It is unfortunate that the citizens of Kymai view the law of our noble League as being such undesirable things. But we should not allow this to cause our focus to waver, our goal is and must be, to forge a cohesive Epulian Culture throughout the League. Allowing such a substantial power as Kymai to flout the law which exists in large part to bring this about is to invite greater problems upon ourselves in the future. We cannot endlessly take decisions in the present while ignoring the problems they will bring about.
I don't think the problems are going to be that big. Future colonies founded by us are going to be smaller than Nea Kymai's starting size, and founded entirely or almost entirely by people from the Epulian League. They are
not going to be able to point to a centuries-long history of independent existence and prior culture, and are not going to be the last remnant of a conquered city.
It will not be difficult to argue that the same situation simply doesn't apply in that case.
Honestly, I think the Metic situation is considerably more serious than the Kymai decision. The problem with the previous Assembly - and this was pointed out at the time - wasn't that any of the suggestions were individually terrible ideas (in fact they were all good) but that by giving them so much at once we would obviously set their expectations at an unrealistically high level. The problem is that now that we've done it once they're explicitly pushing their luck and asking for more than is reasonable.
That, or they're
rationally asking for multiple things they know they won't get all of, but all of which are popular among the metics, and so that we can be put in a position of choosing one of several things if we do elect to give them anything.
This is a haggling culture still, and people know about the idea of asking high in the full expectation of being bargained down.
The problem is, again, not that these requests are inherently unreasonable... but politics is about more than having the right policy. This isn't just about what reforms are granted but how they're granted. Are they forced from the citizenry under the threat of civil unrest or are they reforms jointly enacted? Are they brought about in a way that makes the citizens look at Metics as grasping and greedy always pressing and asking for more? Are the reforms being passed in a measured and sensible way?
I didn't hear a word about "threats" in the entire update.
For that matter, I don't like the repeated characterization of their requests as "unreasonable." They aren't, really. They may be more than the city thinks it can afford, or more than it's willing to give, but none of them are
unreasonable. It's not out of the question for the
proboulos to invite a metic elected by the Metic Assembly to speak to the
ekklesia. There are places in the Greek world where that would happen. It's not unreasonable or insane for them to ask for debt or tax relief, people ask for that all the time all over the world. Sometimes they get it, sometimes they don't.
I mean, what would "reasonable" even look like if this is "unreasonable?" They could ask for the same things, only less (a
five percent tax cut, relief of
half the debts), I guess? Except that if we weren't strapped for cash due to our own projects, the financial size of the things they're asking for wouldn't be out of the question for a once-every-eight-years expenditure. Remember that from the point of view of the Metics, they only even get to gather to ask us for
anything about three times in a generation under current laws. That means they can't afford to blow their opportunity on something penny-ante or trivial that won't significantly alleviate the problems the metics face. They literally can't afford to, in some cases, because many of them are already in crushing debt or under a crushing tax burden that may drive them
into debt.