Yzarc
The Spark of Madness
Strongly disagree with this, as the charm allows to detect the mood of the "person" and quite frankly? Lie detection is a separate charm entirely.
Strongly disagree with this, as the charm allows to detect the mood of the "person" and quite frankly? Lie detection is a separate charm entirely.
The charm says, and I quote:Do you have a quote for that?
I mean, it's obviously very difficult to soak.
Armor shouldn't work at all and most creatures can't soak aggravated anyway. Mundane people will die on a single success and most supernatural beings will also suffer.
But say a Vamp with Fortitude should propably get his roll?
That's pretty important, since many beings in WoD don't get extra-health at all (unlike Molly), so every damage level taken really matters a lot.
Sinner Boiling Stare said:Spend a turn in concentration, spend 1 Essence, and roll Willpower against a difficulty of the targets(Stamina + 2)
The target suffers one level of aggravated damage for each success rolled as they cook from the inside out. Mortals are instantly killed outright even if a single success is tolled.
Denarians are mortal. Like, explicitly mortal even.It's almost too bad that we mostly won't get to abuse that mortal busting feature since our enemies are primarily supernatural.
The Hunger is something internal. The denarian is external. A coin bearer can put down the coin, and walk away, with no negative consequences to their health, mind or soul. This is evidence that they don't actually modify their hosts, acting as, essentially, "power armor". Up to you, of course.They are mortal as a base, but they have one of the Fallen in residence. If the petty demonic Hunger of the White Court makes you not count as human one of the Fallen certainly counts. Also wizards have enough magic in them natively not to count as 'mortal'. when WoD says mortal what they mostly mean is 'does not feature in a splat'.
That appears to be inaccurate.This is a bit uncharitable to the Sight and too charitable to the HellScry chakra. The text of the charm is:
So, at the basis it's CoD detector (doesn't detect non-CoDs, so wont' detect summer and many wyld fae, angels, changelings, wizards and a number of other supernatural beings). The additional functionality dependent on further Occult + Perception rolls allows one to monitor the anima (I am guessing aura, since most beings don't have an anima) of people around you. The charitable interpretation is that this can be used on anyone in your presence. The uncharitable one (based on "furthermore" and "some clues about their nature") means that we can only see auras of CoDs. Nothing is said about lie detection - that would be based on interpreting auras we see. All this costs 1 essence to activate at a time.
Sight also gives aura sight, and doesn't cost essence. The functionality is, essentially, the same (the Sight, however, works on non-CoDs). The difference might be in how well one can shield oneself from the Sight and Hellscry Chakra.
Wizards base a great deal of their perceptions of people on the soul gaze. In theory, when you look into another being you see into the core of them– their true nature. But it seems to me from the evidence we have so far that this is not always totally accurate. When Harry gazed into Molly, he saw numerous potential outcomes, but judged that she was at the core worthy of his help and support. We know he soul gazed Ebeneezer, and yet he was surprised to find out he was Blackstaff. If the soul gaze is so open to interpretation, can it actually cause a wizard to believe an untruth? Is a soul gaze a truly accurate way to determine the nature of a person?
What it shows you is /true/. But it isn't necessarily /all/.
For instance, a 'gaze could show you that a man was self-disciplined, sober, highly organized, dedicated to his principles, and that he loved dogs, and all of that would be /true/. But it /doesn't/ tell you /everything/ about Adolf Hitler.
Granted, a soulgaze of Hitler would probably have given off a big vibe of either "crazy" or "ruthless" too. They tend to give you a pretty good core sample of the individual in question. However, every wizard gets things a little bit differently than any other, in terms of how the soulgaze is perceived. Not every wizard sees things in symbols and allegory, the way Harry does. There's a whole spectrum of different "filters," I suppose, of how the basic natures of others are perceived.
As for misinterpreting what they perceive, or putting their own preconceptions on their interpretations? Please. EVERYONE does that, wizard or not. It's part of being human.
Jim
Quote from: Grise on November 02, 2006, 08:57:16 PM
In reply to the question of whether a soul can change over time, my humble opinion lays thusly:
Since your soul is the essential you, anything that truly touches you will change your soul. I know that having to watch a five year old die over a period of months while I and the rest of my pedi ICU did everything we could to save him changed me. I know that meeting and falling in love (yes, and finally marrying her!) with my Lady and Wife changed me. And I know that there are more changes down the road.
I an not the person I was at twenty. Nor am I yet the pperson I will be at sixty if I should get that far. Life is an ongoing process, after all.
Ah, but is it a process of pressure and change, or is it a process of polish and refinement? One could argue that the events that "changed" you in actuality only revealed a truer facet of your soul than had previously been perceiveable–that those events only changed you inasmuch as a rough diamond is changed by a master jeweler's tools. The diamond doesn't become an emerald–it just becomes a more beautiful and quinessential diamond.
