Because heat is invisible and thus blue beam of heat are as believable as red ones?
Because heat is invisible and thus blue beam of heat are as believable as red ones?
Religions really tended to hate lefties, Catholics were no exceptionPlease explain this phrase, I've never heard it before, and it makes little sense to me.
...stem cell research never slaughtered infants to get research material. That's literally impossible. You can't get stem cells from infants by killing them.
As another atheist I will tell you that...I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. That's not even remotely how it works.
Actually a beam of intense heat would be visible as either a line of intense heat shimmer, or as white flickering line as the air in the beam is ionized into plasma. The latter is what a strong enough infrared laser looks like as I recall, and that's as close to a "heat ray" as you'll get in real life.Because heat is invisible and thus blue beam of heat are as believable as red ones?
Actually a beam of intense heat would be visible as either a line of intense heat shimmer, or as white flickering line as the air in the beam is ionized into plasma. The latter is what a strong enough infrared laser looks like as I recall, and that's as close to a "heat ray" as you'll get in real life.
I think it's a bit of a lost opportunity, actually. If you aren't going to just use the classic red beam, then a line of heat shimmer would be instantly recognizable as "heat" to people, easy to special-effect, and cool looking.
Yes, apparently I forgot to add a word in there. Embryonic stem cell research source of research material is at a high proportion, from slaughtered babies. So, yes they do.
See above.
Source: journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2001/02/jdsc1-0102.html
Thank you, corrected.Particularly
Probably "three involved in", given it's OL speaking? Not entirely sure on how I'm parsing that.
third or fourth
Either "his" or "her", can't tell which. Unless you're doing something very strange with the pronouns, in which case I'd like you to telegraph that fact a bit more.
More or less.So if I'm following that correctly, England (1) is a subset of Britain, which is a governmental unit; and (2) is located on Great Britain, which is a landmass. Yes?
Invisible is fine. Superman Animated did it like that half the time. And if I remember correctly, New Adventures often used the red lines as a way of showing the audience where Superman was heat-visioning, with the beam itself being treated as invisible by the other characters.Because heat is invisible and thus blue beam of heat are as believable as red ones?
And the "heat ray" color in general. Martian heat ray. In all sorts of settings, when someone wants to portray a heat ray they usually make it red. Probably in analogy with fire and red-hot metal.Personally, I tend to assume that Kryptonians fire infrared lasers from their eyes, and the red we see is small amounts of that either burning particles in the air or dropping in frequency to show light from the red end of the spectrum. But why ever it started, red has been the heat vision colour for a very long time and is the heat vision colour.
Funny, I historically found Python's documentation to be among the better of what I'd used. Maybe it's gotten worse over time, or maybe its organization just happens to work well for my particular style. (For me, organization is less important than searchability; I don't care WHERE it is as long as I can find it on demand.)But for me, with my ADHD, or my brand of it, it makes it so so damn hard for me to sit down and LEARN it. When I was on Focalin CR I was blitzing through a Python MOOC it wasn't even funny. But then I hit a wall--loss of perscription and Python's shitty shitty refrence organization so I couldn't teach myself more.
In my own case, I'm pretty sure it isn't. It IS a developmental delay of sorts, and autism's symptoms are marked by developmental delays, but it's caused by a different root. I don't have the other textbook markers of autism.
My son is still too young for that to work. We tried it and all that happened was that he started using it as an excuse for everything instead of actually changing his behavior. He's only 10; I assume it'll be more effective in ~3 years.Oh god yes I remember those feels. There are two solutions I ran into, reading a shitton of novels, and actually taking a class. I was going into massage therapy and there was a class on, well, deportment and how to deal with things if a client goes emotional vomit on you. Spelling out "This is how you behave because of X" was amazeballs, my manners improved noticeably and consistantly after one damn day.
Oi, don't get personal, that's crossing the line. You're acting just as knee-jerk and opinionated about it as the argument you're criticizing.Are you one of those nutards that thinks women are sining whenever they 'fail' to get pregnant during their periods?
Personhood has nothing to do with it. Definitionally, an embryo is Homo sapiens sapiens and is a living being. Whether or not the embryo is a person doesn't change that it IS a baby. So from a strict definitional statement, it is a true statement that stem cells are collected from aborted humans. You can argue the morality and ethics of the act until you're blue in the face, but that doesn't change the fundamental validity of the claim.At what point an embryo becomes a 'person' is still hotly debated to this day, some retards go with 'at conception', some claim its when the brain is formed, others go at birth and others go with months after birth.
