Because fear is exausting. The simple truth is thay fear can only motivate for so long. Hope is a much more cruel motivator.If fear is what's motivating him to become a better person, why would the SI take that fear away?
Because fear is exausting. The simple truth is thay fear can only motivate for so long. Hope is a much more cruel motivator.If fear is what's motivating him to become a better person, why would the SI take that fear away?
If someone is genuinely trying to be a better person and turn their life around is there really any good reason to complain about why their doing it?
Whether they don't want to go to prison, had a brush with death and are thinking about their mortality, or just had a epiphany about the way their life is going, as long as it's a sincere effort to better themselves I'm all for it. Those are some of my favorite kind of stories. A bad guy going straight.
If you want to say his efforts don't count because they involve Christianity and someone that knows they've been a sinner, that's your opinion and you're welcome to it, but I disagree.
That being said, this is just a story so it's all semantics anyway you slice it. The guy could end up being the big bad of this arc for all I know.
Now THAT is a question for the ages.
Also, does it really matter if the result is basically the same?
To give him hope? Fear is only a good motivator if what it is motivating you toward carries the hope of being away from the thing you fear.
Generally, no. That's why the SI disagrees with Sinestro. On the other hand, this man is doing good while motivated by fear.Meaning that "fear of punishment" does not necessarily mean "doing good".
It sort of doesn't. Your soul will go somewhere. A really hardcore atheist might become a ghost... Or they might be draw into The Land of the Unliving, which would be very bad.It could also mean" make a deal with the punisher", "get rid of the punishment altogether" (not realistic here) or, in this case, declare yourself an atheist (although admittedly I don't know how that would work if Gods are real. Is it enough to simply state it somewhere loudly?)
It sort of doesn't. Your soul will go somewhere. A really hardcore atheist might become a ghost... Or they might be draw into The Land of the Unliving, which would be very bad.
The difference being that other motivations are vastly more sustainable and reliable. How do you know that his solution to the fear of being punished is something we would consider good? Fear, generally speaking, doesn't make a sound mind and rational decisions.
Also, as Marcus said...
Meaning that "fear of punishment" does not necessarily mean "doing good".
It could also mean" make a deal with the punisher", "get rid of the punishment altogether" (not realistic here) or, in this case, declare yourself an atheist (although admittedly I don't know how that would work if Gods are real. Is it enough to simply state it somewhere loudly?)
I think that you need a replacement afterlife, even if your replacement afterlife it to detach your soul from any plane of existance what-so-ever and desolve into the background energies.It could also mean" make a deal with the punisher", "get rid of the punishment altogether" (not realistic here) or, in this case, declare yourself an atheist (although admittedly I don't know how that would work if Gods are real. Is it enough to simply state it somewhere loudly?)
Possibly something to look into when the risk to reward ratio is a bit more...Viable.Generally, no. That's why the SI disagrees with Sinestro. On the other hand, this man is doing good while motivated by fear.
It seems sort of biased that it could only connect with either heaven or hell.It sort of doesn't. Your soul will go somewhere. A really hardcore atheist might become a ghost... Or they might be draw into The Land of the Unliving, which would be very bad.
Because this is DC; i fully expect demons to start trying to make deals with him or some shit.Also, OL is a utalitarian right? Or something like that? And Mr Edge seems to be moving in the right direction, so why waste time and resources on another thing and interfere with that.
Oh, I'll be changing that a little.It seems sort of biased that it could only connect with either heaven or hell.
Because this is DC; i fully expect demons to start trying to make deals with him or some shit.
Because no one deserves eternal suffering?If fear is what's motivating him to become a better person, why would the SI take that fear away?
But he's repenting. Genuinely. And the SI knows that. As such, no eternal suffering.
Yeah, that would make more sense.
I... genuinely can't follow this. Its not that I don't understand the... motives(?) of the... characters(?) or anything specific like that(though, I don't), I just... do not understand what this is depicting. There are a lot frames where people are doing seemingly unrelated things, there's a lot of apparently conflicting dialogue that oscillates between "communist revolutionary speech" and "Alex Jone's Infowars", I can't tell who is doing what or even keep track of characters... what is this?
Has Paul investigated how hard it would be to make a ward that gives a false image on empathic vision?But he's repenting. Genuinely. And the SI knows that. As such, no eternal suffering.
Given that the SI's ability is unique, it's not in his best interest to have it studied extensively. Any research done on it could theoretically be used to counter him, while if he is the only one who knows the mechanics of it it can't be leaked to his enemies. Actually, it's better if he doesn't even know theoretically how to counter his own ability or how precisely it works, because then it can't be ripped from his head with telepathy.Has Paul investigated how hard it would be to make a ward that gives a false image on empathic vision?
But it is blocked with magic in general. Presumably a regular scry ward from a competent practitioner can give a false image so making one for emotions might already be doable for competent mages or with a few hours of research.Given that the SI's ability is unique, it's not in his best interest to have it studied extensively. Any research done on it could theoretically be used to counter him, while if he is the only one who knows the mechanics of it it can't be leaked to his enemies. Actually, it's better if he doesn't even know theoretically how to counter his own ability or how precisely it works, because then it can't be ripped from his head with telepathy.
Is "being good because you fear eternal, horrific torture" really something "genuinely nice"?
No, as they don't know what the image is supposed to look like, and their best guesses would be laughably simplistic and obvious. Blocking it is far easier, and most ways that would actually fool it would work for mind controlling him.But it is blocked with magic in general. Presumably a regular scry ward from a competent practitioner can give a false image so making one for emotions might already be doable for competent mages or with a few hours of research.
follow him as
Probably never. The SI isn't sufficiently interested in his wellbeing.So, his reform is genuine, just needs more time... in the interests of reducing Hell's recruitment, when does he get offered a rejuvenation?
Thank you, corrected.follow him as
try and straighten them out.
try and straighten them out?
Your argued intelligently
You argued intelligently
Electronic Warfare.
Name one evil whale in DC canon.And here I thought they had countermeasures against Evil Whales. Boy, was I wrong!![]()
Hrm. Tobias Whale?
Wow, what a crappy place that DC universe is. I mean, even if you get heaven, could you imagine a trillion years there without having any say so in the matter?
In the real world, such a thing would be called an "ECM field" ("electronic countermeasures") and such things that would interfere with the operation of such an effect are called "ECCM" ("electronic counter-countermeasures").
It doesn't get it wrong at all. B and C are not stable -- BECAUSE it's so bad to be on the bad side of these, and BECAUSE you can't control or predict what the other person will do, then attempting to exploit one of these gives you the RISK of falling into A. But by the default formulation of the dilemma, it's better to fall into A than into B or C. If you assume that the other person is going to make decisions using the same kind of intelligent reasoning as you, then that means that doing what you like is the best choice -- either you get the best reward, or you get a lesser punishment.Also, the SMBC gets it slightly but importantly wrong. It doesn't matter what A is made of. The important thing is that B and C are made of fire. Even an amoral idiot can pick D if A and D are the only squares on offer.