Status
Not open for further replies.
Are these supposed to all be valid criticisms? Because I don't think that mentioning X means that he's setting up a plotline for X. He's just showing that Paul would be thinking about X at the time.

Unless he's diverging quite a bit from the source material at Cinema Sins, some are valid criticisms but quite a few are tongue-in-cheek. Cinema Sins has been known to sin a movie for "[Attractive Actress] is not giving me a lapdance in this scene".

Alex isn't quite as willy-nilly with the sins as Jeremy usually is. Like, how is someone being sexy onscreen by any metric a bad thing? But it's still a primarily comedic venture. None of it is meant to be taken as criticism, even if some of it might be valid. The CinemaSins formula is boundless unchecked negativity. That means if there's a momentary annoyance that's instantly addressed and not hard to figure out, that gets a sin. If there's a slightly inadequate explanation for a plot hole that most people wouldn't even notice, that also gets a sin.

It would be fully possible to easily counter-point the majority of sins. For an example, look up the YouTube channel CinemaWins. It's the exact same format, but with positivity instead. But at that point it ceases to be comedy and turns into a legitimate conversation. Boundless unchecked positivity isn't as funny. The Angry Video Game Nerd is also essentially a similar premise.
 
I doubt Nabu is that bad, but I could easily see him/it insisting on arbitrary rules like having a number somewhere not between letters 2-7, a capital letter neither first nor last, and so on. Instead of "Password1" you would then get "1Password", which is harder to write, but just as easy to guess. A very ordered approach to randomness, in other words, instead of just something like "correcthorsebatterystaple".
Post the comic.

xkcd: Password Strength

Greed and hope are interconnected, as both entail a discontent with the present and wanting a better future.
Ambition, want, desire, and hope are synonyms and neutral terms.
Avarice, covetousness, and greed are more like intense or selfish wants.
It's why the "Light of Avarice" has always bothered me, it implies only the negative aspects of wanting stuff or only being able to pursue desires in a negative manner without a wider perspective.

I mean, Ion is not the embodiment of arrogance, conceit, egotism, or solipsism. That's Malfeas. Adara is hope, not indolence, self-delusion or intemperance.

No, I think Hawkgirl accidentally flashing Grayven happened after the move to SV.
QQ Reference, and that was Hawkgirl not Hawkwoman, as you said. From Justice Lords-Earth not Renegade 16-Earth.
 
Last edited:
It's why the "Light of Avarice" has always bothered me, it implies only the negative aspects of wanting stuff or only being able to pursue desires in a negative manner without a wider perspective.

well to be fair to whoever named it, most examples they had to go on about it's nature where not exactly shining beacons of sanity and enlightened self interest.
 
when he gets around to setting up a pr department, then he can start working on rebranding it. That said, giving it a name like avarice might help drive home the point that using it is extremely dangerous, and does require a very specific mindset to use safely.
 
I think the writers were hoping to do the whole equal parts of good and evil or at least usually has positive and negative connotations. Like how red lanterns are usually raging beserkers who don't really care for right or wrong so long as they get to smash whatever is pissing them off, or how indigo lanterns are powered by compassion but usually are composed of brained washed horrible criminals forced to feel empathy for their crimes until the ring is removed. It's just a matter of intentions behind a person's action that are fueled by certain emotions, like how Sinestro imposed his will onto his planet to bring forced peace, or how Paul wants to help others or gains something from helping.
 
I think the writers were hoping to do the whole equal parts of good and evil or at least usually has positive and negative connotations. Like how red lanterns are usually raging beserkers who don't really care for right or wrong so long as they get to smash whatever is pissing them off, or how indigo lanterns are powered by compassion but usually are composed of brained washed horrible criminals forced to feel empathy for their crimes until the ring is removed. It's just a matter of intentions behind a person's action that are fueled by certain emotions, like how Sinestro imposed his will onto his planet to bring forced peace, or how Paul wants to help others or gains something from helping.
That's the point, Red and Orange Light are given names with negative connotations while the rest of the Spectrum of EMR between 390 to 700 nm(Why no Gamma or UV lanterns?) are given neutral names. Implying that those two are pretty much "evil" emotions, while the others simply have bad people using them.
 