We need to know at what point you think an embryo gains personhood to properly debate you, and to know if there is a point in even debating you.
Happy to explain. The full name of my country is The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Island. On a map 'Great Britain' is the island on the right and 'Northern Ireland' is the bit on top of the island on the left. The full name is usually abbreviated to 'Britain', which is a bit less of a mouth full. Britain is (for most purposes) the name of the country. England is one of its constituent... Well, it's sort of a country as well, except it isn't. Same with Wales and Scotland, except that they get national assemblies/parliaments and England doesn't. Wales is the knob on the left of the island of Great Britain and Scotland is the top bit, England being the rest. It's called Great Britain not because it's wonderful but because it is bigger than the other island in the area.
Here it is in video format:So if I'm following that correctly, England (1) is a subset of Britain, which is a governmental unit; and (2) is located on Great Britain, which is a landmass. Yes?
Still waiting for that link because don't think most people appreciate this derail.
Yes; he's been all about going for what is advantageous or amusing right now, and not worrying about the consequences. But the consequences have begun catching up with him for a while now; more, he's actually realizing that the consequences are catching up with him. And that he's put himself in a bad position in all sorts of ways.Renegade has had lots of development, and the increase of lies is part of that. He is getting more and more lost and confused. This is intentional.
It's called Great Britain not because it's wonderful but because it is bigger than the other island in the area.
I'd say the latter is more likely. They'd probably horribly botch something as simple as 'inject volunteer pregnant women with the Danner Formula.'Going by history I'm rather worried about how any real world government would implement such a mandatory genetic treatment plan.
In the context of this story, I wouldn't trust an Earth government in a DC or Marvel setting for one moment with something like that. They'd either botch it horribly or use it for some kind of crazed super soldier program. Or a horribly botched super soldier program.
Because they threw away the red with Superman's trunks.I have just seen the DC television Dominators.
Why? Why would you do that?
Also, why is Supergirl's heat vision blue?
I know what you mean, but all I can see in my head is a really embarrassed Superman covering his crotch and saying "Somebody get me some pants or something!"
No, that sounds far too sensible to be the real reason.I've heard once that red doesn't show up on camera as well as blue does. I don't know if its true or not, but maybe that's why?
Even if that were true, it wouldn't apply to CGI effects because they aren't actually "on camera".I've heard once that red doesn't show up on camera as well as blue does. I don't know if its true or not, but maybe that's why?
When it comes to going all in on genetic screening and the like, of correcting genetic flaws, most people are fucking idiots.
If you can safely and reliably make it so that no one else ever has to be born with a flaw that, say, confines them to a wheelchair in early childhood? That's a good thing. Get things to the point that things like blindness or deafness are the result of accidents rather than something people can be born with? Also good.
When genetic engineering becomes a mature tech, it should be flat out mandatory.
then we run into the Seed Gundam issue
some moron won't like it and then it became racist issue all over again
There are two ends to the visible spectrum. Infrared lasers don't have anywhere near the energy that ultraviolet lasers have.The lasers that aren't in the visible light spectrum beat visible light lasers.
There wasn't any genetic modification in Gattaca. What they did was genetic screening. The doctor who did it specifically said that the resulting child would 'still be you, just.. the best of you'. If both parents had a gene which caused a particular adverse condition children born to them would still have it. That's why the main character's girlfriend and the company tester's son could have defects. And the test they used just tested to see whether the individual was the result of screening or not, not whether they were at Human peak or not. Gattaca actually was about prejudgement, as none of the elite had genes not also found within the general population.While over simplified this is actually relevent to the genetic engineering issue. Mainly that it may lead to issues where the people who instead of getting GE to remove possible genetic issues get improved far beyond the norm. This issue is brought up in Gattaca where a major theme is how unmodifed people are looked down upon by those 'gifted' with GE or those looking for the best possible candidates for a job to the point that possible employers would strictly focus on applicants genetics. A doctor at the beginning of the film outright talks a couple out of any 'flaws' no matter how minor it would be reasoning that as parents they should want the best possible future for their child.