Astra Myst
Do you want a wish?
- Location
- Milky Way Galaxy
[X] Hold Schnäbele pending further discussions.
what is the point of a full apology? to make france feel better? that's stupid. to make them less likely to declare war? they're not going to! if you're going to release him at least insist on his guilt, because he is a spy!
No, the point is that we don't want war, lmao. Is that hard to grasp? The population doesn't want ANOTHER war, I don't want another war, since it turns it into a two-front conflict, and we all know how those end up for Germany. People apparently want to turn Shnäbele into the Franz Ferdinand of our timeline, which is beyond stupid.
Reminder that, unlike most votes in other Quests, this one will not be over when the most-voted option wins if it doesn't secure majority - since we are playing as Germany's National Assembly. So don't be disheartened if your option lost to an option that doesn't represent most of the Quest's players, since that means the vote isn't over yet!If a single option fails to secure a majority of the vote, we will move to a run-off between the top two choices.
It is absolutely in our interest! The Entente are ruthless imperialists and capitalist warmongers! They're our enemies by default! We should not practice "catch and release" on espionage rings by imperialists!And even if he isn't, the National Gendarmerie still mishandled this. It is not at all in the Republic's interest to make an enemy out of the Entente, rather the opposite in fact. If he actually was a spy, the proper course of action would have been to politely but firmly escort him back across the border.
I think voting for an option because you think the backlash to picking it will be good is a bad idea.The effects say french militarism will weaken which is good and this will increase our own militarism which is even better so we can start coordinating with the revolutionary undergrounds of eastern europe.
Ruthless imperialists and capitalist warmongers they may be, but they're also not currently allied to the Imperial League, and I want it to stay that way. The worst possible thing we can do now is provoke a war that the Imperial League will almost certainly join. When we eventually declare war on the Imperial League, there's a good chance the Entente won't join that war (as seen by the fact that there is a peace faction in their government now), but for the other way around, there is as far as I know no serious peace faction in the governments of the Imperial League. Let's deal with our weaker enemies first.It is absolutely in our interest! The Entente are ruthless imperialists and capitalist warmongers! They're our enemies by default! We should not practice "catch and release" on espionage rings by imperialists!
my god! there isn't going to be a war! i don't know how many times i have to say this!
This seems fairly straightforward to me.[] Hold Schnäbele pending further discussions.
There is clearly tension between the Emperor and his Minister of War, and that tension could be useful. Delay a final decision on Schnäbele to allow the government to formulate a set of demands, or even just to let France's internal pressures continue to develop.
EFFECT: Crisis continues. Minor negative impact on national stability. France may or may not declare war and the French war-hawks will be greatly strengthened. Relations with the Entente will decline. Unpredictable further potential consequences with the Entente.
what is the point of a full apology? to make france feel better? that's stupid. to make them less likely to declare war? they're not going to! if you're going to release him at least insist on his guilt, because he is a spy!
my god! there isn't going to be a war! i don't know how many times i have to say this!
Just the opposite. It's a gamble, and one where the folks betting on the French war party losing the political struggle have rather better reasons for their bets than the folks betting in the French war party winning (including the Emperor's opposition and the Senate's failure to mobilize).
I understand that argument, I'm just saying that there's still a possibility of there being a war, which can't simply be dismissed.Just the opposite. It's a gamble, and one where the folks betting on the French war party losing the political struggle have rather better reasons for their bets than the folks betting in the French war party winning (including the Emperor's opposition and the Senate's failure to mobilize).
"National honour and dignity" are no suitable substitute for national security. And anyway, they would only be besmirched in the eyes of shortshighted warmongers with no common or strategic sense.The national honour and dignity of Germany would be besmirched, if we were apologise to them on bended knees when we did nothing that any self respecting nation wouldn't do!
"Acceding to the Quai d'Orsay's stated demands" is hardly a "refusal to compromise." Rather the opposite. It makes further, and more extreme, demands more likely, if not in this crisis then down the line (lowering the tariff objectively served French interests as well).The best way to empower hardline right wingers is to refuse to compromise with them. Release the guy with apology and boulanger will look like the warmongering idiot he is.
I'm sure the Frenchman meeting with Landwehr smugglers who he has family ties with, when he should have been at a conference, was just engaging in a grand old reunion for no reason. The Gendarmerie know their stuff! This was a spy, pure and simple.
The best way to empower hardline right wingers is to refuse to compromise with them. Release the guy with apology and boulanger will look like the warmongering idiot he is.
If you gamble often enough, it's inevitable that eventually you will lose. Therefore, only gamble when the need is great and the prize worth the risk.Just the opposite. It's a gamble, and one where the folks betting on the French war party losing the political struggle have rather better reasons for their bets than the folks betting in the French war party winning (including the Emperor's opposition and the Senate's failure to mobilize).