Last edited:
Alex isn't quite as willy-nilly with the sins as Jeremy usually is. Like, how is someone being sexy onscreen by any metric a bad thing? But it's still a primarily comedic venture. None of it is meant to be taken as criticism, even if some of it might be valid. The CinemaSins formula is boundless unchecked negativity. That means if there's a momentary annoyance that's instantly addressed and not hard to figure out, that gets a sin. If there's a slightly inadequate explanation for a plot hole that most people wouldn't even notice, that also gets a sin.
They never really communicate that all that well. Yes, it's obviously comedy, but if you hadn't seen the movie or remembered it well enough, you could mistake a lot of what they're saying as actual criticisms. They're purposely disregarding some facts for the purpose of comedy and never make that known.

Also, they do occasionally give points for stuff, so you can't really say that they're unchecked negativity.
Ambition, want, desire, and hope are synonyms and neutral terms.
Avarice, covetousness, and greed are more like intense or selfish wants.
It's why the "Light of Avarice" has always bothered me, it implies only the negative aspects of wanting stuff or only being able to pursue desires in a negative manner without a wider perspective.
Well said. Related, I've had a problem with this line:
"The Ophidian is extremely intense emotion. Avarice. The emotional need for a thing.
If it was anyone else saying it, it'd be alright. But the Ophidian should realize that "the emotional need for a thing" is inaccurate. While that's close, I'd say that orange light works off of "emotional desire for the improvement of self" or something similar to that. Compassion could be described as "an emotional need for a thing", so long as that thing helps others. A definition of avarice, in the context of this story, that doesn't include the concept of doing things for yourself is incomplete. It doesn't distinguish itself from compassion.
when he gets around to setting up a pr department, then he can start working on rebranding it. That said, giving it a name like avarice might help drive home the point that using it is extremely dangerous, and does require a very specific mindset to use safely.
Well, "avarice" is a word specific to English. He can just start calling it something else, and it really doesn't affect anything.

Changing the name for the sake of future recruits wouldn't accomplish much, as they're hearing a translation of the concept he's trying to convey, and his understanding of the orange light wouldn't have changed.
 
Don't mean to be a broken record, but I have another continuity question for Mr. Zoat, this time regarding Poison Ivy. In response to a question of what happened to her after she was depowered, originally you said:
Article:
She spent some time in Belle Reve before transferring back to Arkham. She's barely responsive to external stimuli anymore. After testing showed that her floromantic powers really had been removed she was transferred to a more normal assylum.


But in Bindings we see that she's just in a less secure part of Arkham. Can we try to come up with a No-Prize explanation or do we just call this a retcon? :p

To go on a different tangent, my next question is about something from the comics. In the New Earth continuity, apparently, New Gods are imbued through the source to gain their powers. From the DC Database entry on New Genesis it says:
Article:
Each Genesisian goes through a ceremony known as "The Rite of Ascension" that imbues them with power from the Source in order to officially become a New God.

And here it states:
Article:
Like all New Gods, Scott Free was meant to undergo the rite of ascension and claim his "god power," something he had long resisted. He and Barda were living on New Genesis where she had tried to train another band of Female Furies (she found their mettle lacking). Scott fled from the ceremony at the last moment and when he was gone, forces from Apokolips appeared and attacked Barda. Granny Goodness speared her through the back and chest and the Black Racer took her to the afterlife, to a realm called Hadis.

If I recall correctly, you said that Universe-16 New Gods don't tend to mainline external sources of power except for a few like Darkseid with the Omega Force or Highfather with the Source. So is the Rite of Ascension just not a thing for New Gods on Universe-16?
 
Last edited:
Don't mean to be a broken record, but I have another continuity question for Mr. Zoat, this time regarding Poison Ivy. In response to a question of what happened to her after she was depowered, originally you said:

"She spent some time in Belle Reve before transferring back to Arkham. She's barely responsive to external stimuli anymore. After testing showed that her floromantic powers really had been removed she was transferred to a more normal assylum."

