- Location
- Voidbetweenstars
Luke got his ass saved.
Ankian got his ass saved.
Why cant Rey get her ass saved?
Luke got his ass saved.
Well, this is a lightsaber we're talking about. You know, magic sword, feels like an extension of your body if you use it long enough.It's something entirely different to have that rage, pull out a pistol, thumb the safety off, point it at a sleeping child, and then and ONLY then do you realize "Whoa wait a second I've messed up need to dial this back a few million notches."
It's one thing to have that red hot flash of rage moment.
It's something entirely different to have that rage, pull out a pistol, thumb the safety off, point it at a sleeping child, and then and ONLY then do you realize "Whoa wait a second I've messed up need to dial this back a few million notches."
Anyone is redeemable. The problem isn't that Ben is beyond redemption, it's that he actively refuses to be redeemed. You cannot save someone who does not want to be saved.And yet if they further enforced that point of view, people would still defend him and say he's redeemable
As I said, the problem is that to use the Force properly you need to trust your instincts, and the Skywalker instincts just so happen to be objectively terrible.Besides which, overreacting to a painful vision of the future and dooming the galaxy is a Skywalker tradition. Anakin did it in RotS and Luke did it in Empire
Luke got his ass saved.
Ankian got his ass saved.
Why cant Rey get her ass saved?
I guess being free'd from slavery doesn't count?
You do know that he got rescued near the start of the movie from the tuskan raiders right?Luke got his ass saved by having someone cover him in a fight.
Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith
...So I assume we're not counting The Clone Wars tv series here?
Hey! Hey. Look, let's be fair to Ben. We don't want to mischaracterize him.Look, Kylo Ren is a school shooter. That fact needs to be the foundation of understanding him.
Did he do either though, from the flashback it looks more like he just collapsed the temple and that was what killed everyoneHey! Hey. Look, let's be fair to Ben. We don't want to mischaracterize him.
He is a school stabber.
So basically this -Did he do either though, from the flashback it looks more like he just collapsed the temple and that was what killed everyone
Their is no way he'd kill everyone in a good sized building with it.Pretty much, he wakes up him and Luke clash sabers and then Ben Force pushes and everything goes flying
The rebellion only had 6 bombers and six bomber crews.
The First Order had more than one dreadnought.
So, while yes, on paper that's absolutely a favorable trade for the Resistance, in reality if they keep doing that they will all be dead before they defeat the First Order. Fighting a war of attrition is a bad plan for them, even if they fight it really, really well.
Poe refers to "those things" being "fleet killers" in plural. Maybe there aren't many, but that certainly suggests more than one.Wasn´t the Fulminatrix still one of the kind? I got that impression from the BFII DLC.
Poe refers to "those things" being "fleet killers" in plural. Maybe there aren't many, but that certainly suggests more than one.
Considering they had to pursue the resistance with a repair ship (this is my understanding from comments in various threads, if I am wrong then I withdraw my complaint) and said ship couldn't do more than tickle the shields at range maybe they should have brought one of the others in?Poe refers to "those things" being "fleet killers" in plural. Maybe there aren't many, but that certainly suggests more than one.
I assumed the rest of their fleet was dealing with subjugating other parts of the galaxy.Considering they had to pursue the resistance with a repair ship (this is my understanding from comments in various threads, if I am wrong then I withdraw my complaint) and said ship couldn't do more than tickle the shields at range maybe they should have brought one of the others in?
Perhaps I misunderstood you. So many people have tried to wave off legitimate criticisms of the new movies by saying "It's just a fantasy! You shouldn't think too much about it!" As if the genre was any excuse for bad plotting.
So just to be clear. You are talking about scientific explanations for things, right? In that case, I agree with you. They don't have to adhere to actual science, so long as they follow their own internal logic.
It would certainly be an interesting debate.
So, are you suggesting that we shouldn't hold fantasy settings to obey our understanding of the universe and how it operates?
I have this feeling every time I see someone complain about the Dark Saber from Clone Wars/Rebels being unrealistic.Bingo.
Yes, because it doesn't work nor does it have to work that way. If you want to nerd out that hard be my guest, but I will look on with nothing but ridicule and contempt if it's for anything other than laughs.