Status
Not open for further replies.
It always surprises me when I hear people whose high schools didn't cover some of this stuff. We read quite a bit of the major philosophers, and the required economics class covered several practical subjects like how to write a check and balance a checkbook, buying a car, the basics of doing your taxes, how bail works, and so on, alongside supply and demand and all that jazz. This was public school in the US.
Whoa, what really. I hate to ask this but what state did you go to school in because literally none of that was covered except in the most general, this is a thing, terms.
 
"Take a look at yourself, and then make a change."
Is Batman ok with you using his quote here?

RE: Philosophy, yeah, I've not been too impressed by most of the work I've seen. Far too many times modern stuff is someone is feeling very proud about pointing out that you can form contradictions in English, normally due to using very weak definitions, or ignoring that most words only have meaning with respect to a context. Even filtering to published, commonly cited work, Stugeon's Law is in full effect.
 
Whoa, what really. I hate to ask this but what state did you go to school in because literally none of that was covered except in the most general, this is a thing, terms.
In terms of education rankings, it was a very middle of the pack state. To be fair, honors programs accounted for a lot of the philosophy reading. But the practical skills training? Everyone got that. I don't know if it was part of the state curriculum (thinking back, those modules weren't taught from the actual textbook), but the school made it part of the basic economics curriculum. This was before Common Core was a thing, though...
 
In terms of education rankings, it was a very middle of the pack state. To be fair, honors programs accounted for a lot of the philosophy reading. But the practical skills training? Everyone got that. I don't know if it was part of the state curriculum (thinking back, those modules weren't taught from the actual textbook), but the school made it part of the basic economics curriculum. This was before Common Core was a thing, though...
Definitely not NY/NYC then, cause that's where I grew up/graduated from high school. It's mind boggling that that's not standard cause I was in a top tier school...
 
Sure, let's spend 60% of the words discussing The Republic. The same document that said, "education is irrelevant unless you're a philosopher-king."
It should be noted that by Plato's standards nearly EVERYONE is a philosopher-king nowadays. Nearly everyone owns property (maybe not real estate, but property). Most people don't earn a living through hard manual labor. Everyone has to deal with diplomatic and political relationships on a regular basis. So the bulk of the population can, in classical terms, be considered to be a minor lord.

Whoa, what really. I hate to ask this but what state did you go to school in because literally none of that was covered except in the most general, this is a thing, terms.
In terms of education rankings, it was a very middle of the pack state. To be fair, honors programs accounted for a lot of the philosophy reading. But the practical skills training? Everyone got that. I don't know if it was part of the state curriculum (thinking back, those modules weren't taught from the actual textbook), but the school made it part of the basic economics curriculum. This was before Common Core was a thing, though...
If you went to high school in the 90s then that makes perfect sense; when I was in high school we had an entire course on household duties -- learning how to cook, learning the basics of how to sew, learning how to sanitize a kitchen, etc. They didn't call it "home economics" anymore because of the housewife connotations but it was a valuable class and I think modern students are poorer for lacking it.
 
Oh, and on the revised instalment:
from a glass house
throw my arms up
Thank you, corrected.
RE: Philosophy, yeah, I've not been too impressed by most of the work I've seen. Far too many times modern stuff is someone is feeling very proud about pointing out that you can form contradictions in English, normally due to using very weak definitions, or ignoring that most words only have meaning with respect to a context. Even filtering to published, commonly cited work, Stugeon's Law is in full effect.
Those are lexicographers. A noble profession to be sure, but not philosophers.
So you aren't going to add some lead up to the Garden of Eden? o_O
No more than already exists.
 
Last edited:
That's disappointing, I had rather hoped you would show Paul at least doing some research into the subject instead of him just handwaving away and assuming everything. :(
What do you mean? He learned the location of Eden the previous year from John. It was specifically mentioned. The other further research he could do would be to talk to Angela Spatchcock, and she doesn't really know that much. After he got the fruit he handed it over to Sephtian for a while. He doesn't really have the ability to research its functionality himself.
 
Sure, let's spend 60% of the words discussing The Republic. The same document that said, "education is irrelevant unless you're a philosopher-king."

