Remove ads

The Path Unending (A Cultivation Quest)

Reader mode
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] No, I cannot afford to lessen my techniques now. This lesson will be strictly academic. (No technique will be filtered, but Kong Zhi will learn the theory behind how to perform such an act)

Nah. We must do this as Elder Saini would have wanted us to (painfully).
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)

Whatever will get these techniques integrated faster. Warhounds cry and searing chariot are completely vestigial to our build, so it doesn't matter how many dice they have.
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
The Northern Aurochs Onslaught has wood, but we don't actually need it in there, and we can certainly add in other aspects to help it fit better later. In the meantime, the Charm in Full Flight is more than enough to cover that lack.
 
Mr. Prokosch said:
Whatever will get these techniques integrated faster. Warhounds cry and searing chariot are completely vestigial to our build, so it doesn't matter how many dice they have.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

For the record, I think Searing Chariot is the only one integrated faster by this of those two. We got the exact pills needed for Warhound's Cry and changing it to all be one kind of anam, if the number goes up even a little, then we lack a Wonder to compensate. With Searing Chriot, while we have pills for Rain, we have an actual Wonder for Fire (in fact, we have two), and it ups Wits to boot (which is capping our charmcrafting).

There's also an argument for Northern Aurochs Onslaught, but I think it's either that or Searing Chariot. With Warhound's Cry we lack the resources to take advantage of it losing an Anam type.
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)

We honestly don't need Rain the most in Searing Chariot. I actually like the other techniques having what they have and Auroch in particular should be as strong as possible since it's our main melee finisher to offset Hummingbird's relative lack of power.
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)

Removing Rain from Searing Chariot only reduces power by 20%, less if the remaining Fire aspect is powered up. Plus, we have 3 separate sources of Fire Anam. Speeds up integration, netting the +1 to WIT even faster.
 
[X] No, I cannot afford to lessen my techniques now. This lesson will be strictly academic. (No technique will be filtered, but Kong Zhi will learn the theory behind how to perform such an act)
 
[X] No, I cannot afford to lessen my techniques now. This lesson will be strictly academic. (No technique will be filtered, but Kong Zhi will learn the theory behind how to perform such an act)

Either remove rain from Chariot or wood from Onslaught in my opinion.
Edit: On second thought, it might be better to leave them alone.
 
Last edited:
[x] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] Yes, filtering a technique seems most wise. The loss in power will be negligible compared to the gain in efficiency. (A further subvote will be called should this option win)
 
[X] No, I cannot afford to lessen my techniques now. This lesson will be strictly academic. (No technique will be filtered, but Kong Zhi will learn the theory behind how to perform such an act)
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top