- Location
- Canada
[x] Plan Guardian
No you are not
If I'd tried to imply you expected to deal with orks in one turn, then yes. But hoping? For me that quotes pretty clearly states it.Given that I was denying "[hoping] to deal with orks in one turn without Mag 3 ritual," you are misinterpreting my words to an extent that makes me you're actively cherrypicking to mine for quotes that discredit.
Actually no. At least for me - it is very much relevant. That mean you, maybe, hoped to deal with orks in two turns, and then get that research on third, because we can do 1000 slannpower researches in one turn, unlike 2500.Firstly, I believe at the time that I was under the delusion that basic soul research cost 1000 points, but that's irrelevant.
So? I didn't state you (or anyone else) hoped to kill every single ork in one turn.More to the point, I'm envisioning breaking, not exterminating the ork force. That is to say, reducing them to a threat level that can be contained without full maximum-effort pressure from our entire civilization.
Exactly. Do I need to bring here a dictionaries for word "hope" meaning? Here you confirmed you hoped that things might go well enough to allow us dedicate more than a half (since you thinked we need 1000) of our slannspower for something not related to war with orks.The word 'maybe' should reasonably be interpreted as 'optimistically we may be in a position to complete basic soul research and start work on a counter-Ayacmanik project if fighting the orks goes well, or not if it goes poorly.'
Firstly, I interpreted it almost exactly as you said here: "let's not do the stone NOW, hopefully we may be able to do it next turn".My second quote is "[the stone] Next turn. Too big a project to tackle without significantly impairing our ability to fight the orks." Firstly, this should be interpreted in the context of me saying "let's not do the stone NOW, we may be able to do it next turn. Secondly, we could.
You mean significantly impair our ability to fight the orks?No, I'm serious. Here's how I'd do it. Scrap the geomantic rituals and much of the "control kaiju" slannpower budget,
I think you're overthinking it. The two factions are fairly close to evenly matched; I'm not worried about the action being wasted, realistically. Remember that in the later part of Turn 10, Urdgob was making gains at Gardakka's expense. Things could still turn around for him if he rolls well, and even if he rolls poorly, he won't necessarily lose fast.For all planmakers, who use "Behead the Beast" (assassination)! Gardakka will have about a five years to beat Urdgob before ritual will strike. There's chance that one of them will kill the other. Don't sure how likely that, but there we have a chance of wasting action... Maybe you should consider to add a note "If that person dies, assassinate one or more of possible successors", or something like that (I don't think we can use preparation for assassination to, say, build a new city). @Xantalos, is that valid addition?
Here are the probable scenarios I foresee as likely developments of the current state of affairs:I think that one is closest to my ideal right now. Might switch later, either for "Deffkloud" or against it, depend on how Simon will argue about his idea of assassinating one Warboss, but not both. Right now I'm not convinced we should do this.
Even if Gardakka wouldn't kill Urdgob before us (as I said above, he'll have about a five years to do so), he'd be, likely, in pretty bad position. And so, I'd prefer two severely crippled hordes than one not so much.
Are you SERIOUSLY going to come in here busting my balls because a month ago in real life I expressed HOPE that the war would be over quickly?To @Simon_Jester, about the hopes and expectations:
If I'd tried to imply you expected to deal with orks in one turn, then yes. But hoping? For me that quotes pretty clearly states it.
Actually no. At least for me - it is very much relevant. That mean you, maybe, hoped to deal with orks in two turns, and then get that research on third, because we can do 1000 slannpower researches in one turn, unlike 2500.
So? I didn't state you (or anyone else) hoped to kill every single ork in one turn.
"Deal with", at least as I use it usually, is "solve that problem". In that case, I implied "cripple the orks enough so they wouldn't be a threat for us". Cleaning afterward would be requred after Mag 3 ritual as well.
Exactly. Do I need to bring here a dictionaries for word "hope" meaning? Here you confirmed you hoped that things might go well enough to allow us dedicate more than a half (since you thinked we need 1000) of our slannspower for something not related to war with orks.
Firstly, I interpreted it almost exactly as you said here: "let's not do the stone NOW, hopefully we may be able to do it next turn".
Secondly, we could've done it on the last turn. But "Too big a project to tackle without significantly impairing our ability to fight the orks". Implies that "next turn maybe (i.e. "hopefully") that will not be the issue".
That's possible indeed. But don't forget - both "Guardian" and "Counterattack" have assasinations ready for both warbossess, and that raise chances of action loss considerably.
I think that raise the chance that both Bosses will get bored of that and go to personally krump each other.
You can add "If Gardakka will kill Urdgob before our assassins, reassign them on killing Gardakka's Underbosses" or something like that.if Gardakka does kill Urdgob or take over his faction, and becomes the warboss of all the orks, we'll be wanting to take down Gardakka in single combat with one of our saurus oldbloods, not assassinate him.
As I said above, I think there also "They both get bored of that shit and go for the duel". Most unfortunate scenario for us, because means less casualties among the orks. But not really something we can do about it... Only if we kill both of them around the start of the turn, but I don't sure if it even possible - assassination need time to be planned and prepared.Here are the probable scenarios I foresee as likely developments of the current state of affairs:
???Are you SERIOUSLY going to come in here busting my balls because a month ago in real life I expressed HOPE that the war would be over quickly?
What is the point of all this?
You saidI indeed think everyone who hoped to deal with orks in one turn without Mag 3 ritual been... Let's say "unreasonable optimistic" to not violate rules.
I bring a couple of quotes to show you, that there indeed been people who hoped for it (and I solemnly swear I didn't search for your posts on purpose, if you suspect it). And, while I'm on it, I apologize that misread that post and didn't notice "expect" instead of "hoped" until now.
I mean... you're not too far off in spirit.Wow, empathy and compassion literally kills DE. I swear building an halo ring sized empathy devices would literally kill 40k
Orks get bored when they have no fighting to do. Urdgob is surrounded by enemies on all sides, Gardakka is surrounded by enemies on three sides out of four.I think that raise the chance that both Bosses will get bored of that and go to personally krump each other.
If Gardakka kills Urdgob, Urdgob's underbosses will flip to serve him. Killing them will serve no real purpose on a strategic level. To get anything useful out of the action we'd have to flip the skinks to killing Gardakka in that scenario, and that is probably too opportunistic for @Xantalos to allow. After all, each of these assassination attacks takes time and prep work to set up; you can't exactly reroute them on the fly.You can add "If Gardakka will kill Urdgob before our assassins, reassign them on killing Gardakka's Underbosses" or something like that.
Whatever problems Gardakka and Urdgob have, boredom is not one of them.As I said above, I think there also "They both get bored of that shit and go for the duel". Most unfortunate scenario for us, because means less casualties among the orks.