Remove ads

Springtime of Nations II: A European Republic Quest

Reader mode
The only close vote seems to be beeg danubia vs danubia + Illyria.
Adhoc vote count started by Aranfan on Jul 22, 2023 at 10:15 AM, finished with 143 posts and 105 votes.
[fed] [con] [rep]
Click to expand...
 
[X] [FED] We will propose a single Danubian Federation.
[X] [CON] We will expedite reconstruction within the Republic and certain appropriate areas
[x] [REP] Henceforth, we will be the Central European Republic
 
Central European Republic is so boring and technocratic though. It is simply a terrible name! Both of the proposals are! (Yes I am aware of the Central African Republic, yes I also think their name is terrible). Hell, calling it the Prague Republic (as it was created at the Prague Commission) is a better name if we must rename it imo.

Also a Prague Republic with a capital in Frankfurt is kind of funny.
 
Last edited:
Nevis said:
Central European Republic is so boring and technocratic though. It is simply a terrible name! Both of the proposals are! (Yes I am aware of the Central African Republic, yes I also think their name is terrible). Hell, calling it the Prague Republic (as it was created at the Prague Commission) is a better name if we must rename it imo.

Also a Prague Republic with a capital in Frankfurt is kind of funny.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Personally I'd just call it the universal republic then extend an open invitation to other radical countries to join. But this is the options on the table so.
 
[x] [FED] We will propose a single Danubian Federation.
[x] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[x] [REP] Henceforth, we will be the Central European Republic.
 
Last edited:
[X] [FED] We will propose a single Danubian Federation.
[X] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[X] [REP] Henceforth, we will be the Union of Central European Republics.
 
[X] [FED] We will propose a Danubian Federation and an Illyrian Federation.
[X] [FED] We will propose a Danubian Republic, an Illyrian Republic, and a Transylvanian Republic.
[X] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[X] [REP] We will not be making a change.
[X] [REP] Henceforth, we will be the Central European Republic.
 
Last edited:
[X] [FED] We will propose a Danubian Republic, an Illyrian Republic, and a Transylvanian Republic.
[X] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[X] [REP] We will not be making a change.
 
[x] [FED] We will propose a Danubian Federation and an Illyrian Federation.
[x] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[x] [REP] Henceforth, we will be the Central European Republic.
 
[X] [FED] We will propose a Danubian Republic, an Illyrian Republic, and a Transylvanian Republic.
[X] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[X] [REP] We will not be making a change.
 
What is the purpose of having multiple, weaker federations as opposed to one? Bordergore is not a valid concern.
 
[X] [FED] We will propose a Danubian Republic, an Illyrian Republic, and a Transylvanian Republic.
[X] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[X] [REP] We will not be making a change.
 
DanBaque said:
>literally a historical proposal for a greater Germany
>no longer accurate to call it Germany
????
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
We have essentially the entirety of the czech and slovenian peoples as part of our republic, and several regions with very little german population. So no, it's not accurate.

If we remained the German Republic, that would implicitly mean the non-german parts aren't considered to be part of the republic proper.
 
Last edited:
[X] [FED] We will propose a Danubian Federation and an Illyrian Federation.
[X] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[X] [REP] Henceforth, we will be the Central European Republic.
 
There's not much time left, but I'd like to encourage people to support a single federation over two or three of them. One of the primary reasons for this war was to get access to the territory and industry we need to feasibly win a war against the Entente and Russia. To do that, we need our allies to be as strong as possible when the next war rolls around, and a single federation is straightforwardly the best way to do that.

While a single Danubian federation *may* be more unstable—and the option doesn't say it would be, just that it could—it has a much higher ceiling as an effective ally in the next war. Adding in more federations, on the other hand, is shortsighted. While they may be more stable in the short term, they're going to inevitably develop competing interests that we would have to balance diplomatically, and we are directly told that they'd be worse allies. If we want to win the next war, a single federation is the better choice.
 
[X] [FED] We will propose a single Danubian Federation.
[X] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[X] [REP] Henceforth, we will be the Union of Central European Republics.

One Big Union.
 
[X] [FED] We will propose a single Danubian Federation.
[X] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[X] [REP] Henceforth, we will be the Union of Central European Republics.
 
[x] [FED] We will propose a single Danubian Federation.
[x] [CON] We will not modify our reconstruction plans at this time.
[x] [REP] Henceforth, we will be the Central European Republic.
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top