Voting is open
Good thing we went with the news.
So that leaves a few levels of response: homeland support, deniable material support, and open material support. This boils down to, respectively, propping up Victoria the nation so it can sustain greater efforts, sending Victoria equipment and telling them to pretend that they own it, and openly operating support assets on Victoria's behalf, trusting your unwillingness to escalate against Russia to keep their assets safe.
You can't confirm any of this, but the DoS's opinion is that Alexander will likely still try homeland support or deniable material support. You can't do much about homeland support, but it would mean that anything that frees Victoria up to send still has the critical failing of arriving by Victorian naval logistics. Deniable material support...well, the example getting batted around in the thread is Russian cargo planes. If they are openly Russian, you can't touch them without giving Alexander an excuse to actually declare a right and proper war on you. If they are not, then they are Victorian transport planes having to make supply drops to troop concentrations within range of your forward SAM launchers. And if you destroy them, Russia has no formal reason to declare war.
For example, "Victorian" cargo planes, escorted by "Victorian" fighter planes armed with antiradiation missiles for potshotting radar SAM sites. Never mind the Victorian pilot's thick Russian accent, or his freshly issued naturalization papers.
Or the fresh paint over the roundels.

Yeah, not something I wanna deal with.
 
So, Russian intervention.
shouldn't this be threadmarked to make sure everyone reads it? It seems quite a lot of important information.

It gives a lot more context on which to base the siege/no siege decision.

Personally, as long as we have at least a decent chance to retaliate against the not!russian cargo planes (that could actually never be sent to the battlefield), I think I'll risk the siege.

Who knows, we might even recover some of those supplies for ourselves
Good thing we went with the news.
REALLY good thing. No matter what we do NOW that choice already paid off
 
The reason the Negaverse hasn't reconvened yet is also the reason neither of my Negaverse posts actually covered the events of the war turns. I, quite frankly, do not feel up to the task of writing something on the same level as @huhYeahGoodPoint 's A Violent Wind, at least not in a manner that manages to intentionally paper over the fact that the players are making horrible decisions, while at the same time giving enough foreshadowing that the consequences of said actions aren't just coming out of nowhere. Giving just enough hints that things might not go well that the players can't rightly say they've been screwed over by GM fiat, while simultaneously having it be entirely believable that they would IGNORE said hints and then subsequently say they've been screwed over by GM fiat.
 
Last edited:
[X] Plan Needle and Hammer (No OWE)

[X] Plan Needle and Hammer


Yeah, I think siege is a non viable option, we need to finish this ASAP So (EDIT) we really don't want to give Alex's people time to get crafty, you know?

I'd favor Needle and Hammer because not using OWE in an urban slog will make things more complicated for us, OTOH, Tanks and urban isn't what I'd call a good match, so I am open to both options
 
Last edited:
We will be arriving ahead of schedule and begin building seigeworks.
Correction: That's wrong.

It takes the Toledo force three days to get to Monroe.
We are about to spend two or three days dealing with the Savior Division.
Then after that it takes another week to prepare before starting Siege.

They are going to be well entrenched before we can do anything.
No matter what we choose.
 
ok, @Simon_Jester and @uju32 , you have NEARLY convinced me. Your arguments do make sense after all.

I'll wait for poptart's infopost, just in case. if Russian intervention is showed as likely I'll probably change to one of the limited assault plans.
Wait, did @PoptartProdigy promise us an infopost on the likelihood of Russian support for the Viks?

[oh cool]

Still, couldn't we do something like "siege, if Russia starts sending resources go full assault"? We wouldn't need much time to attack if we were prepared, and if we attacked quickly enough they might not have the time to sort and distribute whatever supplies they get.
Firstly, we'd need to keep our troops at constant high readiness to launch a huge attack at any moment on very short notice. That's actually kind of difficult. Normally you make a plan to launch an offensive on "Day D, Hour H" and everyone spends a while getting ready, then goes all "GO GO GO!"

But to do what you're proposing, we'd need to get everyone ready then go "wait for it, waaait for it..." and be constantly ready to attack on short notice at any time. For weeks. Or months. This presents some problems. We'd be keeping large stockpiles of supplies in forward positions ready to go, potentially where the Victorians can hit them with mortars. Our field commanders will be sending messages like "uh hey, I know we're supposed to be constantly ready to go, but some of my technicals are starting to make funny noises from the engine block, can I send them back to the maintenance depot for a few days?" Our troops would become psychologically stressed, knowing that they may be expected at any moment to fight a huge battle, but not knowing when that battle will come.

