This is based on Van Hal's own analysis last update:Veekie, your report is assuming the infiltrators are vampire-enhanced and the one pawing at the door is a vampire on basically no evidence. I know this is Stirland and it's usually vampires, but it's not always vampires.
I'd adjust the phrasing for that bit, however, we have to consider our employer's PoV as a devout sigmarite himself facing a lot of subversion hazards.Also you're shading Berthold's report to be 'The Sigmarite order is abusive and zealous' and not 'Berthold is friends with people who beat peasants for not knowing Sigmarite canon chapter and verse.' Those are different things. Since I very much don't want Berthold as the military advisor (his Order was deliberately xenophobic and refused to even converse with us, his friends beat people like us for laughs, he himself will very likely hold a grudge for us knocking him unconscious), you recommending him worries me.
I don't know Warhammer well enough to refute any of this. To me, 'inhumanly fast and strong but still bleeds' could be a variety of things.This is based on Van Hal's own analysis last update:
As he said:
-Not undead - They bleed
-Not shapeshifters - Their corpse is human
-Not magic - We checked
-Some vampire bloodlines allow enhancements of mortal servitors. The Von Carsteins are not known for using it much, but it's not something they're forbidden to.
Ergo, Occam's razor, it's a Renfield variant.
-The door was hammered by:
--Something human enough to have human mannerisms of frustration
--Something strong enough to shake a locked, MAGICALLY locked and extremely heavy door which we have trouble with even the locking bar of.
--Something smart enough to run away when the Greatswords show up.
--Something smart enough to run away from Greatsword and thus strong enough to think they can kill a Runefang wielding Elector Count AND a Journeyman Wizard and get away with it.
This rules out:
-Human - Too weak
-Monstrous undead - Too dumb, too inhuman, too slow
-Necromancer - Any spellcaster would be able to identify that the door is magically locked and thus go for a dispel rather than pound it vigorously for an extended period.
-Chaos Spawn - Being strong AND running away does not align with any typical mutant or beastman category
-Orc - Aside from having never SEEN an orc they would be rather distinct.
Which leaves well...its either a Vampire or a bloody Tomb King. Not many Tomb Kings in Stirland.
Van Hal specifically said the infiltrators 'could be humans enchanted ahead of time, could be mutants, could be empowered servants of vampires.' Van Hal never said a word about the thing at the door.He's a guy with Learning significantly higher than us, who's specialized in the Undead. His analysis is solid given the facts as much as a PhD in Undead could be.
You're advising to put a guy who pals around with people who beats non-Sigmarites in charge of an army composed of like 3/4ths non-Sigmarites. He solves one issue (doughty, unlikely to be subverted by vampires) with several others.I'd adjust the phrasing for that bit, however, we have to consider our employer's PoV as a devout sigmarite himself facing a lot of subversion hazards.
I cannot in good faith recommend against Berthold because he solves many of Van Hal's issues
Honestly, complaining about being drowned in red tape seemed foolish to me. We got a bad roll and failed to put together an intel network in the time allocated- why parade our failures, here? If we attempt to build contacts and fail again then we can start thinking enemy action but until then it seems unimportant to bring up.I'm willing to vote for this, but I'd suggest amending 'Plan Short and Simple' to include mention of the place that was being deliberately or non-deliberately drowned in red tape. I'm also not sure about calling Kasmir to the mat in the Incident Report, unless the Incident Report is also in private with Van Hal. Such a comment seems like it would come better from the head honcho.
However, we have a few issues:I don't know Warhammer well enough to refute any of this. To me, 'inhumanly fast and strong but still bleeds' could be a variety of things.
Van Hal specifically said the infiltrators 'could be humans enchanted ahead of time, could be mutants, could be empowered servants of vampires.' Van Hal never said a word about the thing at the door.
No, I'm advising that Otto might be the best, but will be expensive, while Berthold is cheaper, but comes with morale problems even if he's basically impossible to corrupt.You're advising to put a guy who pals around with people who beats non-Sigmarites in charge of an army composed of like 3/4ths non-Sigmarites. He solves one issue (doughty, unlikely to be subverted by vampires) with several others.
The repeatability of the one infiltrator that attacked us and the girl we caught trying to pick a door lock, bashed over the head and left in there? It's not like we gave them any but a cursory inspection.-Mutants we can disprove by their repeatability and visual inspection. Barring the direct intervention of a warp entity, you don't get repeatable mutations used as SERVANT infiltrators
There's morale problems ("some friction"), and then there is 'This guy's BFFs launch gang beatings on Morrites and Ulrichites, exactly like the majority of his new army.'No, I'm advising that Otto might be the best, but will be expensive, while Berthold is cheaper, but comes with morale problems even if he's basically impossible to corrupt.
There's morale problems ("some friction"), and then there is 'This guy's BFFs launch gang beatings on Morrites and Ulrichites, exactly like the majority of his new army.'
Uniques don't tend to infiltrate servants. And yes, given mutants, two of the same is a big deal.The repeatability of the one infiltrator that attacked us and the girl we caught trying to pick a door lock, bashed over the head and left in there? It's not like we gave them any but a cursory inspection.
All in favour of adopting "...and any infodumps you feel that Van Hal needs in the paperwork" as general catch-all on future reports?I'll also point out that there are written reports, so you can have a well-crafted sentence or two as the spoken report and any infodumps you feel that Van Hal needs in the paperwork.
-Some repeating what we told Van Hal seems somewhat unavoidable when we're telling the Council. And Markus already knows we KO'd Berthold.Also looks like plan Veekie is the one to beat, but I'll mention my problems with Exmorri's plan:
- There's a lot of cruft in the General Report and Incident Report, things we already told Van Hal. In particular it airs that we KO'd Berthold in front of the rest of the council, which seems unwise.
- The General Report suggests having other advisors funnel trustworthy people to us? Why would they do that, why would we trust them to know trustworthiness if they saw it (they aren't Intrigue characters), why wouldn't the 'trustworthy' people report everything they learn to the advisor who gave them to us?
- The Incident Report is claiming we're related to that village headman? I'm pretty sure that was a joke of BoneyM's, getting adopted.
- Incident Report also suggests Vampires when we don't know that for sure.
- The Private Report talks about the snake but has no new information for Van Hal, and the report on the swords suggests putting them back in the barrow - which has been cleaned and sanctified by Kasmir.
- It also asks for an enchanting lab, almost begging Van Hal to ask 'an enchanting lab where?'
I will take the advice for future reference, but that's funny coming from someone whose avatar text reads "I will punch you in the eyeballs with wooooooords!"I am all for the death of any vote that's about shoving walls of words into a PC's mouth when not prompted/without good reason - I seperately feel like there are issues with existing votes that are not present in this one, but honestly that's a secondary goal to 'no, bad wall-of-wordsing, bad, bad trying-to-do-the-thing-the-QM-does, bad, I have the spray bottle, stop it!'.
Aye.All in favour of adopting "...and any infodumps you feel that Van Hal needs in the paperwork" as general catch-all on future reports?