Firstly as far as i was aware the social services are not currently being provided in any adequate manner.
Secondly perhaps the gentlemen of the radical factions favour a four front war the next time?
We already have enemies to the North, East and South, what on earth possesses you to wish to add the west to that list?
We have a responsibility to our constituents, to see to their safety, prosperity and freedom;
You propose to destroy the first and Second with war, and the Third with the defeat caused by foreign policy so divorced from reality it would be banned from the catholic church.
On The contrary we shall secure our peoples safety with peace, their prosperity with trade and their freedom with the strength that they will bring to Germany.
Comrades, I ask you this when you consider the plight of the children, the disabled, the retirees and other such unfortunate groups, that the distribution of the burden to the people simply increases their economic stresses and woes. Consider the plight of the average co-operative, for which their pursuit for profits, as slim as they may be, should have to choose between those workers it employs, and the people of the communities for which it services.
Of course, to the Vanguard Communist, this is but the fundamental problem of an economic for which it's basis is the continued existence of commodity markets for wherein the pursuit of profits remains paramount regardless of how equitable it may seem. To us, the abolishing of these systems is the fundamental solution to this issue, to remove the profit motive and reintroduce true cooperation amongst the comrades of the world!
However, many would digress, so I shall say no further on the matter.
Regardless, to the basis of the question, the Progressive Independents claim that their system shall introduce the social services needed to service the people. But for what use is a daycare when that child has naught to look forward at home but an empty bowl for dinner? For what use does easing the way for which our financial systems operate, when they must spend all that they earn for food and clothing? The Progressive Independent provides solutions, but those that which only protect the middling proletariat, instead of truly providing for all, for the poorest, as those who still live in the ruins of Dresden are.
And to the question of foreign policy, I beg to ask that the Revolution possesses only permanent interests, that being the liberation of the proletariat of the world. Should we simply bow to the powers of international finance, for the sake of "appeasing" the West, for the mere reason that they do not sharpen their knives against us in this moment? Should we then stand idly when our fellow brethren in London, in Paris, in St. Petersburg, Wien, New York, Rome, and many other places, ask for our aid in the fomenting of a truly international cause, since that, as the Progressives would imply, would keep the peace between us and the bourgeois scum that govern the world? Or perhaps we should betray the cornerstones of our revolution, keeping with the "international order" for the sake of this false peace, as we did so many decades ago, when the Polish people revolted against the pygmy tyrant of the East?
Do not stain further the memory of what our dear comrade Garibaldi said in that year of '69, that any course of "realpolitik" cannot, and should not, be just cause for the end of
another good republic.