...

Secondly, it is alarmingly possible that the Russians will hand out the good stuff. Modern antitank rockets capable of blowing up our tanks (and what they'll do to our technicals doesn't bear thinking on). Infantry body armor. Deadlier antipersonnel munitions for the Victorian mortars. We'd have a very narrow window between the moment we realize that the Victorians are getting supplies (deniable or otherwise) direct from Russia, and the moment at which we realize that the Victorians have suddenly become much harder targets, more revitalized and combat-ready.

...

Thirdly, once the Russians are supplying the pocketed Victorian troops, there are likely to be Russian nationals present on the ground in the territory the Victorians occupy. This may greatly complicate our efforts to cut their supplies during an assault, and presents the risk that we'll end up killing Russian nationals (excuse me, "aid workers" and "observers") in the process of beating the Victorians- which in turn makes the Russians more likely to come back for revenge in the short to medium term.

Of course this gives them time to entrench their position, but at the same time it comes with the mental pressure of a prolonged siege without no certainty of reinforcements, and a possibility of mutinies, diseases, possibly starting stages of starvation depending on how much food they currently have..
I mean, yes. But at the same time, if the Russians (or even the Victorians just hiring cargo jets on their own) somehow turn that around and re-open a supply line, a lot of that pressure is relieved.

Plus, RIGHT NOW they are under an entirely different kind of pressure. The army that went northeast to attack through Essex County just disappeared in a burst of screaming and "WHY GOD WHY!?" Then their attack slogged through constant harassment and shelling, and when they made contact suddenly took the worst casualties a Victorian force has suffered since the 2040s (well, aside from the Essex County campaign), shattering multiple infantry divisions. The CMC, which is supposed to be the mighty, nigh-irrresistible spearhead, was broken. Killed. Entirely. They're dead. They're all dead.

The rest of the tanks are driving north now. They will never come back.

Right on the heels of that, the Victorians are going to be under a kind of pressure that has a certain... momentum... all its own. Terror. The knowledge that every force that's ever made contact with the Commonwealth was shattered and gone within no more than two weeks of the first full-scale exchanges of fire.

If we settle in for a siege, we give the surviving Victorians some time to adjust to that. Time to establish a new routine, a 'new normal.' Miserable as those conditions may be, they represent stability and sameness rather than chaos and terror. A chance for men who are on the edge of total panic to get a grip on themselves, for officers to provide reassurance to their troops, and for the remaining CMC commissars to make sure all the officers are still reliable.

I expect Victorian morale to follow a zig-zag shape if we go with this plan. It's been going down and will continue to do so for a while, but then will partially improve after weeks and weeks pass with no aggressive pressure from the Commonwealth troops. Viks will start to whisper "maybe whatever they did is something they can't do twice." If and only if we can keep their supply line cut, their morale eventually start to fall again, as the food and supplies wear out and the psychological pressure increases.

Also, how hard would it be to hit the cargo once it's parachuted with our current artillery?
Doesn't that depend on where they airdrop it? Consider that they DO control quite a bit of land that's completely out of artillery range from both our gunboats on the lake and our artillery positions that we'll be setting up north of the Raisin River for this offensive.

I'm pretty sure we aren't going to be able to shell Toledo Express Airport, in other words.



So, Russian intervention.

They have never committed actual military forces as a cobelligerent. Naval support, sometimes, air power, occasionally, but never in direct hostilities. Russia has never fired shots in anger at an American successor. They blockaded the Pacific Republic, but that stayed cold.
Sara Goldblum:

"Shots in cold blood, now..."

[clenches angry fist]

[but anyway]

Your Department of State believes that, with the situation as it stands, had you not given foreign reporters and observers the go-ahead on watching the action, Russia would already be flying over massive cargo planes with Russian flags on the wings to ensure that the last-standers have an untouchable supply pipeline.
DING DING DING.

But you did allow the foreigners to observe, and they have communicated home firsthand reports of you wiping out a CMC division and killing thousands of soldiers before withdrawing in good order. They have communicated the Victorians committing to suicide charges and last stands. They have communicated you eradicating a field army of fifty thousand. They have communicated to the outside world not only that you are going down swinging, but that you are winning.

With that kind of information, it is likely that Alex is going to be far more hesitant about openly supporting Victorian operations. Because now the international community has news that you are actually a viable challenger worth supporting.