But in Bindings we see that she's just in a less secure part of Arkham. Can we try to come up with a No-Prize explanation or do we just call this a retcon? :p
She was like that to start with, then she sort of rebooted.
 
Don't mean to be a broken record, but I have another continuity question for Mr. Zoat, this time regarding Poison Ivy. In response to a question of what happened to her after she was depowered, originally you said:

"She spent some time in Belle Reve before transferring back to Arkham. She's barely responsive to external stimuli anymore. After testing showed that her floromantic powers really had been removed she was transferred to a more normal assylum."

But in Bindings we see that she's just in a less secure part of Arkham. Can we try to come up with a No-Prize explanation or do we just call this a retcon? :p
It's not unprecedented for Zoat to change his mind on things. As I recall, he'd originally planned for OL to be receptive to Zatanna's advances.
She was like that to start with, then she sort of rebooted.
That works, too.
 
Why no Gamma or UV lanterns?
I actually had a really good fridge-brilliance answer to this question (as well as "why no infrared") a while back:

With few exceptions, nearly all life in the greater universe evolved to perceive roughly the same band of frequencies [of light]. Some might be a little broader or narrower, some might be a little higher or a little lower, but that general region of the spectrum is noteworthy for being particularly information-dense. Lower frequencies scatter more; higher frequencies tend to penetrate instead of reflecting. That humans are sort of uninterestingly average is a fairly common trope in general, so applying it to visual perception isn't really that out of place.

Furthermore, if the emotional spectrum IS somehow fundamental to the universe, then that's an ADDITIONAL pressure to evolve around that range, as well as a pressure among races who have discovered it to develop similar cultural associations with the visible color and its emotional resonance.

[...]there's no particular significance to red and violet being the edges of the spectrum. The only one that really matters is that Green is in the middle and the rest spreads out from there. If there's an "infra-rage" or an "ultra-love" then I would imagine that they're not particularly universal in their visibility, just like infrared and ultraviolet.

In fact, the presence of Indigo suggests that the spectrum's curve ISN'T calibrated specifically to human eyesight because the high-frequency components are spaced closer together than the low-frequency ones. Maybe humans aren't very good at seeing love? It would explain a lot.

[...]in places where [emotional light] IS more visible that they would comprise further [evolutionary] pressure to have vision encompass it.

I'm also suggesting that the emotional spectrum represents some fundamental truths common across all species that have evolved emotional self-awareness, whether they're visible as light or not.

Basically, I'm saying that it isn't a coincidence that both the lights and the emotions fall inside a range that humans are capable of experiencing, but rather that the nature of the universe makes it to where most intelligent life would have them in common.
 
Reading Dial H, I have to say the bleedtech of the dial users is in the running for most impressive technological civilization in the DC franchise.

Dials to create portals to other universes, dials to turn into superheroes with a flick of a wrist, dials to conjure up gadgetry from all across the multiverse, dials to summon up apocalypses, technology to enhance a hero transformation (or fiddle with them to hybridize them.)

Which makes the Operator society's supposed destruction seem rather unlikely.

Now I'm picturing a Paul with a dial. I suppose the most in theme would be a gadget dial user, summoning gadgetry at random (Well, with a working dial and the knowledge to use it, a user would get exactly what they want each time, but that's a bit much for a starting point).
 
Pavlos is the current Agent Orange, he can bloody well rename it to Desire or Want or Whatever.

OL: "I hereby announce this name from henceforth: the Orange Light of Aspiration!"
~


I'm new to SV, and signed up partly because of this story. Just adding another drop to the OMGTHISSTORYROCKS bucket. Lake. You know...
If there was discussion about this earlier and I missed it, I'd love for someone to point me in the right direction, but has anyone talked about what Lantern colors other members of the team best fit? Granted, character development means that you can't argue all of the obvious first thoughts even if some do apply.

