Being punched by someone has a way of making you dramatically re-evaluate the way you think about them.I mean the only reason Rhaenyra is heir at all is because Vizzy thinks of if as a way to "fix" what he did to Aemma. She is the last remaining piece of his first wife it's why despite everything and how pliable he usually he dug his heels in about Rhaenyra being heir. He wouldn't disinherited over a punch for something he feels guilty of doing, he isn't the level head about her or Aemma.
Is she older? I forgot, but weren't she of a similar age to Rhaenyra?This does make wonder about Joanna though. I can't see Vizzy doing the same thing he did to Alicent to her. Alicent was basically isolated with only really her father there and I don't think he would've lost sleep if she died. Joanna though she's older and seems to have established herself with people from home around her. So I can see putting her foot down if he pushes to hard.
Nah she was 16, Rhaenyra even remarks that all women not married were of her age when searching for brides.
I don't think this would actually work out, because while Viserys is absolutely vulnerable to being manipulated and squeezed by family members (e.g. Daemon), he's not gullible. And if someone keeps using the same manipulation tactic on him in a very overt manner over and over for years, he's gonna start resisting it. And when it's your royal father resisting your manipulation tactic, well, he has all the cards.While Punching Viserys is not a politically wise reaction to finding out that Viserys killed Aemma. There is a politically wise move though and it's called Guilt Tripping.
Never let Viserys sleep and live peacefully again knowing that he killed Aemma. Squeeze him for all that is his worth. Strengthen our position and our heir with a A permanent Small Council seat for Prince of Dragonstone. Threaten him to stop trying for kid so Viserys don't kill another wife (and we don't have a Prince to compete for but that is only for us.)
I was and have always been in Squeeze Viserys Dry caucus. Many don't want to risk Viserys relation as it weaken our position. Squeezing Viserys instead turn this personal relation strain into effectively unrestricted power for The Heir.
I don't think this would actually work out, because while Viserys is absolutely vulnerable to being manipulated and squeezed by family members (e.g. Daemon), he's not gullible. And if someone keeps using the same manipulation tactic on him in a very overt manner over and over for years, he's gonna start resisting it. And when it's your royal father resisting your manipulation tactic, well, he has all the cards.
Nope. He was told "To sacrifice one… or to lose them both." And the "Behind the Episode" thing confirms that she was going to die either way. Barring a (literal?) miracle, there was no way for her to survive.I understood it as an either or type of thing, if she would have died anyways I don't think it would have had the same impact. He chose the possibility of his long awaited male heir over his beloved wife, only for said son to barely live a day. Basically he sacrificed his wife for a son only to loses them both in the end.
I think it's also fair to blame him for lying to Aemma right before they do it. You mentioned the milk of the poppy but at least the way the scene is acted, she definitely seems cognizant enough that it's immoral both to make that decision without her and not to tell her about it. That's plenty for him to feel guilty about, although I don't know that it's sort of thing that would get Rhaenyra mad at him when hearing an abbreviated description of it after the fact. If she could see the scene from the show, that might be different.As such, I, personally, do not think Viserys's decision was wrong. He was acting within the information he was given. I'm honestly more leery of Mellos and the midwives(was there really nothing they could do to make it less painful, or at the barest minimum, ensure she has a more peaceful death before the effective torture?). I do blame Viserys for creating the situation in the first place, however.
She wasn't even told what's going on. She just went from a normal birthing experience (which is to say, absofuckinglutely miserable but with a light at the end of the tunnel) to being murdered with zero explanation. That's a horrific way to die and I 100% blame Viserys for it, even if there was actually no way to save her or make it less painful. She didn't even get to know what she was dying for, or why.Nope. He was told "To sacrifice one… or to lose them both." And the "Behind the Episode" thing confirms that she was going to die either way. Barring a (literal?) miracle, there was no way for her to survive.
He was also told he needed to make the decision right now, or it'd be too late. "We must either act now or leave it with the gods."
Now, of course, many have pointed out that she should have been given the choice, but I'm not sure even IRL she would be of sound enough mind to give informed consent due to drugs: "We've given her as much milk of the poppy as we can without risking the child."
