I'm sorry Mr Zoat but Paul's speech doesn't quite hang together like I'd expect it to. Up front he told us what he was going to do...
Then he explained the first step, understanding the purpose of the JL. That's a good start.
But then he just jumps into how they rate as individuals and he hasn't told us anything about the grading system at all, except that first step.
What's going on? Paul's better than that.
The grading system is keying off those elements mentioned in the description of the League's duties.
I want to see him start with Batman to make a point. When it comes to assisting in mundane crime, Batman's wonderful. Great analytical methods and resources. Supervillains? Batman's often better off flanking and being devious. Extraterrestrial threats? Leave the direct confrontation to Clark, Bats is better suited to intelligence and logistics. Natural disasters? His resources can definitely help, but he doesn't have, for example, powers that can help calm a volcano.
So he's definitely a valuable member of the team, but in terms of physical ability he doesn't really compare to the others. This means that instead of trying to play to strengths he doesn't have, he sould instead play to those he does have, in terms of investigation, planning, and strategy.
Personally, I loved in JLU how Batman actually got to play detective. Team needs to go tackle some stuff because a villain's holding WW's island hostage? "I have other things to do, you'll manage." Then later "hey, I figured out who this guy is and interrogated his colleague, let's go ransack his office for clues."
Starting off by pointing out how Batman can't outpunch, well, the vast majority of the team, can help soften the blow when evaluating people who *haven't* already come to that conclusion themselves (srs, if OL manages to tell Batman anything about himself he hasn't already taken into account, I'll be shocked).