I don't think so. Rather, similar to us she sees that the only path is major systematic and structural reform. The empire must change.
Jiao and An were I think limited first in they were largely focused on clearing out corruption, and potentially started with a bit of a naive vision that if they could just clear that out then everything would work, and then eventually realised that the problems run right to the roots of the empire and didn't know how to handle that, since they were built to cut away bad things. They weren't really builders per se, while Xiang is and it's why she's capable of going "ok so basically we need to rebuild how the empire functions from the ground up". In contrast Jiao broke since stabbing the empire to death to save it doesn't really work.
Hmm... I'm not sure if I agree, at least myself.
Firstly, I just am not sure that she has really undertaken much in the way of major systematic and structural reform, at least that seems clear to me. An did do quite a bit of structural moving and shaking, and
quite a bit of institutional re-building. In terms of political moving and shaking, those these are kind of local things, he made to neutralize the rivalry politics between the imperial throne and the Bai by marrying one of their own, and then after the backfired spectacularly to do so via another route by weakening the Bai by allowing the Western Territories and Sun Shao to happen. He also allowed the revolutionary reformation of the Emerald Seas by very deliberately allowing the Hui to be taken down and replaced by the Cai there. But on the larger and institutional level he is
accomplished - he created the Great Sect systems and the Ministry of Integrity, and we keep seeing the reverberations of the creations of the institutions come up again and again within the provincial setting of the game and among the other provincial nobility that Ling Qi talks to.
Xiang on the other hand, really has just about fuck-all to compare to this that I'm aware of; the Celestial Peaks nobility are engaged and interested in what she's doing, even if they challenged her to a degree up until she hit White, but her presence has been nearly entirely absent from the Empire at large otherwise. Every time the Empire as the
Empire has come up in a way relevant to us, it hasn't been Xiang, or Xiang's institutions, it's been An's institutions - and she's not early on in her Way either, she's White. If her goal is to seriously structurally reform the Empire, I would really expect to see some... structures out of her. But instead we're at the point where the empire just straight-up Balkanizing due to central neglect seems entirely reasonable.
Secondly, if the conclusion that she reached
is that "Virtue and the Sage's Empire cannot coexist", but she made it part of her Way and continued cultivating instead of letting it break her like Jiao, then I don't think reformism is fundamentally compatible with that Way. Even if you reform the Sage's Empire, it will still be the Sage's Empire - after all, it isn't exactly like the Empire now exactly matches the Empire of the Sage himself, it's three dynasties, millennia, and loooads of politics and catastrophes in. There's no way to reform it until it can escape the inescapable rot that Jiao An and presumably Xiang all saw and become virtuous instead - Virtue and the Sage's Empire cannot coexist.