Voting is open
I'm going to be honest, in the sheer volume of write-in plans and discussion I wound up overlooking it. Let me see.

EDIT:

Okay, I think my main turnoffs are "Victorian Sympathizers" (see response to QTesseract) and "Empty Spaces," both of which I specifically don't like.
I didn't have Victorian Sympathizers, but fair enough on Empty Spaces.
 
I didn't have Victorian Sympathizers, but fair enough on Empty Spaces.
Wait, crud. I see. Because unlike most plans you directly included the bonuses and penalties that come from the Ron Burns start, so you wrote "Victorian Attention" into your plan, and I saw "Victorian" and just thought "Sympathizers" because I wasn't used to seeing "Victorian Attention" in plans.

The Austrian Nazis were the ruling party at the time of the Anschluss, and had been since 1933. That's not really a comparable situation in the slightest.
Was it the fact that the Austrian Nazis were powerful that caused them to sell out their country? Or was it the fact that they were more loyal to ideology and (what they saw as) the unity of the greater German people, than they were to Austria specifically?

Or don't look at Austria. Look at numerous other European countries. Fifth columnists may not be quite as huge a threat as some in the era made them out to be, but it's not as simple as "eh, no one would ever sell out their country." It's entirely possible that some of our Victorian sympathizers will decide, when the chips are down, that they'd rather join with Victoria to 'put Chicago in order' (and maybe then create a quasi-Victoria-wearing-American-flag-as-cape "revivalist" polity of their own) than fight the people on the continent whose ideology they admire most and who (they believe) will probably just overrun Chicago anyway and cause needless bloodshed. Things like that happen, people do make that decision.

And yes, I'm sure many of the Victorian sympathizers won't make that decision. But it only takes a small number of traitors to cause a lot of damage when the enemy's spies are competent. Which we have to assume they are...

There's only so far you can go with that, though. Like, sure, try to use it as a guideline, but it doesn't work at that either because even after taking two giant leaps towards the reasonable in the form of Poptart's timeline edits and your reasoning....
Because- stop right there- a guideline is all I'm using it as.

What I'm trying to alert you to is that we should not just casually assume the Victorians don't do infiltration, sabotage, and sneaky tactics. The novel has them do it (unrealistically effectively). Poptart has them do it (they still, for instance, sneak a nuke into Atlanta. And Shanghai). The novel has them develop (unrealistically effective) tactics for it. Poptart has them train from highly competent secret services (the Okhrana).

We have less than zero reason to go "eh the Victorians don't do things like that."

If anything we should be specifically worrying about the prospect of Victorian spies, infiltrators, saboteurs, and raiders. That's not the only thing they may try to do to us, but it would be far better for us to prepare in advance for an espionage threat, than to deliberately leave ourselves wide open, then get kicked mightily in the shorts when it turns out that they're actually vaguely competent at espionage and like to use it.

It is very possible for the Victorians to try to infiltrate our society, gather intelligence on our layout and capabilities months in advance, send commando teams to be pre-inserted in Chicago territory, or raid guided by locals who know the area. At that time, having a ready-made splinter group of Victorian sympathizers whose loyalties will inevitably become divided when the living embodiment of the ideology they love

This part is a complete nonsequitor. What the heck does this have to do with you trying to use a ear to the ground as an anti smuggling tool?
It was intended as a response to "sabotage is hard, the Victorian sympathizers aren't a sabotage threat." My response is that they totally are, both in terms of sheltering actual Victorian saboteurs and in terms of them possibly developing plots of their own. And that furthermore, with our industrial capabilities being limited, our defensive depth being thin, and much of our military strength coming from a single elite military unit that could be badly harmed by one well-placed big vial of poison dumped in a field kitchen... We're unusually vulnerable to sabotage compared to most national militaries.

Import/Export Professionals does increase the infiltration threat, but realistically not by as much as Victorian Sympathizers. Firstly because it's a smaller malus. Secondly because it has an overtly declared effect that's already in play (higher crime, disrupted commerce) that makes it less likely that this is specifically a time bomb likely to blow up when the Victorians arrive.

...

Okay, basically, in conclusion, I think you are greatly underestimating the potential for harm that is implicit in having, say, 5% of our population (at a casual estimate) be sympathetic to the ideology of the conquering enemy who is going to attack us in a few years. You are treating it as not being a real intelligence problem at all, when in fact it is explicitly labeled as such. You are treating it as chiefly a political problem, when it's far from obvious how such a small minority can have major direct political impact and when political problems are specifically labeled under 'diplomacy.'

Your plan takes no precaution against the intelligence weaknesses created by Victorian Sympathizers, which will be amplified by Compromised. As such, it creates a serious weakness, and then does not seek out the corresponding bonuses that could reduce its effects. For this reason, it is not similar to Entrepot and people who vote for that plan may not want to vote for yours even though it has desirable bonuses Entrepot doesn't.

Maybe it got copy-pasted to the wrong response or something?
 
Last edited:
The current leading vote is Plan All the Economy at 33 votes, followed by Plan All-Round Start at 30 votes and Plan Security, Established, and Economy at 26 votes. If you'd rather the leading vote not win, now's the time to adjust your votes. (We have other plans that could win, but they're currently 10 or more votes behind.)
Adhoc vote count started by Derpmind on Mar 27, 2019 at 8:45 AM, finished with 242 posts and 78 votes.
 