Kon El and M'gann, might be stereotypical, but could you argue yellow for Artemis (her past) or Wally (esteem issues and eating disorder)? For that matter, after his adoption, I really could see blue Superboy as his life keeps getting better.

Well, no matter what, this is an EPIC story in every sense of the word.
 
Ultraviolet lanterns are mimes; that's why you can't see the construct boxes they keep sealing themselves into.

Nobody can get an answer as to what emotion the UV Light represents; because, well, mimes.
So Havelock Vetinari killed the lot of them, basically
It would be really inconvenient to give cancer to everyone around you whenever you use a construct. And to constantly increase the risk of cancer to everyone around you with your environmental shield.
What about UV and Gamma Embodiments? Also, Emotional Light doesn't act like regular light I should think.

Wait, how did OL use Gamma Light(EM Radiation) against Clayface when he can only make Orange Light(EM Radiation)?
I actually had a really good fridge-brilliance answer to this question (as well as "why no infrared") a while back:
Kryptonians, and I suspect Maltusians, and plenty of those other "bullshit OP" races that litter DC are tetra if not penta chromatic.
 
I see no reason to assign special meaning to the visible colors of the emotional spectrum, really.

Constructs can be different colors- Like Kyle's accidental creations Oblivion and his personal green lantern corps.

The energy the Corpse uses is purple, and since the Guardians are allergic to using other emotions that leaves the purple power of the Corpse willpower in a hat and fake moustache.

And there's at least one lantern who doesn't even have a concept of color- Rot Lop Fan, who thinks he's a part of the F Sharp Bell corps.
 
Also, Emotional Light doesn't act like regular light I should think.
It doesn't, but it does still emit actual light of the appropriate color. In the dark, OL's surroundings are orange when he uses a construct.

Maybe it's the Gamma Light of Giving People Cancer?
Wait, how did OL use Gamma Light(EM Radiation) against Clayface when he can only make Orange Light(EM Radiation)?
He can't make constructs different colors, but he can make construct mechanisms to produce the correct color of light. He's not making lasers by having a section inside the construct glow extra bright, he's making an actual laser mechanism.
 
So Havelock Vetinari killed the lot of them, basically

What about UV and Gamma Embodiments? Also, Emotional Light doesn't act like regular light I should think.

Wait, how did OL use Gamma Light(EM Radiation) against Clayface when he can only make Orange Light(EM Radiation)?

Kryptonians, and I suspect Maltusians, and plenty of those other "bullshit OP" races that litter DC are tetra if not penta chromatic.
Doylist: You can't draw images that are infrared, gamma or ultraviolet coloured

Watsonian: The white light of life demonstratably splits into the 7 emotional lights. If there were other lights, they'd be detected and used; they haven't been, therefore they don't exist
 
Wait, how did OL use Gamma Light(EM Radiation) against Clayface when he can only make Orange Light(EM Radiation)?
Something that OL has learned with experience is that he can create additional effects USING constructs instead of having the constructs themselves be the ability.

If he tries to create light, the only light he can create is orange. If he tries to fire an offensive beam, the only beams he can fire are orange particle beams or orange energy beams, and those are ridiculously power-intensive.

But with construct practice, he has learned to go second-order, using constructs and other powers to build things that can do other things. He can, for example, transmute or subspace a tungsten filament and pump energy through it to make a light bulb that emits normal blackbody radiation. And in the case of the Gamma Cannon, he might be transmuting a critical mass of a radioisotope or pumping electrons of normal matter with enough energy to make them re-emit at a higher frequency.

Watsonian: The white light of life demonstratably splits into the 7 emotional lights. If there were other lights, they'd be detected and used; they haven't been, therefore they don't exist
I disagree with this argument. It could be that other lights exist but are harder to detect and therefore haven't been used. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, and all that.

Besides, that only would provide evidence THAT there isn't, not an explanation WHY there isn't.

EDIT: Also, considering UV is often called "black light" and people are familiar with the phosphorescent effect it has on (for example) white cloth, you could most certainly draw a UV Lantern in a meaningful and interesting way.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top