You can't confirm any of this, but the DoS's opinion is that Alexander will likely still try homeland support or deniable material support. You can't do much about homeland support, but it would mean that anything that frees Victoria up to send still has the critical failing of arriving by Victorian naval logistics. Deniable material support...well, the example getting batted around in the thread is Russian cargo planes. If they are openly Russian, you can't touch them without giving Alexander an excuse to actually declare a right and proper war on you. If they are not, then they are Victorian transport planes having to make supply drops to troop concentrations within range of your forward SAM launchers. And if you destroy them, Russia has no formal reason to declare war.
Well yes, but they could also be Victorian transport planes landing at Toledo's airport, which is quite a ways from the Raisin River, far enough that I'm not confident our SAMs can reach that far.

None of this is to say that Russian aid is not a problem. It is, and countering it would be a feature of the siege, if you conduct a siege. But given the press you've secured for yourselves, you believe that Russia will not decide to back you into a corner by sending over their own flagged equipment to resupply the Vicks and daring you to fuck yourself by shooting them down.
That is a relief. But even their deniable aid would be a big problem for us, potentially. Big enough that I'd rather avoid the possibility.

I never said "before resupply can happen". I said it would render it moot.

If I wanted to starve the Victorians out, I would have chosen blockade.
The point is to crack them under the pressure.

The Victorians are not falling back to Toledo.

They are digging into the south bank.

We will be arriving ahead of schedule and begin building seigeworks.

The entire time shells are going to be falling on the Vics and sharpshooters are going after anyone who appears in the open.

And we will be blasting demands for surrender and other psychological warfare at them.

And, on top of it all, they are not trained for this type of warfare. They are literally trained to despise people who cower in defense.

The Vics will break. I don't know how many at a time, or in what way, but they will.
One lesson I think we should have learned from the Victorians is to never make a battle plan that depends on being able to maneuver the enemy's forces along with your own.

We think we know how the Victorians will react. We don't actually know how they'll react. As such, making a plan that plays entirely off their psychological state while ignoring or sidelining material factors strikes me as... unwise.

What if the Victorians don't break? What if they dig in faster than we expect, or if our fairly limited artillery capability isn't enough to dig them out of their holes? What if they just grimly hang on, singing "A Mighty Fortress Is Our God" and blessing the "Victorian" pilots who bring them fresh food and ammunition over the rubble-strewn and cratered roads between them and the airfield at Toledo?

We don't actually control what the Victorians do in response to our actions here.

Which means that if we want to dislodge them from the south bank of the Raisin, we need to be prepared to do that by force.
 
Last edited:
Correction: That's wrong.

It takes the Toledo force three days to get to Monroe.
We are about to spend two or three days dealing with the Savior Division.
Then after that it takes another week to prepare before starting Siege.

They are going to be well entrenched before we can do anything.
No matter what we choose.
I know that. But, my plans expectation is to clean up the suicide squad a day faster.

I meant our troops are going to arrive quicker than the Vics hope or expect. It's a psychological thing.
 
I know that. But, my plans expectation is to clean up the suicide squad a day faster.

I meant our troops are going to arrive quicker than the Vics hope or expect. It's a psychological thing.
The Victorians cannot possibly have an exact to-the-day calculation of how long they think it will take our troops to finish off their forlorn hope offensive at the Huron Line and move south.

Among other things, "Saddle up the Old World Equipment and fucking delete those bastards" is still an option on our menu. They can't assume the Savior Division plus modest infantry support will last any longer than the eastern army or the CMC did.

...

Plus, y'know, that whole thing about how it's usually a good idea not to make too many assumptions about how the enemy will react to your actions. Especially if that would result in us following a war plan where if the enemy doesn't react as expected, they have an easy way to frustrate the hell out of us and put us in a bad position.
 
I favor a limited assault on the enemy. Any military plan that assumes a passive enemy is not a plan. It is wishing. The Russians will intervene and the Russians have historically been quite brazen in supporting their client states in barely deniable ways. Several months of siege is more than enough time for the enemy to make a plan. Time is no longer on our side. We must move quickly or lose a chance to destroy the Victorian army.

[X] Plan Needle and Hammer

[X] Plan Needle and Hammer (No OWE)

[X] Plan Uranus
 
I know that. But, my plans expectation is to clean up the suicide squad a day faster.

I meant our troops are going to arrive quicker than the Vics hope or expect. It's a psychological thing.
Doesnt matter.

Lemme assume you're right. You somehow manage one day to eradicate Savior Division.
Then one week to prepare for a siege. 8 days versus 9 days, a reduction of 11%, is not going to make much difference to the Victorians. They were already expecting us to move fast after we took a day to break the Leamington force.