[X] Plan Security, Established, and Economy

I prefer this to All The Eco. As self appointed representative of the People's Prosperity and Pizza Party, I think our focus should be on building ourselves up, not tearing others down.

Vickie Sympathisers and Greatest Sin are problematic to that goal, but I think not insurmountable with the bonuses SEE provides.
 
I prefer this to All The Eco. As self appointed representative of the People's Prosperity and Pizza Party, I think our focus should be on building ourselves up, not tearing others down.
May I convince you on all the economy, as well, much better it wins compared to all-round start. Because the plan for all-round start gives up the late game for bonuses in the early game, along with taking population boom and no-vaccines. Which could end very very badly.
 
May I convince you on all the economy, as well, much better it wins compared to all-round start. Because the plan for all-round start gives up the late game for bonuses in the early game, along with taking population boom and no-vaccines. Which could end very very badly.
My reason for not voting All Econ is that it's currently winning. I'd rather SEE win, but if it doesn't then All the Econ is likely to win anyway, and my voting for that in fear of All Round Start winning would essentially negate my vote for SEE.

That's kinda my problem with approval voting. By voting for something I find acceptable, I lose the chance at getting what I really want.

And I know that the whole point of approval voting is that it's better to get something you tolerate than something you hate, but...

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
My reason for not voting All Econ is that it's currently winning. I'd rather SEE win, but if it doesn't then All the Econ is likely to win anyway, and my voting for that in fear of All Round Start winning would essentially negate my vote for SEE.

That's kinda my problem with approval voting. By voting for something I find acceptable, I lose the chance at getting what I really want.

And I know that the whole point of approval voting is that it's better to get something you tolerate than something you hate, but...

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
we should implement glorious fractional approval voting :V
 
We will build a N&P within quest to get the full benefit of a democracy! That is free flow of all information!
 
[X] Plan Security, Established, and Economy
[X] Securing a better Tommorow V3
[X] Plan Entrepot
[X] Hellfire Burns Vs. The World
[x] Plan Set to soar
 
Last edited:
[x] Plan All-Round Start
-[X] Independent Merchants
-[x] Established
-[x] Good Security
-[X] Libraries
-[X] Population Boom
-[x] Disastrous Start

[x] Plan Just the Government
-[x] Disastrous Start
-[x] Established
-[x] Efficient Bureaucracy

[X] Plan Entrepot
-[X] Brown Water Navy
-[X] Independent Merchants
-[X] Ear To The Ground
-[X] Libraries
-[X] Population Boom
-[x] Import Export Professionals
 
Last edited:
My reason for not voting All Econ is that it's currently winning. I'd rather SEE win, but if it doesn't then All the Econ is likely to win anyway, and my voting for that in fear of All Round Start winning would essentially negate my vote for SEE.

That's kinda my problem with approval voting. By voting for something I find acceptable, I lose the chance at getting what I really want.

And I know that the whole point of approval voting is that it's better to get something you tolerate than something you hate, but...

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I've always seen it as being that when an approval vote is close, people are forced to think "but what do I really want?" And so they start discarding popular third-best plans in favor of less popular second and first-best plans, which is fine.

[] Plan All the Economy

Also meme

[] Hellfire Burns Vs. The World
Those plans are, like, exact opposites of each other. How is it that you approve of both of those plans, and no others?
 
[x] Plan All the Economy
[X] Plan All-Round Start
[x] Plan Entrepot
 
I would like to point out, once again, that the currently front-running plan "All the Economy," implied to mean "All the Economic Advantages," is also "All the Economic Disadvantages," or at least all the major ones except the flu outbreak.

That plus the problem of having to run a constitutional convention while an assassin with access to a highly placed traitor within our ranks is actively stalking and killing the delegates.

This plan is, in its way, as aggressively death-or-glory as Hellfire Burns vs. The World, in that it requires us to survive an overwhelming confluence of interlocking disasters in the opening phases to have any real chance of succeeding later on.

As a strategy for getting Chicago through to Year Five in one piece, I think it leaves a lot to be desired.

Though it's a great way to stress-test whether @PoptartProdigy is actually willing to Bad-End a quest within the first five or six turns.

[spoiler alert: I would bet a considerable sum of money that they totally are]
 
I would like to point out, once again, that the currently front-running plan "All the Economy," implied to mean "All the Economic Advantages," is also "All the Economic Disadvantages," or at least all the major ones except the flu outbreak.

That plus the problem of having to run a constitutional convention while an assassin with access to a highly placed traitor within our ranks is actively stalking and killing the delegates.

This plan is, in its way, as aggressively death-or-glory as Hellfire Burns vs. The World, in that it requires us to survive an overwhelming confluence of interlocking disasters in the opening phases to have any real chance of succeeding later on.

As a strategy for getting Chicago through to Year Five in one piece, I think it leaves a lot to be desired.

Though it's a great way to stress-test whether @PoptartProdigy is actually willing to Bad-End a quest within the first five or six turns.

[spoiler alert: I would bet a considerable sum of money that they totally are]
It's also the plan most likely to allow us to snowball considerably after the initial phases
 
I would like to point out, once again, that the currently front-running plan "All the Economy," implied to mean "All the Economic Advantages," is also "All the Economic Disadvantages," or at least all the major ones except the flu outbreak.
I mean, it does take 9 points of economic advantages for a cost of 6 points of disadvantage, so it's still net positive on investment for econ. And again, if we can make it through the first bit, it offers a chance of near unmatched snowballing.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top