You have to put your preferred plan in your vote.
Ah, ninjad.
Last edited:
[X] The Cooperative Party
-[X] Plan Cooperativism is Local Control Plus Electrification of the Whole Country
--[X] Organize local planning hubs as equal partners to the republic wide planning commission, tasked with short loop answers to local demand.
--[X] Invest in a country wide electrification drive, with the ultimate goal to reach every community in time.
--[X] Send human and financial assistance to Spain and Italy to help them build up their worker and farmer owned economies.
--[X] Connect with underground rebellious elements in our imperial league neighbours to organize revolutionary defeatist networks ready to sabotage the empires' war effort when liberation comes for them.
--[X] Set up non-territorial councils and communication hubs so that people of particular languages and culture groups can discuss matters relevant to them as such.
--[X] Compulsory Education shall include a course including outdoors survival, navigation and firearm operation.
Personally, I would put the cultural councils a bit higher than that, but I don't have any particular objection. Well, except for the last plank, but I doubt it's going to be enacted either way.
...Also, is this just me overthinking this or has the Vanguardist tend to co-opt anarchists' planks and make a centralist version out of it? I mean, they did their own version of durable goods libraries back in 1885 and said that it could be centrally operate. And this time they also put their own version of electrification with a centralist specification and international technical cooperation program with our allies. I mean, I am not exactly opposed to it since those are good policies, and people do have the same ideas all the time, so it's not really that big of a deal.
now you're just using 'Paternalistic' as a dog-whistle. Quite frankly, there WILL be people who abuse their meds. Not everyone is going to have the proper impulse control to use medication, in particular younger individuals. Or are you that willing to consign our teenagers and young adults to that kind of addiction?
Responding to "that's paternalist" with "but won't someone think of the children" doesn't exactly make outside observers think you aren't being paternalist.
Responding to "that's paternalist" with "but won't someone think of the children" doesn't exactly make outside observers think you aren't being paternalist.
"Lets not give everyone free coke" might be considered a paternalistic statement by some, that doesn't mean its unsound.
No? That's just mixing game mechanisms up with attitudes about how real things work. Medical systems, in this case.If we wanted to be finicky, everyone in this thread is paternalistic in some fashion. We are after all deciding what's 'Best' for Germany and it's people, in all of our own fashions.
Insufficient Content Promotion by SV
People are generally able to see to their own needs if they aren't under financial pressure, and if they fall into addiction, the solution isn't pushing them into illegality where they can be exploited, it's to also offer free care for that. Opioid addiction is driven more by profit seeking drug traffic and poor prescription practices than customer preference, the latter having no reason to prefer more addictive options if they're available.
We should be very careful about any legal restriction we put on accessing healthcare. Being forced to jump through bureaucratic hoops to get the care you know you already need is an extremely negative result for the patient, in addition to adding load on our healthcare bureaucracy. Instead we should invest in good education on the topic and assistance for addiction issues.
How would a prescription from a doctor be a terrible legal restriction? Quite frankly, What we should build up to is an an efficient, large and modern medical system, where people can get serviced quickly by a physician and assigned a prescription. No need for ANY risk of addiction. The large amount of doctors would allows us to assign everyone the bi-yearly appointements the Communists want. As for dealing with addicts, the best options we have for that is ALWAYS prevention, so proper prescriptions from doctors, lessons in class etc. What I'm seeing from the communist plan is just people trying to jump the gun on all these shiny new innovations and reforms when logistically, it'd be an absolute mess. Non-prescription drugs are a whole other story, I find. Those, I'd agree with freely supplying them without any hassle. Besides, people will always use non-prescription drugs more than prescription ones that have a chance of causing addiction or overdoses, so a doctor's appointment for the latter seems like a non-issue.
How would a prescription from a doctor be a terrible legal restriction? Quite frankly, What we should build up to is an an efficient, large and modern medical system, where people can get serviced quickly by a physician and assigned a prescription. No need for ANY risk of addiction. The large amount of doctors would allows us to assign everyone the bi-yearly appointements the Communists want. As for dealing with addicts, the best options we have for that is ALWAYS prevention, so proper prescriptions from doctors, lessons in class etc. What I'm seeing from the communist plan is just people trying to jump the gun on all these shiny new innovations and reforms when logistically, it'd be an absolute mess. Non-prescription drugs are a whole other story, I find. Those, I'd agree with freely supplying them without any hassle. Besides, people will always use non-prescription drugs more than prescription ones that have a chance of causing addiction or overdoses, so a doctor's appointment for the latter seems like a non-issue.
In this era doctors think that recreational cocaine use is healthy. They are still putting chloroform in the cough medicine. Requiring Rx for meds won't really slow down addiction rates.
In this era doctors think that recreational cocaine use is healthy. They are still putting chloroform in the cough medicine. Requiring Rx for meds won't really slow down addiction rates.
I'm trans, I have personal experience of "oh just get a prescription" as sufficient bureaucracy for disingenuous people to fuck you over. I also know there's some history of doctors not recognizing pain in minority patients and thus not prescribing enough.
I
We have a semi-planned economy, I have no doubt there'll be some control of our more potent healthcare supplies. But I don't think panicking about an opioid crisis is a reasonable reaction to the idea people might request what they need directly when they have the knowledge to make that decision. This isn't the kind of setup that causes crisis anyway. Countries with prescription systems have had such crises because it's often over prescription and lack of alternatives that causes it, not customers specifically seeking the addictive opioids.
We should seek to empower our people as much as possible to make intelligent decisions, even if some control based on the requisition system is reasonable for the most dangerous products.
People are generally able to see to their own needs if they aren't under financial pressure, and if they fall into addiction, the solution isn't pushing them into illegality where they can be exploited, it's to also offer free care for that. Opioid addiction is driven more by profit seeking drug traffic and poor prescription practices than customer preference, the latter having no reason to prefer more addictive options if they're available.
We should be very careful about any legal restriction we put on accessing healthcare. Being forced to jump through bureaucratic hoops to get the care you know you already need is an extremely negative result for the patient, in addition to adding load on our healthcare bureaucracy. Instead we should invest in good education on the topic and assistance for addiction issues.
Those happening in Germany as it is seems unlikely, to say the least. And if they do, I'm sure we'll crack down on It.