Only if you were going Full Assault, which only takes 3 days to prep for, would it matter.
Because you'd be hitting them in 4 days.
 
Last edited:
Doesnt matter.

Lemme assume you're right. You somehow manage one day to eradicate Savior Division.
Then one week to prepare for a siege.
8 days versus 9 days, a reduction of 11%, is not going to make much difference to the Victorians. They were already expecting us.

Only if you were going Full Assault, which only takes 3 days to prep for, would it matter.
Because you'd be hitting them in 4 days.

This is teh point and, frankly? at this stage I do feel an all in assault would be preferable to any siege attempt.
We simply can't surprise the last standers to any apreciable degree, unless you decide to deal with the forlon hope with part of our forces (chancy) and move with the rest to siege and even then the vics there will have "days" to prepare for us
 
Haven't watched the whole thing yet but the opening segment about the day of the Typhoon already has me skeptical of his knowledge and tempted to not watch the whole thing. Typhoons didn't carry 8-inch diameter rockets, the RP-3 was a 3-inch rocket with a 5.4kg warhead and can be carried in quantities of 8 rockets per plane. It's a big detail to get wrong because not only would 8-inch rockets be taking up more space on a plane's wing in addition to the potential increased lethality, it's something that will noticeably impact a plane's performance and the amount it can safely carry!

He also made an incredibly novice mistake and claimed that a typhoon's rocket barrage is equal to a heavy cruiser's broadside on the basis of the diameter of its loadout... Even ignoring how the mistakes of earlier statements are being perpetuated and going forward with assuming that it was meant to be about the RP-3s instead as well as using a metric that actually compares like measurements (kg of explosives delivered), it still doesn't add up because the smallest broadside of a British heavy cruiser (6 eight-inch HE projectiles) delivers 60kg of explosives while a Typhoon only delivers 43.2kg of explosives. The difference between them is about 16.8 kg in favor of the heavy cruiser which is a pretty big gap! One can say that on a technicality the Typhoon's loadout of RP-3s merely has to match or exceed the broadside of a cruiser which would describe how it can deliver more kg of explosives than its six-inch gun light cruiser counterparts; but it's blatently clear what Lindy intended to use in his comparison. It's pretty hard to trust that he knows what he's talking about when he makes such a simple mistake that can be easily rectified by google in an edited video essay.
I disagree with how severe and relevant that mistake actually is and I don't think it invalidates the rest of his video. By weight of explosive and pace of fire, a Typhoon RP-3 strike seems at least in the same ballpark as a cruiser broadside. That seems close enough for the point to work for me. Does it really matter when you're being hit by artillery whether it's a 155mm shell or an RP-3 rocket or a heavy mortar round? It would be hard to tell those apart in the confusion of combat, and it wouldn't necessarily be very relevant which is which - at least to a grunt. You don't want to be standing in the open in any case, and since large parts of the video essay were about the psychology of bombardment such a mistake does not cripple the points he makes.

However, I'm more aware than ever that he doesn't seem to cite his sources. I am adjusting my confidence down a few notches even as it remains overall high.
 
Good thing we went with the news.


For example, "Victorian" cargo planes, escorted by "Victorian" fighter planes armed with antiradiation missiles for potshotting radar SAM sites. Never mind the Victorian pilot's thick Russian accent, or his freshly issued naturalization papers.
Or the fresh paint over the roundels.

Yeah, not something I wanna deal with.

Last time they flew into our AA envelope, they lost 30 fighters out of 50.
If they risk supply planes, less agile than fighters, they will just piss supplies to the wind and feed free images of exploding supply planes to reporters.
 
The Victorians cannot possibly have an exact to-the-day calculation of how long they think it will take our troops to finish off their forlorn hope offensive at the Huron Line and move south.

Among other things, "Saddle up the Old World Equipment and fucking delete those bastards" is still an option on our menu. They can't assume the Savior Division plus modest infantry support will last any longer than the eastern army or the CMC did.

...

Plus, y'know, that whole thing about how it's usually a good idea not to make too many assumptions about how the enemy will react to your actions. Especially if that would result in us following a war plan where if the enemy doesn't react as expected, they have an easy way to frustrate the hell out of us and put us in a bad position.
ironically assuming how the enemy would react is exactly what the Victorians did. Assuming that we will win the morale victory is not a given. Assuming that we will out maneuver them is not a given.
 
