- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA
Yeah, and some of that was actually writing that non-Apokoliptians can appreciate. The incident where heard his foster mom planning to commit suicide, flew out to stop her, but was too late because soundwaves take time to travel and she'd already pulled the trigger by the time he heard her take the safety off? That bit where his hair can impale and shred human flesh if touched, because his super-durability means they're basically organic monoblades?No. That's not Superman. That's an abused child who was raised up thinking he had to be perfect.
Those are legitimately interesting little ideas, if a bit depressing. It's still not worth reading Irredeemable.
Oh, you're quite right that it's not a deconstruction, in the same way that FATAL isn't a deconstruction of Dungeons & Dragons. As for praising him?It's not a deconstruction of Superman's ideals. It's praising Superman himself. It's saying that no one else besides Superman could deal with what he has to go through. It's showing how loopy the Plutonian was, because he tried to live up to an ideal that was impossible to live up to.
Get out. You might as well argue that the Bad-Ass comics were written to "praise" Captain America.
This comic is 90% about showing an unbearable Villain Sue strut around being a shitlord with nobody able to stop him, ever; any sympathy I might feel for the cast being stuck in such a place largely dissolves when it turns out that half of them are "just" douchebags. Their Hawkeye sold out multiple civilizations to their reality's equivalent of the Daleks "to spare Earth" (and considering he started doing this before the Plutonian decided to be a dickpenis to everybody else, that argument rings rather hollow, even if you're willing to accept that fucking over dozens of planets to save just one is okay).
The one decent super I mentioned? He's a strong expy of Hawkman - a winged warrior who's been around since ancient days. His wife decides to cheat on him because he's not a bodice-ripping sex machine, and instead places primacy on emotional intimacy (since, as a centuries-old immortal, sex lost its novelty long ago). Then, he ends up getting beat to shit and having his wings ripped off, as if the author is going "Wait, this guy's actually nice? Yeah, fuck that noise; not in my comic!"
The problem is that the Plutonian is bullshit invincible and omnipotent, and if the villain is completely impossible to defy or defeat, then you're just reading about how the villain wins at everything forever - and when said villain is a mass-murdering rapist who often goes out of his way to traumatize and kill his former friends, that doesn't make for pleasant reading.
You did see the part where I stated that, as far as I can tell, The Boys is a setting you could declare Exterminatus on with minimal moral problems, right? Arguing that X is okay because something like that is worse is about as valid as invoking Godwin's Law.You think this is the most mean-spirited thing you've ever read. Ha. The Boys is worse than this. At least there are good people in Irredeemable. Uber is worse, at least in tone (no matter how much I love it).
Also, Uber's own author openly stated that it was purposefully written to be unpleasant and devoid of positive qualities. If you can enjoy reading that... then fine. Can't possibly comprehend your psychology there, but fine. Go ahead.
When you recommend something like it without appending the necessary warning labels, then we have a problem.