We're here, doing it.
The narrow focus get stronger vote would have been one of the other two SLs. Instead we jump on this one (I think ) the first time it shows up.
We're doing it in a way that showcases our strength, because reminding people we're better than them is its own virtue.
Show them we earned it and all that.
Show them they can't do what we are.
Being here is better than nothing in purely social terms, but if my argument rested on this not being true, I wouldn't be making it because it would be an obviously false premise.
Mechanically, I do expect to get some social-relevant exp from the event. Narratively? Fuck no, Ling Qi hasn't done a single thing so far that demonstrates or should lead to greater social adeptness or even
tolerance for noble gatherings. Her empathy scanning of people from a distance was her sole performance and basically a repeat of Renxiang's gatherings. They're still "others" who she does not, probably can't effectively, and didn't try to engage with. Granted, Luo basically flung her off into the wilderness where she
couldn't, but that was our choice as players.
A social strategy that lies principally in sidestepping actual social engagement, of any stripe, is fundamentally and deliberately one that doesn't rely on social skills. Claiming an event where we pursue that strategy is a good-faith effort to "enter the political arena" strikes me as disingenuous. It's not actually developing skills. It's trying not to. We're not Cai Shenhua, we can't blow off politics. Cai Shenhua isn't Cai Shenhua enough to blow off politics.
I do agree, and honestly find the framing here annoying. Ultimately, while I think we'd contribute best in the bait position, I'm fine with either. If there are lots of other people keen to be bait then I don't see any need to tand in their way. The "going for glory" justification isn't really one I like.
... At the same time though, either option can easily be portrayed badly. Bait can make us look like we're just trying to show off, archery can make it look like we're trying to foist our dangerous idea off on others.
On the other hand, we explicitly voted to show off on the first place, and that... didn't really pan out. We traded away a more ideal social opportunity for it, so it seems weird to second guess
to that less neutral position because we haven't yet accomplished the goal we set out to attempt? Why would Ling Qi change tack now, basically? It doesn't seem coherent to me. She either meant her reasons in the first place or she didn't. I don't see how the context has changed to prompt the diversion. The hunt she opted for hasn't
actually happened yet, after all.
Waffling back and forth in events doesn't have the best track record, which kind of makes sense since it plays merry hell on the narrative inertia. We'd be better off if we closed the deal on more of our choices. Obviously imperfect knowledge is always a thing, but that doesn't seem especially relevant here.