The reason the Negaverse hasn't reconvened yet is also the reason neither of my Negaverse posts actually covered the events of the war turns. I, quite frankly, do not feel up to the task of writing something on the same level as @huhYeahGoodPoint 's A Violent Wind, at least not in a manner that manages to intentionally paper over the fact that the players are making horrible decisions, while at the same time giving enough foreshadowing that the consequences of said actions aren't just coming out of nowhere. Giving just enough hints that things might not go well that the players can't rightly say they've been screwed over by GM fiat, while simultaneously having it be entirely believable that they would IGNORE said hints and then subsequently say they've been screwed over by GM fiat.
See, I was thinking about this -

and then I remembered the Victorians got absolutely dominated in the Pacific War in pretty much every single way right up until the Pacific Republic collapsed. Moreover, there'd be basically no way of hiding it from the players; they would at least know that they've been being bodied left and right when even Lindtopia reports that "yes in fact our aircraft are fucking swept from the sky lol and the artillery's been pounding us nonstop and we're losing like ten men for every one of theirs".

So. This may actually be not an unfamiliar feeling for them, and moreover, there might be precedent for the QM to show them screwed over like this.

Perhaps with a warning of "You just tried to solo the last great bastion of American might across the fucking continent without nuclear weapons or a plan to neutralize their armed forces other than YOLO. You fucking lucky dipshits, you're so goddamn lucky the Tsar hasn't rolled beneath a ninety this whole campaign."
 
[X] Plan Uranus

[X] Plan Needle and Hammer

[X] Plan Needle and Hammer (No OWE)

[X] Plan Rockeye is uncreative about names
 
Last edited:
Last time they flew into our AA envelope, they lost 30 fighters out of 50.
If they risk supply planes, less agile than fighters, they will just piss supplies to the wind and feed free images of exploding supply planes to reporters.
That's not what Uju was talking about. Uju was talking about the Russians themselves providing modern or semi-modern fighters, slapping on white paint to make them look Victorian, and having Russian totally not Russian Russian-speaking Victorian pilots operate them. With modern, unsabotaged weaponry, including standoff missiles that home in on air defense radars. When our air defense crews (1/5 trained) don't have the skill to counteract that kind of threat effectively.

Our air defense network would fall apart like a house of cards under that kind of pressure. And it's little or no different from what, historically, the Russians did for North Korea in 1951 or so. It'd take them some time to set up though, so if we move quickly we can be done before the Russians get that level of muscle into position.

ironically assuming how the enemy would react is exactly what the Victorians did. Assuming that we will win the morale victory is not a given. Assuming that we will out maneuver them is not a given.
Yeah. That's why I'm a fan of applying pressure to the Victorians through media such as bullets, which don't give a shit whether their morale has broken or not. :p
 
See, I was thinking about this -

and then I remembered the Victorians got absolutely dominated in the Pacific War in pretty much every single way right up until the Pacific Republic collapsed. Moreover, there'd be basically no way of hiding it from the players; they would at least know that they've been being bodied left and right when even Lindtopia reports that "yes in fact our aircraft are fucking swept from the sky lol and the artillery's been pounding us nonstop and we're losing like ten men for every one of theirs".

So. This may actually be not an unfamiliar feeling for them, and moreover, there might be precedent for the QM to show them screwed over like this.

Perhaps with a warning of "You just tried to solo the last great bastion of American might across the fucking continent without nuclear weapons or a plan to neutralize their armed forces other than YOLO. You fucking lucky dipshits, you're so goddamn lucky the Tsar hasn't rolled beneath a ninety this whole campaign."
Cut to new players thinking The Northern Confederacy dominated, because that's what it says on the front page summary, which is explicitly in universe propaganda? There might be potential here.
 
Last edited:
That's not what Uju was talking about. Uju was talking about the Russians themselves providing modern or semi-modern fighters, slapping on white paint to make them look Victorian, and having Russian totally not Russian Russian-speaking Victorian pilots operate them. With modern, unsabotaged weaponry, including standoff missiles that home in on air defense radars. When our air defense crews (1/5 trained) don't have the skill to counteract that kind of threat effectively.

Our air defense network would fall apart like a house of cards under that kind of pressure. And it's little or no different from what, historically, the Russians did for North Korea in 1951 or so. It'd take them some time to set up though, so if we move quickly we can be done before the Russians get that level of muscle into position.

Yeah. That's why I'm a fan of applying pressure to the Victorians through media such as bullets, which don't give a shit whether their morale has broken or not. :p
fair enough...

