K von Carstein
Likes to go for a walk
- Location
- Belgium
- Pronouns
- He
Isn't Galadriel supposed to live in Lorien? It has been a long time since I read the Silmarillon so I don't remember when she arrived there.
Not yet. Amroth still rules those forests and he will not pass to the West until near the second millennia of the Third Age.Isn't Galadriel supposed to live in Lorien? It has been a long time since I read the Silmarillon so I don't remember when she arrived there.
I mean, I would argue that our position regarding the Middle-Men is basically uber-Faithful when it comes down to it, so it will affect how the King's Men vision of us, as it should since it make sense in the setting. More broadly speaking, I'd arguing that while taking a position that is very much in minority in the society in which the PC, whether its a person or an entity, evolve can open interesting potential storylines (and I obviously understand the attraction of picking options that better fit what we known to be morally right) but it also should come with extra challenges to reflect the fact that the PC is swimming against the tide, so to speak...Well, Galadriel says we might be able to stay in the middle for about another century, perhaps two at the outside, if I recall her words in the last update.
That's not a long time to a Sea-Lord, but it's still a considerable time to secure our position, trade networks, and allies. Right now our colony is still a fledgling, with no hard shell, few claws or teeth, vulnerable. If we can secure this alliance with Tharbad and the local Middle Men, set up our trade networks, and build up the industry and defences that we have planned, rather than the vague chalk outlines that we have at the moment, then we are in a position to openly declare a faction.
Also, if we're being entirely honest, it's already pretty clear that we're tacitly extending friendly feelers to the Elves and aligning ourselves with the Faithful - Galpazath pretty much hints as much openly. But if even the fig leaf of neutrality confers some protection and keeps some doors open, then whilst it's still possible I think we should take it while we can get it.
While I essentially entirely agree with this, I'd like to add that I'm a little concerned that prolonged cultural contact with Numenor/the King's Men will sway at least some people in the colony towards continually more radical views. Like, as it stand right now, no one in the colony (I think...) is pro-blood orgy/cannibalism/human sacrifice, but as those who define themselves politically as being King's Men see and are exposed to that political group increasingly embracing that, they probably will too. It's difficult for me to see a way out of that particular trap that doesn't involve one of:I mean, I would argue that our position regarding the Middle-Men is basically uber-Faithful when it comes down to it, so it will affect how the King's Men vision of us, as it should since it make sense in the setting. More broadly speaking, I'd arguing that while taking a position that is very much in minority in the society in which the PC, whether its a person or an entity, evolve can open interesting potential storylines (and I obviously understand the attraction of picking options that better fit what we known to be morally right) but it also should come with extra challenges to reflect the fact that the PC is swimming against the tide, so to speak...
Mind you, nothing in this means that we should give up working on our relationship with the King's Men yet. On the contrary: they aren't going to like us but we don't need them to, we merely need a functionnal working relationship with them. The day will come when won't be able to maintain it without loosing our soul but we should do our best to make sure that such a day is as late as possible...
Well, given what ended up happening to Numenor, I'm not sure many would be staunch supporters of the King's Men. Sure, Sauron played the role of the tempter and deceiver excellently, but the attempted invasion of Valinor was just the logical conclusion of the philosophy of the King's Men, and their complete rejection of the Valar, their bitter jealousy of the Elves, and their desire for total domination over the entire world. The path they want to follow is one we know leads only towards damnation, and while the King's Men may not be there yet, there're already signs of the rot that will come to a head under Ar-Pharazon.If the quest becomes sufficiently active again to get to the point where the King's Men vs. Faithful debate comes into focus
The benefit, I would say, is hopefully to convince some of the more reasonable King's Men - those in our own city, as well as elsewhere - that we understand and are empathic to those of their concerns and goals that aren't colonialism, mass-murder, slavery, human sacrifice and cannibalism. It's probably super overly-ambitious, but what I'd like to do is create a sort of midway point political identity that rejects all the unsavory parts of the mainstream King's Men's positions, while at the same time rejecting the Faithful's adherence to and acceptance of certain gross, awful notions in Illuvatarian theology. If we can show the more moderate King's Men that yeah, we agree, dying of old age sucks, the Ban is stupid, and we are just as upset about this stuff as they are, we can hopefully convince them to at least stop taking out their anger at Eru's and the Valar's myriad injustices on people that are innocent of it. You could maybe argue that the Aman-dwelling Eldar are complicit in the Valar's BS, but at the very least the Elves of Middle Earth, and especially our fellow mortals, are absolutely blameless, and we should be uniting with them to create a utopia on Middle Earth and shove our glorious accomplishment up Manwe's pompous, blustery rear end.Regardless, it's far from clear such a path actually has any measurable benefits for us. If you can get past pure ego and the obsession with power and map-painting, trade and cooperation deliver the same benefits without the downsides of war and bloodshed.