(Just Devil's Advocating here, for the most part, and throwing that thought out.)
In any case, it may just be possible for a person to change enough for a soulgaze to reveal something else–but it would have to be an utterly incredible kind of change. Something along the lines of the billionaire executive who, after a near-death experience, gives all his worldly goods to charity, leaves home in his pajamas, and takes up a life of underwater basket-weaving and meditation. And even that seems a little mild to me, thinking of it.
Anyway, it'd take a truly epic change of heart and mind–to the point where you would practically *be* a whole different person, and not just a person who happens to be you with a lot more life experience to inform his outlook. (And, in fact, there's all sorts of theories about people who this happens to after a near-death experience, regarding "walk-in" souls who come and inhabit a person near death, changing them and becoming a kind of inner Yoda to the "native" soul.)
All of the above, of course, is more or less a discussion of angels dancing on the heads of pins, but it's fun.
Jim
If Charity has some power when she met Michael. How did she avoid looking him in the eye and starting a soulgaze? I have to assume it never happened since he doesn't know about her abilities. I assume it took years for her abilities to fade away and from what I read, it sounds like they were a couple fairly soon after he rescued her.
One answer may be that she wasn't strong enough to initiate a soulgaze. That raises the question, how strong do you have to be. The question could be asked of Molly too. When did or when will her ability to start one come on?
You got to have some serious magical chops before a soulgaze is an issue–and yes, it's one of the markers that the Council uses to see if you make the cut, though it's far from the only one. There are folks running around who can do it who aren't on the Council, but not many of them.
Charity was small potatoes in the magic department, for a number of reasons. It was never an issue with her.
Jim
The third sight reveals truths about people and places that aren't evident to the naked eye. Are the specific images that are seen intrinsic to the subject, or is there a measure of personal metaphor and interpretation on the part of the viewer? In other words… Let's say that Wizard A grew up in America, and may consider the embodiment of evil to be a devil-like figure. Wizard B is from India, and might instead associate evil with a rakshasa. They each view a subject with their third sight. The subject is a vile and malicious person. Would this be revealed to them both in the same way, or would what each one sees be influenced by his own cultural background?
Not only would the Western-raised wizard and Eastern-raised wizard perceive things according to the cultural biases and subjective experiences, they might not even perceive them with the same /senses/.
The Third Sight is different for everyone, subjective, and inherently slanted towards ones own experiences and background. So while two wizards might look on some totally-gone, bloodthirsty warlock and see a bloodthirsty warlock, they might see it in very different ways.
Maybe Harry looks on him and sees some Hannibal-Lectery figure crouched on the floor grinning and soaked in blood. But maybe Ancient Mai looks on him and sees a bare, twisted white tree in the center of an unbroken field of white snow, representative of the individual's loss of spirit and humanity. And maybe Rodriguez looks at him and hears some kind of hideous music that accompanies the individual and makes the hair on the back of Carlos' neck stand up. Maybe Klaus the Toymaker looks at them and sees that his head is covered in cracks and flaws, and that underneath the parts where the flesh looks chipped away, something rotten and horrible is underneath. Maybe Listens-to-Wind looks on the warlock and smells something rotted and vile.
It's way different for each wizard, and it's why even though soulgazes and third sight can be used as evidence in, for example, warlock trials, there is also room for argument and interpretation–that's how Ebenezar defended Dresden, for example. He claimed that he Saw more than just "murdering warlock."
Plus, it isn't flawless. I mean, if a wizard looks at someone who has just suffered some kind of horrible physical or emotional injury, he gets a much different picture of that person than if he sees them a week sooner, or a year later. If a wizard looks on someone who is in a towering rage at the moment, it's going to have an effect on what is Seen. Maybe not an enormous effect, true, but at times even a little bit of difference in shading can change the overall picture. Oh, plus if the /Wizard/ is in a radically altered state of mind, it can shade things differently, too.
Ultimately, the Sight is something that is best relied upon for making one's own decisions, for supporting one's intuitions and observations–as long as one remembers that while it is always true, it isn't always completely correct. Circumstance can, at tmes, effect what is Seen.
Jim
Perfect lie detection is another charm.Strongly disagree with this, as the charm allows to detect the mood of the "person" and quite frankly? Lie detection is a separate charm entirely.
Even Mages are not mortal in the sense of counting as such for charms and disciplines.The Hunger is something internal. The denarian is external. A coin bearer can put down the coin, and walk away, with no negative consequences to their health, mind or soul. This is evidence that they don't actually modify their hosts, acting as, essentially, "power armor". Up to you, of course.
