By Koba's beard, that is a HUGE margin of error. Losing one-third of our space budget now (down to 80) is totally fine. Losing three-fifths (down to 48) would be CATASTROPHIC. Given my preference to play it safe, and that it will probably be over an IRL year before the space race is done, I say LET'S ROCK.Speaking of budget cuts, after asking Blackstar in Discord, Voz estimates that canceling the moonshot now will result in our budget going a third to three-fifths down. And considering we just had a lot of delegates with a "spend money on the workers" agenda coming in and Voz underestimates their political influence, I think the cut will be at least a half, maybe as much as 75%.
It heavily depends on what theoretical basis and set of definitions you use for communists vs noncommunists. In the Leninist and Marxist-Leninist sense, along with "Dengist" follow ons the primary way to build communism is to develop material conditions and productive forces to a point such that a communist transition is viable. Further, the domination by the vanguard is seen as an element of worker control of the state economic organs rather than the formation of a theoretical new elite in all of the above, the Vanguard is, at least in theory, meant to be representative of the workers and the inherently progressive force building communism. This then makes all of the various party-run and state-owned industries you have perfectly fine even if they run according to a market mechanism as industry is still under the guiding hand of the party and thus the workers.Expanding childcare will also free up huge amounts of women to work outside of the home
the expansion of industrial factory farming will be a disaster in just about every area
water pollution, soil pollution, creation of new diseases, destroying local ecosystems, the destruction of rural towns
see rob wallace's seminal "big farms make big flu"
and then the proletariatnization of the rurals isn't a positive development in general
self abolition of the proletariat after all is part of the communist movement
but this quest does a great job of showing how the state capitalism that gets passed off as "socialism" is not socialism or communism at a
and that no politicians in the USSR are communists
they're all just capitalist developmentalists
Speaking of budget cuts, after asking Blackstar in Discord, Voz estimates that canceling the moonshot now will result in our budget going a third to three-fifths down. And considering we just had a lot of delegates with a "spend money on the workers" agenda coming in and Voz underestimates their political influence, I think the cut will be at least a half, maybe as much as 75%.
[]Cancel It: The designers have themselves discredited practically every approach towards the moon, doing much of the challenging political work independent of any prodding. Ensuring that the Supreme Soviet brings them all into interviews and determines the correct truth of the matter would be a trivial task. The space program will take a budget cut and the goal of the moon will be surrendered for a time, at least until the Americans do something or technology sufficiently improves.
In the closest thing to a compromise design, Chelomei and his OKB have made a proposal to eliminate the riskiest part of the landing itself by bringing along a far heavier lander to the moon on a hypergolic transfer stage. Rationalizing the bus itself to the old variation on the VA capsule with the original life support circuit docked to a far larger lander with a small transfer bus. This would enable a tiny hypergolic rocket to launch the capsule back to the Earth after a landing was conducted. Every component of the program was to be split directly between the OKBs to ensure cooperation and eliminate parallel efforts. Immediate criticisms however came from the single point of failure on the return bus, nonexistent life support margin, and the necessity of an earth and moon rendezvous. The separation of components will mean that any delay will cause significant slowdowns, but such is to be expected from a compromise project.
[]Stalingrad Plant Expansions: Now that the RLA itself is finalized, the question of securing sufficient production has come. The plant itself is ready to make a sufficient number of boosters for the current programs but it is expected that hundreds will be needed before the end of the decade. Expanding towards a secondary production line along with a significantly increased set of tooling for the construction of new engine bells will serve to lower prices and ensure an economy of scale. Current investments will be expensive new machinery, but even that will eventually lower costs. (100 Resources per Dice 0/200) (-9 CI2 Electricity -3 CI1 Steel -8 CI2 Non-Ferrous -5 CI1 Workforce)
Soviet investments followed at practically the same time, with partial buyouts of unproductive companies over important resources and those capable of tentative modernization. Buyouts have been conducted under a partial enterprise model, ensuring a stable transfer of capital and a direct influence on the ground for further modernization.
I think I've said this before, but from our sneak peeks on Discord, we will have a CA dams project that will complete it and its "Advanced Hydrological Stabilization Measures" follow up project. Personally, from what I've seen (though things may change as this was, again, a sneak peak) we will want to do it. So I don't think we should use dice to work on that this turn.As far as more general things for this turn's plan, I do think that "Hydrological Stabilization Measures" are absolutely vital.
Large-scale industrial resource extraction of each and every kind is a disaster from that point of view, but without it we get an entirely different and nasty set of problems anyway...the expansion of industrial factory farming will be a disaster in just about every area
water pollution, soil pollution, creation of new diseases, destroying local ecosystems, the destruction of rural towns
I can't comment on the work in question, but it occurs to me that the most infamous and deadly flu epidemic in recorded history happened at a time when "big farming" wasn't particularly big or industrialized.
You are not wrong, with possibly one or two fluke exceptions in there somewhere who really do have those principles.self abolition of the proletariat after all is part of the communist movement
but this quest does a great job of showing how the state capitalism that gets passed off as "socialism" is not socialism or communism at a
and that no politicians in the USSR are communists
they're all just capitalist developmentalists
I can't help it, I'd somehow find that about 100x less annoying.Instead we'll get people saying that we did land on the moon but are keeping it secret because reasons.
The US program killed people in OTL and still got Neil Armstrong to the Sea of Tranquility by July 1969. Remember the Apollo 1 fire.Not only this sounds rather pessimistic to me - US program is likely to kill people before getting them back from the moon, so I doubt we need to roll above 60 to get a mission that is very likely to do so before them safe-ish - even if we do lose the race, there's still prestige in getting there at all.
The good news is that in that scenario, by the time the Americans walk on the moon, it'll be just about time for Voz to retire anyway!i think it will be funny if we cancel the moon program, the americans get there, and then the supreme soviet panics and asks us why we didnt get there first.