Attempting to Fulfill the Plan MNKh Edition

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Could've sworn I read we were making 80 reactors a year somewhere. Oh well guess we just need to build second atomash! ;)
You might have confused it with the total amount of reactors one would get over a 5 year plan, 5*16=80 after all.

Also it is worth noting that the Soviet Union has a tendency towards a lot of power intensive heavy industry, so it uses a good chunk more energy then you might otherwise expect for an economy its size.
 
On the other hand, if we scale it up, we get (more) economy of scale...

Second atommash would cost less than the first, third and/or more even more so. And with more production, a singular reactor would be cheaper.
 
Wouldn't we reach at least 50% overall electricity production by nuclear if we continue atommash at 4 dice for 10 years?

Each core is 1 GW so 800 reactors produced meaning that would be at least 90% of OTL US electricity production in 2020s. Unless we are projected to have more than 2 times the demand of OTL US electricity production by 1990?

Edit: I'm asking because if our electricity demand is that high, we should have a higher GDP PPP in 1980s than OTL USA in 2020s. Unless we are dumping all that energy to make line to up.


Tldr; Comrades we are rich! Communism has won. This is the end of history!
Your math is off, at four dice it's 16 cores a year with approximately 8.5 TWh/y per core. Even at full bore funding that's 160 reactors. Approximately a third of the modern US grid over a decade.
 
Cannon Omake: New decade, new look: the new Moscow New
Here's another little omake named "New decade, new look: the new Moscow" just for you, so that I can end this day in a good mood, knowing that you'll have something nice - I hope - to read.

February 3, 1965

My dear Tilda,

I hope this letter finds you well. My plane trip from Stockholm to Moscow to attend the conference went very well. On arrival, I was struck by the extent of the urban transformations that have taken place here: the once drab and gray city that you could see on the news has been transformed into an urban center teeming with activity and cars, not to mention the endless streetcar and subway lines.

Moscow, once a city of composite architecture, is rapidly being transformed into a modern space, where majestic skyscrapers stand side by side with wide arterial roads lined with office blocks and government buildings. Entire districts, such as Dorogomilovo and Khamovniki, are perfect examples of this metamorphosis. It's a fascinating sight that leaves me in awe of the work that has gone into achieving it, even if the conversations I've had with passers-by lead me to believe that these changes have been brutal in nature, with little regard for the comfort of the inhabitants.

I was amazed at the number of cars in the city, and the dangers they pose to passers-by who are careless enough to walk instead of taking public transport, which is nothing compared to our capital. I even came close to being run over on several occasions during my free time exploring the city between two conferences! These Russians really are the worst drivers, and they respond with a barrage of insults to the slightest invective denouncing their dangerous driving!

Most impressive of all, however, is their new Palace of the Soviets. With its impressive 250-metre spire, according to our translator and guide, it's a powerful symbol of modernization. What's more, the Kremlin has also undergone a spectacular renovation: compared to the old photos we saw in the press, Red Square has been enlarged and the old structures replaced and remodeled to reflect a more contemporary aesthetic. There's even a necropolis dedicated to former Communist Party leaders now. I hope I'll have time to visit it between lectures: perhaps Vladimir can even act as my guide during my tour of renovated Moscow if we have enough time to see everything. In any case, I'll be sure to send you photos of all the changes, so that you can complete your album.

I think of you often and can't wait to see you again. I promise to bring back a few souvenirs from Moscow after the economics conference is over.

Take care, and see you soon.

With all my love,

Christian
 
Last edited:
Put another way, 4-dice Atomash making VVER-1000s would install electricity generation capacity roughly equivalent to all of France's present-day grid every five years. And that's barely enough for half of new demand. Our economy is big and it is getting bigger. Blackstar has said we've surpassed American GDP at PPP already.

OTL Developped country power demand plateaued after the eighties, but deindustrialization had a large part in that. I'm not sure if we'll ever have a drop off until around the Revolution's centenary when the demographic transition makes the size of the population plateau.
 
Not all OTL developed countries de-industrialized that much though, as a phenomenon it was particularly the USA that suffered from it. While for instance OTL Germany was one of those places that kept a surprising amount of it really. It's even hard to say at times if places really lost industries or if industrial growth slowed a lot and other parts of the economy just eclipsed it ever further. Combine that with losing some industry segments because low wages have an advantage, and you get how things are now I guess.


On a side note, I kind of wonder if the Soviet nuclear industry will unveil a new half gen improvement every 5 years, just to try and tempt the Ministry to keep funding them. They surely are aware the coal industry is super competitive and need to find ways to make nuclear look better. And the big decision on how much each industry gets is made every 5 years. So it would kind of make sense that every 5 years they had a new and improved nuclear reactor design that's obviously far better then the previous versions in every way including costs.
 
And cede more territory to the cars? Never.
Having our pedestrians turned into roadkill makes things worse, not better, in that regard. Roads that are unsafe to cross on foot strongly incentivize people to take a motor vehicle places even when they theoretically could walk or take mass transit, because getting run over crossing the street while walking the two blocks from the bus stop to your destination is very undesirable.
 
Simply elevate the road into a four way bridge at each intersection and let people walk freely through the under-intersection.
 
Normally the safer solution is to employ traffic calming structures, make the road less straight, and for there to be safe places for people to stop in the middle and such. Basically minimize the amount of road to cross in one go, as well as reduce the speed of the cars while raising how much drivers need to pay attention.

Though I have no idea if they'd go for that kind of approach in urban design in the USSR. It does tend to focus less on 'progress' and more on 'livability' after all.
 
Though I have no idea if they'd go for that kind of approach in urban design in the USSR. It does tend to focus less on 'progress' and more on 'livability' after all.

I got the impression that we tried everything.
We did build metro, subways, trains and buses for the people to travel in the city and between cities but there is simply too much people.

I do wonder how our population compares across the globe, we have been able to repeatedly increase and expand the quality of life in the URSS for roughly 30 uninterrupted years, no ?
 
Honestly, if our USSR have between 400 and 500 million peoples, it would not surprise me

Yeah, and we never had the same losses that the OTL URSS had during the war. We were able to contain the Nazi aggression early on, so the population who already had benefited from increased living standard was able - in theory - to have children and then these children got a better living standard, and now their grandson are also getting a better living standard in comparison to their parents.
 
I was amazed at the number of cars in the city, and the dangers they pose to passers-by who are careless enough to walk instead of taking public transport, which is nothing compared to our capital. I even came close to being run over on several occasions during my free time exploring the city between two conferences! These Russians really are the worst drivers, and they respond with a barrage of insults to the slightest invective denouncing their dangerous driving!

This is what happens when we leave Big Road unchecked!
 
Why are the space program rolls so goddamn cursed? The USSR's space program is ahead of the US despite our best efforts, not because of it, we've been eating shit on the rolls every single turn for irl years.

tbh I'd argue that it's such an issue that it's worth considering revising how it's handled, because getting constantly shit on in rolls despite us not doing anything wrong is very aggravating.
 
Back
Top