That's about what I expected, but I would point out that white vamps are permanently changed by their demon partner fusing with their souls and denarians are kept as mortal as possible so that they can provide maximum free will shenanigans for their partner. They can put the coin down and walk off to be a regular muggle.They are mortal as a base, but they have one of the Fallen in residence. If the petty demonic Hunger of the White Court makes you not count as human one of the Fallen certainly counts. Also wizards have enough magic in them natively not to count as 'mortal'. when WoD says mortal what they mostly mean is 'does not feature in a splat'.
The Hunger is something internal. The denarian is external. A coin bearer can put down the coin, and walk away, with no negative consequences to their health, mind or soul. This is evidence that they don't actually modify their hosts, acting as, essentially, "power armor". Up to you, of course.
The fluff says that she attunes her inner eye to "spiritual desolation" and gains the ability "to detect potential servants or rivals". That's pretty explicit in how this is about CoDs, not supernatural in general.That appears to be inaccurate.
The fluff explicitly says it weighs the souls of those it meets, not just CoDs, and the aura table we're referred to looks at everything from wizards to fae.
Being able to kill them on sight could make for an interesting plot line as we deal with them malding over the bullshit and the knights' duty to save them if they can, but we'd probably just fry as many as we could reach and start teething on the coins like the baby primordial Molly is.
A coin bearer is non-mortal enough for their strikes to count as damaging to a Titan.The Hunger is something internal. The denarian is external. A coin bearer can put down the coin, and walk away, with no negative consequences to their health, mind or soul. This is evidence that they don't actually modify their hosts, acting as, essentially, "power armor". Up to you, of course.
Potential servants and rivals are not restricted to CoDs.The fluff says that she attunes her inner eye to "spiritual desolation" and gains the ability "to detect potential servants or rivals". That's pretty explicit in how this is about CoDs, not supernatural in general.
Which is not actually an issue.We couldn't actually kill them on sight though. They would have to actually slight us somehow. Which would actually be really interesting if their fallen angel recognizes that. I am imagining a bunch of denarians carefully avoiding slighting us.
For most enemies that would likely work, but fallen angels are amazingly skilled at toeing the line.Which is not actually an issue.
You're operating in my nation, on my world, without my permission. How dare you.
As a class, they kept us from spending as much time with our father as we could have. The Denarians were always forcing Michael to travel for work.We couldn't actually kill them on sight though. They would have to actually slight us somehow. Which would actually be really interesting if their fallen angel recognizes that. I am imagining a bunch of denarians carefully avoiding slighting us.
You existence offends me, die, is all the reason an Exalted needs.For most enemies that would likely work, but fallen angels are amazingly skilled at toeing the line.
For my part I'd say it'd make sense to make it free to activate, but require increasingly difficult rolls and larger temp will power expense to keep using on pain of side effects depending on what you're looking at and how long it's up.And we dont know if it costs Essence or Willpower to activate in this quest; it did take effort to close in the books iirc.
Yeah, but I wouldn't call that a hugely useful synergy. They just need to personally offend Molly for SBS to work, even if it's something petty. Fighting us on something we care about almost certainly counts.If someone is the target of our hate from Simmering Sinner Resentment (•) (3XP) then I expect that we can consider the target to have auto-slighted us with their existence for Sinner-Boiling Stare.
We couldn't actually kill them on sight though. They would have to actually slight us somehow. Which would actually be really interesting if their fallen angel recognizes that. I am imagining a bunch of denarians carefully avoiding slighting us.
If cutting the infernal off in traffic counts I feel pretty comfortable asserting that almost anything we find a Denarian doing would.sinner-Boiling stare (•••)
Concentrating her ire upon one she feels has
wronged her, the Infernal causes all of the liquids in the target's body to come to a boil.
System: Spend a turn in concentration, spend 1 Essence, and roll Willpower against a difficulty of the target's (Stamina + 2). The target must be within the Exalt's line of sight, and must be someone that the Infernal feels has wronged her in some way, be it grand or petty; even such a minor offense as cutting the Ex- alt off in traffic or leaving her hanging on a high-five is sufficient. The target suffers one level of aggravated damage for each success rolled as they cook from the inside out; mortals are instantly killed outright if even a single success is rolled.
IF we roll enough sux we can detect lies is not a valid argument as we can detect lies if we roll enough sux even without that charm.This isnt perfect, but its close, especially in combination with All Things Betray. Thats why I call it a knockoff.
We couldn't actually kill them on sight though. They would have to actually slight us somehow.
OK, looks like we are changing the XP system. Next up Lydia would like to talk to you.
The change is easy enough to explain in-story. Our exaltation is explicitly running on emergency power saving mode. You could easily say that it finished rebooting / reconfiguring.*So, did you suddenly feel as if the laws of physics changed or is it just me?*