He also said that "Gaurdians should oppose that which is unfamiliar" and be "impressionable, noble puppies".
It always surprises me when I hear people whose high schools didn't cover some of this stuff. We read quite a bit of the major philosophers, and the required economics class covered several practical subjects like how to write a check and balance a checkbook, buying a car, the basics of doing your taxes, how bail works, and so on, alongside supply and demand and all that jazz. This was public school in the US.
Without making my answer too long: I've lived around in the US, had secondary school in California, and personally, I learned little to nothing worth learning about taxation. I swear that there's a conspiracy to make the American public ignorant of the matter.
 
Last edited:
He learned the location of Eden the previous year from John. It was specifically mentioned.
Part of the more general problem is that you have a story that's measured in millions of words. People forget lots of those little details. I've read the entire story at least three times, and I briefly forgot during Demeanour that the SI can't say his own name. And have done the same a few times since then. In cases like this, you're expecting someone to remember what they probably considered fluff details from multiple years ago.
 
Part of the more general problem is that you have a story that's measured in millions of words. People forget lots of those little details. I've read the entire story at least three times, and I briefly forgot during Demeanour that the SI can't say his own name. And have done the same a few times since then. In cases like this, you're expecting someone to remember what they probably considered fluff details from multiple years ago.

But you may not be able to see very far in the Kryptonite fog.

I hadn't even remembered that until you mentioned it.
:lolDid you guys do that on purpose? :D:rofl:
 
:rolleyes:
TIL: Americans don't believe in volunteer work, or altruism.

I mean, looking at "americans" in general, yeah. There are plenty of exceptions, of course, but belief in capitalism is strong here, and if you believe capitalism can accomplish anything, why would you support volunteering or "handouts"?

Suffice to say I don't agree with this ideology at all, as I am a socialist, but I don't want to start a debate that gets the thread locked again. And Zoat seems to pretty clearly be a capitalist, going off of how he's written the story when capitalism is relevant.
 
Suffice to say I don't agree with this ideology at all, as I am a socialist, but I don't want to start a debate that gets the thread locked again. And Zoat seems to pretty clearly be a capitalist, going off of how he's written the story when capitalism is relevant.
It appears more that the Orange Light is inherently capitalist (expend personal power for personal gain) than any statement of the author's own opinions. In fact, the SI's inability to handle fiat currency early in the fic suggests that it's not "pretty clearly be a capitalist" at all.

(EDIT: Not to say that it's a sign that he's NOT capitalist, either, but rather that it's more nuanced than a simple label.)
 
Last edited:
I mean, looking at "americans" in general, yeah. There are plenty of exceptions, of course, but belief in capitalism is strong here, and if you believe capitalism can accomplish anything, why would you support volunteering or "handouts"?
Believing it's not the government's business is not believing it's nobody's business.
Yeah, uh, we pretty much...don't. Not to any significant degree...
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/volun.pdf
About 62.6 million people volunteered through or for an organization at least once between September 2014 and September 2015.
We pretty much do.
 
Last edited:
Yay for philosophy discussions! I know it may not be to some people's taste, but I like seeing them in superhero stories.
Yeah, I don't think the specific texts have come up, but since I have next-to-no knowledge of prior works, anytime I debate something like that I'm working on knowledge that I came up with from scratch, so its probably filled with oversights and issues that I don't immediately notice because I'm one person, but has been noticed and worked out by one of the thousands of philosophers of the past.
You took the words right out of my mouth, I have the same issue.
Back in the early days of the Dark Horse comics, they seemed to imply that the Xenomorphs had a subliminal psychic lure that encouraged people to rationalize making stupid decisions that would lead to approaching them in unsafe ways. It would explain a lot.
It also makes sense, considering the planet they evolved on. Judging from what the comic I read showed of it, having a stupidity-inducing psychic field that doesn't affect your own species sounds like one of the most effective ways of surviving a single hour.
I know you meant that sarcastically, but if you look at what people do instead of just what they believe, it does look an awful lot like that.
It also makes sense from OL's point of view, since his enlightenment means that doublethink is basically impossible for him. What he believes, he does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top