corner votes wise (well, that and city officials who support those proposals/ were picked to implement them, i'd imagine the Exoria really want the Chief of Public Lands onboard for their pet project, while Drakonia want the agoromonos to be on board with their plan for a calendar tracking team and exoria would likely prefer them to focus on the office of barbarian commerce).
Leukos the accountant:As my father's brother once told me, Barbaroi are like a pack of unruly mongrels.
It requires a stern will and a firm brow like a granite cliff to bring them to heel!
I mean, I'm not saying "friendliness is the diplomacy stat," I'm not an oversimplifying stupid child.I think it would be a mistake to assume that friendliness is a catch-all stat for diplomacy. Never did I actually say that, nor is friendliness the most important attribute for a diplomat in antiquity. The primary requirement of any diplomatic mission in the ancient world is that it inspires respect among those it is dealing with, which can be gained in any number of ways. Strength, honesty, and steadfastness are all more attractive qualities than mere gregariousness by itself. Respect is necessary to establish a common ground of negotiation.