This is completely absurd. Rejecting the Gift of Men is the heart of King's Men philosophy and if we agree with them on that we're a King's Man and that's all there is to it.The benefit, I would say, is hopefully to convince some of the more reasonable King's Men - those in our own city, as well as elsewhere - that we understand and are empathic to those of their concerns and goals that aren't colonialism, mass-murder, slavery, human sacrifice and cannibalism. It's probably super overly-ambitious, but what I'd like to do is create a sort of midway point political identity that rejects all the unsavory parts of the mainstream King's Men's positions, while at the same time rejecting the Faithful's adherence to and acceptance of certain gross, awful notions in Illuvatarian theology. If we can show the more moderate King's Men that yeah, we agree, dying of old age sucks, the Ban is stupid, and we are just as upset about this stuff as they are, we can hopefully convince them to at least stop taking out their anger at Eru's and the Valar's myriad injustices on people that are innocent of it. You could maybe argue that the Aman-dwelling Eldar are complicit in the Valar's BS, but at the very least the Elves of Middle Earth, and especially our fellow mortals, are absolutely blameless, and we should be uniting with them to create a utopia on Middle Earth and shove our glorious accomplishment up Manwe's pompous, blustery rear end.
It's not just theology, it's how the world is. There's no discussion to be had. Eru has decreed Men were mortals, and they are. And allowing humans in Aman would make them even more bitter and absolutely not help.rejecting the Faithful's adherence to and acceptance of certain gross, awful notions in Illuvatarian theology.
I'm not saying we declare war on the Valar, or go on some fruitless quest for immortality, which, yeah, can't be achieved by humans because Eru is a scumbag. I'm just saying we acknowledge the King's Men's very legitimate grievance with the "gift" of men. I'm saying we try to find common ground with them where we can, not that we support their worst impulses.
The idea that humans only fear death because of Morgoth is patently ridiculous, and exactly the sort of Valar/Eru party line stuff I want to denounce. If I've got a wonderful, happy life, surrounded by friends and family, in a home that I love, it doesn't matter if whatever-Eru-has-in-store-for-mortals-after-death is a paradise that makes Valinor look like Mordor by comparison, I wouldn't want to be forcibly separated from that life, that home, and those people, and calling that forcible, painful separation a "gift" is cruel and insulting.
Also, the whole "we can't let mortals into Aman because it would make them bitter and resentful" thing is pretty morally suspect, if you ask me. Like, imagine you have an affluent gated community, and the owners say "Oh, we don't let those types in here - if they see what they can't have, it'd just make them uppity." That isn't a particularly convincing argument, from where I'm standing.
But war on the Valar is exactly where those grievances lead to. If you're unhappy with the Gift of Men you're going to be unhappy with Eru who granted it and the Valar who are His agents. The only thing your common ground would do is make King's Men ideology more widespread in the colony.I'm not saying we declare war on the Valar, or go on some fruitless quest for immortality, which, yeah, can't be achieved by humans because Eru is a scumbag. I'm just saying we acknowledge the King's Men's very legitimate grievance with the "gift" of men. I'm saying we try to find common ground with them where we can, not that we support their worst impulses.
The idea that humans only fear death because of Morgoth is patently ridiculous, and exactly the sort of Valar/Eru party line stuff I want to denounce. If I've got a wonderful, happy life, surrounded by friends and family, in a home that I love, it doesn't matter if whatever-Eru-has-in-store-for-mortals-after-death is a paradise that makes Valinor look like Mordor by comparison, I wouldn't want to be forcibly separated from that life, that home, and those people, and calling that forcible, painful separation a "gift" is cruel and insulting.
Also, the whole "we can't let mortals into Aman because it would make them bitter and resentful" thing is pretty morally suspect, if you ask me. Like, imagine you have an affluent gated community, and the owners say "Oh, we don't let those types in here - if they see what they can't have, it'd just make them uppity." That isn't a particularly convincing argument, from where I'm standing.
Your objection to death predicates on the idea that death is the end, period, nothing-after. All Men go there, in time. The Elves are "immortal", but they are inextricably tied to Arda in particular. They can go no farther than Valinor. At least not until Dagor Daggorath is done and gone and everything is made new.I'm not saying we declare war on the Valar, or go on some fruitless quest for immortality, which, yeah, can't be achieved by humans because Eru is a scumbag. I'm just saying we acknowledge the King's Men's very legitimate grievance with the "gift" of men. I'm saying we try to find common ground with them where we can, not that we support their worst impulses.
The idea that humans only fear death because of Morgoth is patently ridiculous, and exactly the sort of Valar/Eru party line stuff I want to denounce. If I've got a wonderful, happy life, surrounded by friends and family, in a home that I love, it doesn't matter if whatever-Eru-has-in-store-for-mortals-after-death is a paradise that makes Valinor look like Mordor by comparison, I wouldn't want to be forcibly separated from that life, that home, and those people, and calling that forcible, painful separation a "gift" is cruel and insulting.
Also, the whole "we can't let mortals into Aman because it would make them bitter and resentful" thing is pretty morally suspect, if you ask me. Like, imagine you have an affluent gated community, and the owners say "Oh, we don't let those types in here - if they see what they can't have, it'd just make them uppity." That isn't a particularly convincing argument, from where I'm standing.