[X] Plan Needle and Hammer (No OWE)

[X] Plan Needle and Hammer
 
Last edited:
That's not what Uju was talking about. Uju was talking about the Russians themselves providing modern or semi-modern fighters, slapping on white paint to make them look Victorian, and having Russian totally not Russian Russian-speaking Victorian pilots operate them. With modern, unsabotaged weaponry, including standoff missiles that home in on air defense radars. When our air defense crews (1/5 trained) don't have the skill to counteract that kind of threat effectively.

Our air defense network would fall apart like a house of cards under that kind of pressure. And it's little or no different from what, historically, the Russians did for North Korea in 1951 or so. It'd take them some time to set up though, so if we move quickly we can be done before the Russians get that level of muscle into position.

Yeah. That's why I'm a fan of applying pressure to the Victorians through media such as bullets, which don't give a shit whether their morale has broken or not. :p

I do not think Tsar will pull actual cold war planes into hands of vicks all of a sudden, not on a short notice. They lack doctrine and skills to operate them anyway. And using his own forces - well, poptart has addressed that already. No Russian soldiers and thus not a single vicky who knows how to use cold war equipment, not in this war.
Thus not a single piece of cold war era equipment in hands of vickies, cause they lack skills to utilize it.


Granted, I do not know what time is needed to train soldiers to use brand new for them equipment under brand new doctrine which goes against every single second of your previous doctrine thought.
 
Secondly, it is alarmingly possible that the Russians will hand out the good stuff. Modern antitank rockets capable of blowing up our tanks (and what they'll do to our technicals doesn't bear thinking on). Infantry body armor. Deadlier antipersonnel munitions for the Victorian mortars. We'd have a very narrow window between the moment we realize that the Victorians are getting supplies (deniable or otherwise) direct from Russia, and the moment at which we realize that the Victorians have suddenly become much harder targets, more revitalized and combat-ready.
Actually, I'm pretty sure that there are existing Russian stockpiles of modern and slightly outdated military equipment in Victoria.

It just makes sense to establish logistics nodes near possible conflict zones, just like the US currently has stockpiles everywhere from Israel to Norway. And it would allow them to quickly pass out weapons to mercenaries and local recruits like Victoria commanded during the Pacific War.

Alexander has never missed a trick before. I don't expect him to start now.

Last time they flew into our AA envelope, they lost 30 fighters out of 50.
The last time Victorian fighter pilots flew into our envelope, flying a 1970s vintage fighter, they lost that many planes.
Russian Volunteer pilots who totally retired from the Russian Airforce and moved to Victoria are a very different breed.
They certainly don't share Victoria's fetishes about avoiding air to ground combat; ask Burns.

Please do not judge deniable Russian reinforcements by the standards of the VAF.

If they risk supply planes, less agile than fighters, they will just piss supplies to the wind and feed free images of exploding supply planes to reporters.


That is the AGM-88 High Speed Antiradiation Missile or HARM.
Designed to lock on to enemy radar, like the firecontrol radars that is necessary to guide SAMs, and kill it.
It has a range of 150km, a top speed of 2280 km/hr, and has been in US service since 1985.

The Vics just didn't buy them.

There are ways around the threat as a defender, like radars built into the missile itself, and moving your radar transmitters.
Our air defence network isnt really set up for that sort of pressure though.
Quality 1/5 + outdated equipment.
 
Last edited:
It sounds like we need to actively court foreign sponsors. I'm sure at least some of America's allies in Europe and Australia are intact enough to give us modern military tech and don't want Russian hegemony to continue. And of course we need to keep getting stuff smuggled from California.
 
I do not think Tsar will pull actual cold war planes into hands of vicks all of a sudden, not on a short notice. They lack doctrine and skills to operate them anyway. And using his own forces - well, poptart has addressed that already. No Russian soldiers and thus not a single vicky who knows how to use cold war equipment, not in this war.
Thus not a single piece of cold war era equipment in hands of vickies, cause they lack skills to utilize it.

Granted, I do not know what time is needed to train soldiers to use brand new for them equipment under brand new doctrine which goes against every single second of your previous doctrine thought.
No OPEN Russian soldiers. Deniable Russian soldiers are fair game. Look at the east of Ukraine, and all the little green men on leave from the Russian army wielding totally not-Russian gear and not-Russian tanks under not-Russian orders to aid the rebels. They even gave them fucking SAMs, like the Buk that shot down Malaysian Airlines Flight 370.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top