If (and only if) such a case, as her husband, Viserys would indeed be a valid surrogate decision maker under some systems. And, of course, in-universe, such a thing really wouldn't matter, as it's the husbands/fathers decision, no matter what the wife wants.
As such, I, personally, do not think Viserys's decision was wrong. He was acting within the information he was given. I'm honestly more leery of Mellos and the midwives(was there really nothing they could do to make it less painful, or at the barest minimum, ensure she has a more peaceful death before the effective torture?). I do blame Viserys for creating the situation in the first place, however.
I'm pretty certain that the Iron Throne does not actually have any magical ability to cut people who are "unworthy"There is supposedly some vauge possibility that the iron throne has some magic. Of course it could just be leprosy and the cut from the iron throne was just a coincidence.
With regards to Aemma, please remember that the medical advice given was "lose them both or just her". It was, given the information he was given, the correct choice under Westerosi norms and some, though not all, modern ethical/moral frameworks.
Nope. He was told "To sacrifice one… or to lose them both." And the "Behind the Episode" thing confirms that she was going to die either way. Barring a (literal?) miracle, there was no way for her to survive.
This can also be read that IC Aemma possible survival is put out of consideration entirely in favor Baelon's. The episode put biased disregard as major theme that together with these options frame Mellos presentation as false choice born of this disregard. It also make twisted sense in this reading that Aemma consent was not asked at all as one of the only person that surely will ask about her own chance even if she agree. In contrast the only one to establish Aemma impossible survival were OOC interview that imo ring dissonance with the IC material.Mellos said:To sacrifice one... or to lose them both. There is a chance that we can save the child. A technique is taught at the Citadel, which involves cutting directly into the womb to free the infant. But the resulting blood loss--
As a whole the episode show those who speak about Aemma's well-being before her death were only Rhaenyra and Aemma herself. Viserys did not even discuss Aemma's well-being in private with Aemma when it was what most Aemma talked about. Viserys mostly speak about Baelon. Most everyone, including Mellos, rarely speak about Aemma and even in those rare occasion only in relation to Baelon. Rhaenyra spoke directly about the situation Aemma was in.
Rhaenyra observation still echo along with Mellos's option on that scene. I put much on Viserys choice, after two miscarriage and two stillbirths, after a dead baby and a living daughter, to still pursue a son at all cost. So when Mellos presented the may be incomplete and false choice, he choose as he had chosen all along.Rhaenyra to Aemma said:Well, here you are, surrounded by attendants, all focused on the babe. Someone has to attend to you.
The Drug argument saying she can not consent is also not really fit. On the episode from 35:54 to 37:26 consist mainly of Viserys talking to Aemma and Aemma expressing her confusion and slowly realizing that something is very wrong. On 37:08 Aemma sees the Knife. Aemma realize her beloved husband is killing her and now she plead for her life. Screaming "No!" repeatedly. Aemma can understand her situation and withdraw her consent.Now, of course, many have pointed out that she should have been given the choice, but I'm not sure even IRL she would be of sound enough mind to give informed consent due to drugs: "We've given her as much milk of the poppy as we can without risking the child."
While I like the argument both for and against magical throne for Aerys II specifically it did cut him repeatedly he was called King Scab for his numerous wounds in the end.Because if the throne is magic and cuts "unworthy" people then where the hell was it when Arys was sitting on it? Or Joffrey?
The problem with the interpretation that it is impossible for Aemma to survive is it ring dissonance with the whole episode that put biased disregard as a theme. Especially contrasting with Rhaenyra earlier comment about Aemma care that the priority is the baby not Aemma.
The Drug argument saying she can not consent is also not really fit. On the episode from 35:54 to 37:26 consist mainly of Viserys talking to Aemma and Aemma expressing her confusion and slowly realizing that something is very wrong. On 37:08 Aemma sees the Knife. Aemma realize her beloved husband is killing her and now she plead for her life. Screaming "No!" repeatedly. Aemma can understand her situation and withdraw her consent.
While I like the argument both for and against magical throne for Aerys II specifically it did cut him repeatedly he was called King Scab for his numerous wounds in the end.